SMEUpcomingCOREINOffer-document study

Coreintegra Consulting Services Limited IPO

DRHP 6 Sep 2025

Price band
₹74.00 – ₹78.00
Lot
1,600 shares
₹1,24,800 at the top of the band
Subscription window
23 Sep – 25 Sep
2026
Market cap at ₹78
₹82 cr
all shares after the issue
P/E at ₹78
18.1×
on FY26 profit

Coreintegra Consulting Services SME IPO: key figures

From the offer document; each figure is cited in the study below

Growth

Revenue CAGR FY24–FY26
18.6%
PAT CAGR FY24–FY26
−4.4%
EBITDA margin FY24 → FY26
1.6% → 1.2%

Valuation

Market cap at ₹78
₹81.8 cr
P/E at ₹78
18.1×
Peer median P/E
18.9×
Versus peer median
−4%

Issue

Fresh issue at ₹78
₹22.0 cr
Offer for sale
none
Promoter holding before → after
64.5% → 47.2%

Concentration

Largest client
53.0% of FY26 revenue
Top five clients
89.3% of FY26 revenue

Balance sheet

Borrowings, March 2026
none
ROCE FY26
20.2%

Worth reading

Tax paid FY26 against current tax charge
₹8.1 cr against ₹0.3 cr
Cases against the company
3 tax, ₹0.1 cr
Net working capital days
6

Coreintegra Consulting Services Limited: what the offer document says

A Mumbai human-resource services company that supplies staff, runs payroll and handles compliance for 385 clients is issuing 28,19,200 new shares on NSE Emerge at ₹74 to ₹78, mainly for IT systems and senior hires; no shareholder is selling. FY26 revenue was ₹51,514.78 lakh but profit only ₹451.13 lakh, and one client provided 53.01% of revenue.

Published 21 Sep 2026 · 1,942 words · read from the RHP

01At a glance

What the company does — provides human-resource services: staffing, payroll processing and compliance, with most of its cost being the salaries of the people it places (RHP p.161, RHP p.31).

Who pays it — corporate clients; it served 385 in FY26. The largest provided 53.01% of FY26 revenue and the top five 89.31% (RHP p.25).

Why it is raising money — ₹1,175.79 lakh to upgrade IT infrastructure, ₹575.00 lakh to hire senior leaders and ₹50.00 lakh for brand building, plus general corporate purposes (RHP p.92).

How fast it has grown — revenue from ₹36,637.31 lakh in FY24 to ₹51,514.78 lakh in FY26, about 18.6% a year; profit fell from ₹493.60 lakh to ₹451.13 lakh (our arithmetic, RHP p.61).

The one thing to understand — very large revenue on a very thin margin, concentrated in one client. EBITDA was 1.17% of revenue in FY26 (RHP p.112), and ₹27,310.06 lakh of revenue came from a single client (RHP p.25).

02The business, in plain words

A staffing company employs people and places them with client companies, pays their salaries and statutory dues, and bills the client for the salaries plus a fee (RHP p.161).

A client needs workers → Coreintegra hires them on its own payroll and deploys them → it pays their wages, PF and ESIC → the client pays the wages back plus a margin.

In FY26, salaries, bonus and allowances were ₹30,708.80 lakh of ₹51,514.78 lakh of revenue (RHP p.31, RHP p.61). The company had 144 compliance staff among its core employees at August 2026 (RHP p.161).

Earnings equation: Profit ≈ billed wages × mark-up − the company's own staff and systems. The PAT margin was 0.87% in FY26 (RHP p.112).

03Where the money comes from

Share of revenueFY24FY25FY26
Largest client59.23%54.06%53.01%
Top five clients90.16%88.04%89.31%
Clients served288374385

Source: RHP p.25. Revenue depends heavily on one client: ₹27,310.06 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.25). The prospectus does not name it in the pages read.

04The growth record

₹ lakh, restatedFY24FY25FY26
Revenue36,637.3140,260.8751,514.78
EBITDA581.29420.34601.34
EBITDA margin1.59%1.04%1.17%
Profit after tax493.60346.06451.13
Operating cash flow754.63138.97(305.37)
Return on equity29.09%16.35%17.94%

Source: RHP p.112, RHP p.61, RHP p.62. Our arithmetic: revenue grew about 18.6% a year from FY24 to FY26, EBITDA about 1.7% a year, and profit fell about 4.4% a year (RHP p.112).

