Coreintegra Consulting Services Limited IPO
DRHP 6 Sep 2025
- Price band
- ₹74.00 – ₹78.00
- Lot
- 1,600 shares
- ₹1,24,800 at the top of the band
- Subscription window
- 23 Sep – 25 Sep
- 2026
- Market cap at ₹78
- ₹82 cr
- all shares after the issue
- P/E at ₹78
- 18.1×
- on FY26 profit
Coreintegra Consulting Services SME IPO: key figures
From the offer document; each figure is cited in the study below
Growth
- Revenue CAGR FY24–FY26
- 18.6%
- PAT CAGR FY24–FY26
- −4.4%
- EBITDA margin FY24 → FY26
- 1.6% → 1.2%
Valuation
- Market cap at ₹78
- ₹81.8 cr
- P/E at ₹78
- 18.1×
- Peer median P/E
- 18.9×
- Versus peer median
- −4%
Issue
- Fresh issue at ₹78
- ₹22.0 cr
- Offer for sale
- none
- Promoter holding before → after
- 64.5% → 47.2%
Concentration
- Largest client
- 53.0% of FY26 revenue
- Top five clients
- 89.3% of FY26 revenue
Balance sheet
- Borrowings, March 2026
- none
- ROCE FY26
- 20.2%
Worth reading
- Tax paid FY26 against current tax charge
- ₹8.1 cr against ₹0.3 cr
- Cases against the company
- 3 tax, ₹0.1 cr
- Net working capital days
- 6
Coreintegra Consulting Services Limited: what the offer document says
A Mumbai human-resource services company that supplies staff, runs payroll and handles compliance for 385 clients is issuing 28,19,200 new shares on NSE Emerge at ₹74 to ₹78, mainly for IT systems and senior hires; no shareholder is selling. FY26 revenue was ₹51,514.78 lakh but profit only ₹451.13 lakh, and one client provided 53.01% of revenue.
Published 21 Sep 2026 · 1,942 words · read from the RHP
01At a glance
What the company does — provides human-resource services: staffing, payroll processing and compliance, with most of its cost being the salaries of the people it places (RHP p.161, RHP p.31).
Who pays it — corporate clients; it served 385 in FY26. The largest provided 53.01% of FY26 revenue and the top five 89.31% (RHP p.25).
Why it is raising money — ₹1,175.79 lakh to upgrade IT infrastructure, ₹575.00 lakh to hire senior leaders and ₹50.00 lakh for brand building, plus general corporate purposes (RHP p.92).
How fast it has grown — revenue from ₹36,637.31 lakh in FY24 to ₹51,514.78 lakh in FY26, about 18.6% a year; profit fell from ₹493.60 lakh to ₹451.13 lakh (our arithmetic, RHP p.61).
The one thing to understand — very large revenue on a very thin margin, concentrated in one client. EBITDA was 1.17% of revenue in FY26 (RHP p.112), and ₹27,310.06 lakh of revenue came from a single client (RHP p.25).
02The business, in plain words
A staffing company employs people and places them with client companies, pays their salaries and statutory dues, and bills the client for the salaries plus a fee (RHP p.161).
A client needs workers → Coreintegra hires them on its own payroll and deploys them → it pays their wages, PF and ESIC → the client pays the wages back plus a margin.
In FY26, salaries, bonus and allowances were ₹30,708.80 lakh of ₹51,514.78 lakh of revenue (RHP p.31, RHP p.61). The company had 144 compliance staff among its core employees at August 2026 (RHP p.161).
Earnings equation: Profit ≈ billed wages × mark-up − the company's own staff and systems. The PAT margin was 0.87% in FY26 (RHP p.112).
03Where the money comes from
| Share of revenue | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Largest client | 59.23% | 54.06% | 53.01% |
| Top five clients | 90.16% | 88.04% | 89.31% |
| Clients served | 288 | 374 | 385 |
Source: RHP p.25. Revenue depends heavily on one client: ₹27,310.06 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.25). The prospectus does not name it in the pages read.
04The growth record
| ₹ lakh, restated | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 36,637.31 | 40,260.87 | 51,514.78 |
| EBITDA | 581.29 | 420.34 | 601.34 |
| EBITDA margin | 1.59% | 1.04% | 1.17% |
| Profit after tax | 493.60 | 346.06 | 451.13 |
| Operating cash flow | 754.63 | 138.97 | (305.37) |
| Return on equity | 29.09% | 16.35% | 17.94% |
Source: RHP p.112, RHP p.61, RHP p.62. Our arithmetic: revenue grew about 18.6% a year from FY24 to FY26, EBITDA about 1.7% a year, and profit fell about 4.4% a year (RHP p.112).