05What the growth is made of

More billed wages. Employee benefit expenses rose from ₹24,224.01 lakh to ₹32,424.63 lakh, and other expenses from ₹11,832.00 lakh to ₹18,488.80 lakh (RHP p.61). Profit did not follow revenue because the margin on each rupee billed narrowed (RHP p.112). The prospectus does not give the number of associates deployed in the pages read.

06Earnings quality

IndicatorWhat the document shows
Operating cash flow against profit₹588.23 lakh against ₹1,290.79 lakh over FY24–FY26 (our arithmetic, RHP p.62, RHP p.61)
Income tax paid₹808.80 lakh in FY26, against a current tax charge of ₹28.22 lakh (RHP p.62, RHP p.61)
Trade receivables₹2,741.95 lakh, about 19 days of revenue (our arithmetic, RHP p.60)
Net working capital days8, 9 and 6 (RHP p.112)
Exceptional item₹55.77 lakh gratuity provision in FY26 (RHP p.61)

FY26 operating cash flow was negative largely because tax paid was far above the year's tax charge (RHP p.62). The prospectus does not explain the difference in the pages read.

07The balance sheet

At March 2026 the company had no borrowings on its balance sheet, net worth of ₹2,740.50 lakh and cash and bank balances of ₹1,107.95 lakh (RHP p.60). It borrowed and repaid ₹8,795.71 lakh within FY26, typical of short-term payroll funding (RHP p.62). Other current liabilities were ₹3,163.46 lakh (RHP p.60). Intangible assets were ₹769.97 lakh, with ₹145.00 lakh more under development (RHP p.60).

After the issue: at the upper band the fresh issue adds ₹2,198.98 lakh before expenses (our arithmetic, RHP p.92).

08What the money is for

Object₹ lakh
Upgrade IT infrastructure1,175.79
Hire senior leadership575.00
Brand building50.00
General corporate purposesnot stated ([●]), at most 15% of gross proceeds or ₹1,000 lakh

Source: RHP p.92, RHP p.93. All of it is to be deployed in FY27 (RHP p.93).

Into the business 28,19,200 new shares, ₹2,198.98 lakh at the upper band (our arithmetic, RHP p.92). To selling shareholders nothing: there is no offer for sale (RHP p.1).

09Who is selling

No one. The issue is only new shares, and there is no anchor portion (RHP p.1).

10Promoters

The promoters are Sriram Natarajan, Sangeetha Sriram and Gaurav Bali (RHP p.1). The managing director, Mahesh Krishnamoorthy, drew ₹99.64 lakh in each of the last three years (RHP p.65). Eureka Outsourcing Solutions, which holds 28.52% of the company, is described as an enterprise under the significant influence or control of directors (RHP p.84, RHP p.65).

11Who already owns it

Holder, before the issueSharesShare
Sriram Natarajan37,67,52049.13%
Eureka Outsourcing Solutions21,86,86528.52%
Gaurav Bali9,59,41512.51%
Mahesh Krishnamoorthy3,83,2655.00%
Sangeetha Sriram2,19,9392.87%
Sandesh Chitnis1,50,3001.96%

Source: RHP p.84. The three promoters hold 64.51% before the issue and would hold about 47.2% of 1,04,87,005 shares after it (our arithmetic, RHP p.84, RHP p.57).

12What changed just before the IPO

  • Share capital rose from ₹1.53 lakh to ₹766.78 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.60).
  • Two independent directors joined in March 2025 (RHP p.65).
  • A chief financial officer and company secretary were paid from FY25 (RHP p.65).
  • Tax paid of ₹808.80 lakh in FY26 turned operating cash flow negative (RHP p.62).

13Capacity and expansion

The prospectus says capacity utilisation does not apply to a human-resource services company (RHP p.161). The largest object, ₹1,175.79 lakh, is for IT systems (RHP p.92).

14Market size and industry structure

As claimed — the industry overview runs from RHP p.123; this study does not restate its figures.