05What the growth is made of
More billed wages. Employee benefit expenses rose from ₹24,224.01 lakh to ₹32,424.63 lakh, and other expenses from ₹11,832.00 lakh to ₹18,488.80 lakh (RHP p.61). Profit did not follow revenue because the margin on each rupee billed narrowed (RHP p.112). The prospectus does not give the number of associates deployed in the pages read.
06Earnings quality
| Indicator | What the document shows |
|---|---|
| Operating cash flow against profit | ₹588.23 lakh against ₹1,290.79 lakh over FY24–FY26 (our arithmetic, RHP p.62, RHP p.61) |
| Income tax paid | ₹808.80 lakh in FY26, against a current tax charge of ₹28.22 lakh (RHP p.62, RHP p.61) |
| Trade receivables | ₹2,741.95 lakh, about 19 days of revenue (our arithmetic, RHP p.60) |
| Net working capital days | 8, 9 and 6 (RHP p.112) |
| Exceptional item | ₹55.77 lakh gratuity provision in FY26 (RHP p.61) |
FY26 operating cash flow was negative largely because tax paid was far above the year's tax charge (RHP p.62). The prospectus does not explain the difference in the pages read.
07The balance sheet
At March 2026 the company had no borrowings on its balance sheet, net worth of ₹2,740.50 lakh and cash and bank balances of ₹1,107.95 lakh (RHP p.60). It borrowed and repaid ₹8,795.71 lakh within FY26, typical of short-term payroll funding (RHP p.62). Other current liabilities were ₹3,163.46 lakh (RHP p.60). Intangible assets were ₹769.97 lakh, with ₹145.00 lakh more under development (RHP p.60).
After the issue: at the upper band the fresh issue adds ₹2,198.98 lakh before expenses (our arithmetic, RHP p.92).
08What the money is for
| Object | ₹ lakh |
|---|---|
| Upgrade IT infrastructure | 1,175.79 |
| Hire senior leadership | 575.00 |
| Brand building | 50.00 |
| General corporate purposes | not stated ([●]), at most 15% of gross proceeds or ₹1,000 lakh |
Source: RHP p.92, RHP p.93. All of it is to be deployed in FY27 (RHP p.93).
Into the business 28,19,200 new shares, ₹2,198.98 lakh at the upper band (our arithmetic, RHP p.92). To selling shareholders nothing: there is no offer for sale (RHP p.1).
09Who is selling
No one. The issue is only new shares, and there is no anchor portion (RHP p.1).
10Promoters
The promoters are Sriram Natarajan, Sangeetha Sriram and Gaurav Bali (RHP p.1). The managing director, Mahesh Krishnamoorthy, drew ₹99.64 lakh in each of the last three years (RHP p.65). Eureka Outsourcing Solutions, which holds 28.52% of the company, is described as an enterprise under the significant influence or control of directors (RHP p.84, RHP p.65).
11Who already owns it
| Holder, before the issue | Shares | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Sriram Natarajan | 37,67,520 | 49.13% |
| Eureka Outsourcing Solutions | 21,86,865 | 28.52% |
| Gaurav Bali | 9,59,415 | 12.51% |
| Mahesh Krishnamoorthy | 3,83,265 | 5.00% |
| Sangeetha Sriram | 2,19,939 | 2.87% |
| Sandesh Chitnis | 1,50,300 | 1.96% |
Source: RHP p.84. The three promoters hold 64.51% before the issue and would hold about 47.2% of 1,04,87,005 shares after it (our arithmetic, RHP p.84, RHP p.57).
12What changed just before the IPO
- Share capital rose from ₹1.53 lakh to ₹766.78 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.60).
- Two independent directors joined in March 2025 (RHP p.65).
- A chief financial officer and company secretary were paid from FY25 (RHP p.65).
- Tax paid of ₹808.80 lakh in FY26 turned operating cash flow negative (RHP p.62).
13Capacity and expansion
The prospectus says capacity utilisation does not apply to a human-resource services company (RHP p.161). The largest object, ₹1,175.79 lakh, is for IT systems (RHP p.92).