The part that is addressable — outsourced staffing, payroll and compliance services for companies in India.

What the company is today — FY26 revenue of ₹51,514.78 lakh from 385 clients (RHP p.61, RHP p.25).

15Competitive position

The company lists TeamLease Services and Quess Corp as its listed peers (RHP p.110). Its own margins are thin: EBITDA of 1.17% and PAT of 0.87% of revenue in FY26 (RHP p.112).

16Peers the company named

Peers named in the offer document: TeamLease Services and Quess Corp (RHP p.110).

The prospectus gives their P/E as 14.74 and 23.06, an average of 18.90 (RHP p.110). Both are far larger than Coreintegra. The return-on-net-worth table on the same page is labelled for FY23 to FY25, not FY26 (RHP p.110).

17Valuation at the issue price

At the upper band of ₹78, the 28,19,200 new shares take the total from 76,67,805 to 1,04,87,005 (RHP p.57):

At ₹78
Market capitalisation₹8,179.86 lakh
P/E on FY26 EPS of ₹5.8813.3 times
P/E on FY26 profit, shares after the issue18.1 times
Price to FY26 book value per share of ₹35.742.2 times
Market capitalisation to FY26 revenue0.16 times
EV to FY26 EBITDA8.1 times

Source: RHP p.61, RHP p.110, RHP p.112. At ₹74 the market capitalisation is ₹7,760.38 lakh (our arithmetic, RHP p.57). Enterprise value uses the shares before the issue and cash and bank balances of ₹1,107.95 lakh, with no borrowings: ₹4,872.94 lakh (our arithmetic, RHP p.60).

The two named peers are quoted at 14.74 and 23.06 times earnings (RHP p.110). At the upper band the issue is priced at 13.3 times FY26 EPS and 18.1 times FY26 profit on the enlarged share count.

18Subscription

Bidding opens on September 23, 2026 and closes on September 25, 2026, per the NSE issue page. This study was written before bidding opened. There is no anchor portion (RHP p.1). Individual investors must apply for at least two lots, so that the application exceeds ₹2,00,000 (RHP p.10); at the upper band two lots of 1,600 shares cost ₹2,49,600.

19Risks, in plain words

One client — the largest client provided 53.01% of FY26 revenue (RHP p.25) → losing it would halve revenue → the top five provided 89.31% (RHP p.25).

Thin margin — EBITDA was 1.17% of revenue (RHP p.112) → a small change in the mark-up or in statutory costs moves profit sharply.

Cash — FY26 operating cash flow was negative (RHP p.62).

Compliance record — the prospectus lists past delays in filings with the Registrar of Companies (RHP p.44).

20Litigation and regulatory matters

PartyProceedings againstAmount, ₹ lakh
Company3 tax5.70

Source: RHP p.25.

22What the offer document does not say

The largest client is not named in the pages read. The number of associates deployed and the mark-up per associate are not given in the pages read. The reason FY26 tax paid was far above the tax charge is not explained in the pages read.

23Five questions for management

  1. How long is the contract with the largest client, and what are its renewal terms?
  2. How many associates were deployed at March 2026, and what was the average monthly margin per associate?
  3. Why was ₹808.80 lakh of income tax paid in FY26 against a current tax charge of ₹28.22 lakh?
  4. What will the ₹1,175.79 lakh IT upgrade replace, and what savings does it target?
  5. What business does Eureka Outsourcing Solutions do, and does it compete with or supply the company?

1Sources and cited facts

This study was read from 1 document the company filed. The 52 figures it cites are listed under the document each came from, with the page and the sentence as printed.

Coreintegra Consulting Services Limited RHPrhp · filed 2025-09-0652 facts
  1. 1
    At a glanceThe largest provided 53.01% of FY26 revenue and the top five 89.31% (RHP p.25).p.25

    The largest provided 53.01% of FY26 revenue and the top five 89.31% (RHP p.25).

  2. 2
    At a glanceWhy it is raising money** — ₹1,175.79 lakh to upgrade IT infrastructure, ₹575.00 lakh to hire senior leaders and ₹50.00 lakh for brand building, plus general corporate purposes (RHP p.92).p.92

    Why it is raising money** — ₹1,175.79 lakh to upgrade IT infrastructure, ₹575.00 lakh to hire senior leaders and ₹50.00 lakh for brand building, plus general corporate purposes (RHP p.92).

  3. 3
    At a glanceEBITDA was 1.17% of revenue in FY26 (RHP p.112), and ₹27,310.06 lakh of revenue came from a single client (RHP p.25).p.112

    EBITDA was 1.17% of revenue in FY26 (RHP p.112), and ₹27,310.06 lakh of revenue came from a single client (RHP p.25).

  4. 4
    The business, in plain wordsA staffing company employs people and places them with client companies, pays their salaries and statutory dues, and bills the client for the salaries plus a fee (RHP p.161).p.161

    A staffing company employs people and places them with client companies, pays their salaries and statutory dues, and bills the client for the salaries plus a fee (RHP p.161).

  5. 5
    The business, in plain wordsThe company had 144 compliance staff among its core employees at August 2026 (RHP p.161).p.161

    The company had 144 compliance staff among its core employees at August 2026 (RHP p.161).

  6. 6
    The business, in plain wordsThe PAT margin was 0.87% in FY26 (RHP p.112).p.112

    The PAT margin was 0.87% in FY26 (RHP p.112).

  7. 7
    Where the money comes fromRevenue depends heavily on one client: ₹27,310.06 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.25).p.25

    Revenue depends heavily on one client: ₹27,310.06 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.25).

  8. 8
    The growth recordOur arithmetic: revenue grew about 18.6% a year from FY24 to FY26, EBITDA about 1.7% a year, and profit fell about 4.4% a year (RHP p.112).p.112

    Our arithmetic: revenue grew about 18.6% a year from FY24 to FY26, EBITDA about 1.7% a year, and profit fell about 4.4% a year (RHP p.112).

  9. 9
    What the growth is made ofEmployee benefit expenses rose from ₹24,224.01 lakh to ₹32,424.63 lakh, and other expenses from ₹11,832.00 lakh to ₹18,488.80 lakh (RHP p.61).p.61

    Employee benefit expenses rose from ₹24,224.01 lakh to ₹32,424.63 lakh, and other expenses from ₹11,832.00 lakh to ₹18,488.80 lakh (RHP p.61).

  10. 10
    What the growth is made ofProfit did not follow revenue because the margin on each rupee billed narrowed (RHP p.112).p.112

    Profit did not follow revenue because the margin on each rupee billed narrowed (RHP p.112).

  11. 11
    Earnings qualityNet working capital days | 8, 9 and 6 (RHP p.112)p.112

    Net working capital days | 8, 9 and 6 (RHP p.112)

  12. 12
    Earnings qualityExceptional item | ₹55.77 lakh gratuity provision in FY26 (RHP p.61)p.61

    Exceptional item | ₹55.77 lakh gratuity provision in FY26 (RHP p.61)

  13. 13
    Earnings qualityFY26 operating cash flow was negative largely because tax paid was far above the year's tax charge (RHP p.62).p.62

    FY26 operating cash flow was negative largely because tax paid was far above the year's tax charge (RHP p.62).

  14. 14
    The balance sheetAt March 2026 the company had no borrowings on its balance sheet, net worth of ₹2,740.50 lakh and cash and bank balances of ₹1,107.95 lakh (RHP p.60).p.60

    At March 2026 the company had no borrowings on its balance sheet, net worth of ₹2,740.50 lakh and cash and bank balances of ₹1,107.95 lakh (RHP p.60).

  15. 15
    The balance sheetIt borrowed and repaid ₹8,795.71 lakh within FY26, typical of short-term payroll funding (RHP p.62).p.62

    It borrowed and repaid ₹8,795.71 lakh within FY26, typical of short-term payroll funding (RHP p.62).

  16. 16
    The balance sheetOther current liabilities were ₹3,163.46 lakh (RHP p.60).p.60

    Other current liabilities were ₹3,163.46 lakh (RHP p.60).

  17. 17
    The balance sheetIntangible assets were ₹769.97 lakh, with ₹145.00 lakh more under development (RHP p.60).p.60

    Intangible assets were ₹769.97 lakh, with ₹145.00 lakh more under development (RHP p.60).

  18. 18
    What the money is forAll of it is to be deployed in FY27 (RHP p.93).p.93

    All of it is to be deployed in FY27 (RHP p.93).

  19. 19
    What the money is for> **To selling shareholders** nothing: there is no offer for sale (RHP p.1).p.1

    > **To selling shareholders** nothing: there is no offer for sale (RHP p.1).

  20. 20
    Who is sellingThe issue is only new shares, and there is no anchor portion (RHP p.1).p.1

    The issue is only new shares, and there is no anchor portion (RHP p.1).

  21. 21
    PromotersThe promoters are Sriram Natarajan, Sangeetha Sriram and Gaurav Bali (RHP p.1).p.1

    The promoters are Sriram Natarajan, Sangeetha Sriram and Gaurav Bali (RHP p.1).

  22. 22
    PromotersThe managing director, Mahesh Krishnamoorthy, drew ₹99.64 lakh in each of the last three years (RHP p.65).p.65

    The managing director, Mahesh Krishnamoorthy, drew ₹99.64 lakh in each of the last three years (RHP p.65).

  23. 23
    What changed just before the IPOShare capital rose from ₹1.53 lakh to ₹766.78 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.60).p.60

    Share capital rose from ₹1.53 lakh to ₹766.78 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.60).

  24. 24
    What changed just before the IPOTwo independent directors joined in March 2025 (RHP p.65).p.65

    Two independent directors joined in March 2025 (RHP p.65).

  25. 25
    What changed just before the IPOA chief financial officer and company secretary were paid from FY25 (RHP p.65).p.65

    A chief financial officer and company secretary were paid from FY25 (RHP p.65).

  26. 26
    What changed just before the IPOTax paid of ₹808.80 lakh in FY26 turned operating cash flow negative (RHP p.62).p.62

    Tax paid of ₹808.80 lakh in FY26 turned operating cash flow negative (RHP p.62).

  27. 27
    Capacity and expansionThe prospectus says capacity utilisation does not apply to a human-resource services company (RHP p.161).p.161

    The prospectus says capacity utilisation does not apply to a human-resource services company (RHP p.161).

  28. 28
    Capacity and expansionThe largest object, ₹1,175.79 lakh, is for IT systems (RHP p.92).p.92

    The largest object, ₹1,175.79 lakh, is for IT systems (RHP p.92).

  29. 29
    Competitive positionThe company lists TeamLease Services and Quess Corp as its listed peers (RHP p.110).p.110

    The company lists TeamLease Services and Quess Corp as its listed peers (RHP p.110).

  30. 30
    Competitive positionIts own margins are thin: EBITDA of 1.17% and PAT of 0.87% of revenue in FY26 (RHP p.112).p.112

    Its own margins are thin: EBITDA of 1.17% and PAT of 0.87% of revenue in FY26 (RHP p.112).

  31. 31
    Peers the company named> **Peers named in the offer document:** TeamLease Services and Quess Corp (RHP p.110).p.110

    > **Peers named in the offer document:** TeamLease Services and Quess Corp (RHP p.110).

  32. 32
    Peers the company namedThe prospectus gives their P/E as 14.74 and 23.06, an average of 18.90 (RHP p.110).p.110

    The prospectus gives their P/E as 14.74 and 23.06, an average of 18.90 (RHP p.110).

  33. 33
    Peers the company namedThe return-on-net-worth table on the same page is labelled for FY23 to FY25, not FY26 (RHP p.110).p.110

    The return-on-net-worth table on the same page is labelled for FY23 to FY25, not FY26 (RHP p.110).

  34. 34
    Valuation at the issue priceAt the upper band of ₹78, the 28,19,200 new shares take the total from 76,67,805 to 1,04,87,005 (RHP p.57):p.57

    At the upper band of ₹78, the 28,19,200 new shares take the total from 76,67,805 to 1,04,87,005 (RHP p.57):

  35. 35
    Valuation at the issue priceThe two named peers are quoted at 14.74 and 23.06 times earnings (RHP p.110).p.110

    The two named peers are quoted at 14.74 and 23.06 times earnings (RHP p.110).

  36. 36
    SubscriptionThere is no anchor portion (RHP p.1).p.1

    There is no anchor portion (RHP p.1).

  37. 37
    SubscriptionIndividual investors must apply for at least two lots, so that the application exceeds ₹2,00,000 (RHP p.10); at the upper band two lots of 1,600 shares cost ₹2,49,600.p.10

    Individual investors must apply for at least two lots, so that the application exceeds ₹2,00,000 (RHP p.10); at the upper band two lots of 1,600 shares cost ₹2,49,600.

  38. 38
    Risks, in plain wordsOne client** — the largest client provided 53.01% of FY26 revenue (RHP p.25) → losing it would halve revenue → the top five provided 89.31% (RHP p.25).p.25

    One client** — the largest client provided 53.01% of FY26 revenue (RHP p.25) → losing it would halve revenue → the top five provided 89.31% (RHP p.25).

  39. 39
    Risks, in plain wordsThin margin** — EBITDA was 1.17% of revenue (RHP p.112) → a small change in the mark-up or in statutory costs moves profit sharply.p.112

    Thin margin** — EBITDA was 1.17% of revenue (RHP p.112) → a small change in the mark-up or in statutory costs moves profit sharply.

  40. 40
    Risks, in plain wordsCash** — FY26 operating cash flow was negative (RHP p.62).p.62

    Cash** — FY26 operating cash flow was negative (RHP p.62).

  41. 41
    Risks, in plain wordsCompliance record** — the prospectus lists past delays in filings with the Registrar of Companies (RHP p.44).p.44

    Compliance record** — the prospectus lists past delays in filings with the Registrar of Companies (RHP p.44).

  42. 42
    Related-party transactionsThe managing director's remuneration was ₹99.64 lakh a year, and the CFO and company secretary were paid ₹22.37 lakh and ₹23.09 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.65).p.65

    The managing director's remuneration was ₹99.64 lakh a year, and the CFO and company secretary were paid ₹22.37 lakh and ₹23.09 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.65).

  43. 43
    Related-party transactionsEureka Outsourcing Solutions and Eureka Digitisation & Automation Services are listed as enterprises under the influence of directors (RHP p.65).p.65

    Eureka Outsourcing Solutions and Eureka Digitisation & Automation Services are listed as enterprises under the influence of directors (RHP p.65).

  44. 44
    Key figuresGrowth | EBITDA margin FY24 → FY26 | 1.6% → 1.2% | (RHP p.112)p.112

    Growth | EBITDA margin FY24 → FY26 | 1.6% → 1.2% | (RHP p.112)

  45. 45
    Key figuresValuation | Peer median P/E | 18.9× | (RHP p.110)p.110

    Valuation | Peer median P/E | 18.9× | (RHP p.110)

  46. 46
    Key figuresIssue | Offer for sale | none | (RHP p.1)p.1

    Issue | Offer for sale | none | (RHP p.1)

  47. 47
    Key figuresConcentration | Largest client | 53.0% of FY26 revenue | (RHP p.25)p.25

    Concentration | Largest client | 53.0% of FY26 revenue | (RHP p.25)

  48. 48
    Key figuresConcentration | Top five clients | 89.3% of FY26 revenue | (RHP p.25)p.25

    Concentration | Top five clients | 89.3% of FY26 revenue | (RHP p.25)

  49. 49
    Key figuresBalance sheet | Borrowings, March 2026 | none | (RHP p.60)p.60

    Balance sheet | Borrowings, March 2026 | none | (RHP p.60)

  50. 50
    Key figuresBalance sheet | ROCE FY26 | 20.2% | (RHP p.112)p.112

    Balance sheet | ROCE FY26 | 20.2% | (RHP p.112)

  51. 51
    Key figuresWorth reading | Cases against the company | 3 tax, ₹0.1 cr | (RHP p.25)p.25

    Worth reading | Cases against the company | 3 tax, ₹0.1 cr | (RHP p.25)

  52. 52
    Key figuresWorth reading | Net working capital days | 6 | (RHP p.112)p.112

    Worth reading | Net working capital days | 6 | (RHP p.112)

Not on this page yet: the peer table the issuer printed. Each is added when the pipeline extracts it from the offer document.