14Market size and industry structure
As claimed — the industry overview runs from RHP p.123; this study does not restate its figures.
The part that is addressable — outsourced staffing, payroll and compliance services for companies in India.
What the company is today — FY26 revenue of ₹51,514.78 lakh from 385 clients (RHP p.61, RHP p.25).
15Competitive position
The company lists TeamLease Services and Quess Corp as its listed peers (RHP p.110). Its own margins are thin: EBITDA of 1.17% and PAT of 0.87% of revenue in FY26 (RHP p.112).
16Peers the company named
Peers named in the offer document: TeamLease Services and Quess Corp (RHP p.110).
The prospectus gives their P/E as 14.74 and 23.06, an average of 18.90 (RHP p.110). Both are far larger than Coreintegra. The return-on-net-worth table on the same page is labelled for FY23 to FY25, not FY26 (RHP p.110).
17Valuation at the issue price
At the upper band of ₹78, the 28,19,200 new shares take the total from 76,67,805 to 1,04,87,005 (RHP p.57):
| At ₹78 | |
|---|---|
| Market capitalisation | ₹8,179.86 lakh |
| P/E on FY26 EPS of ₹5.88 | 13.3 times |
| P/E on FY26 profit, shares after the issue | 18.1 times |
| Price to FY26 book value per share of ₹35.74 | 2.2 times |
| Market capitalisation to FY26 revenue | 0.16 times |
| EV to FY26 EBITDA | 8.1 times |
Source: RHP p.61, RHP p.110, RHP p.112. At ₹74 the market capitalisation is ₹7,760.38 lakh (our arithmetic, RHP p.57). Enterprise value uses the shares before the issue and cash and bank balances of ₹1,107.95 lakh, with no borrowings: ₹4,872.94 lakh (our arithmetic, RHP p.60).
The two named peers are quoted at 14.74 and 23.06 times earnings (RHP p.110). At the upper band the issue is priced at 13.3 times FY26 EPS and 18.1 times FY26 profit on the enlarged share count.
18Subscription
Bidding opens on September 23, 2026 and closes on September 25, 2026, per the NSE issue page. This study was written before bidding opened. There is no anchor portion (RHP p.1). Individual investors must apply for at least two lots, so that the application exceeds ₹2,00,000 (RHP p.10); at the upper band two lots of 1,600 shares cost ₹2,49,600.
19Risks, in plain words
One client — the largest client provided 53.01% of FY26 revenue (RHP p.25) → losing it would halve revenue → the top five provided 89.31% (RHP p.25).
Thin margin — EBITDA was 1.17% of revenue (RHP p.112) → a small change in the mark-up or in statutory costs moves profit sharply.
Cash — FY26 operating cash flow was negative (RHP p.62).
Compliance record — the prospectus lists past delays in filings with the Registrar of Companies (RHP p.44).
20Litigation and regulatory matters
| Party | Proceedings against | Amount, ₹ lakh |
|---|---|---|
| Company | 3 tax | 5.70 |
Source: RHP p.25.
22What the offer document does not say
The largest client is not named in the pages read. The number of associates deployed and the mark-up per associate are not given in the pages read. The reason FY26 tax paid was far above the tax charge is not explained in the pages read.
23Five questions for management
- How long is the contract with the largest client, and what are its renewal terms?
- How many associates were deployed at March 2026, and what was the average monthly margin per associate?
- Why was ₹808.80 lakh of income tax paid in FY26 against a current tax charge of ₹28.22 lakh?
- What will the ₹1,175.79 lakh IT upgrade replace, and what savings does it target?
- What business does Eureka Outsourcing Solutions do, and does it compete with or supply the company?
1Sources and cited facts
This study was read from 1 document the company filed. The 52 figures it cites are listed under the document each came from, with the page and the sentence as printed.
- 1
“The largest provided 53.01% of FY26 revenue and the top five 89.31% (RHP p.25).”
- 2At a glanceWhy it is raising money** — ₹1,175.79 lakh to upgrade IT infrastructure, ₹575.00 lakh to hire senior leaders and ₹50.00 lakh for brand building, plus general corporate purposes (RHP p.92).p.92
“Why it is raising money** — ₹1,175.79 lakh to upgrade IT infrastructure, ₹575.00 lakh to hire senior leaders and ₹50.00 lakh for brand building, plus general corporate purposes (RHP p.92).”
- 3At a glanceEBITDA was 1.17% of revenue in FY26 (RHP p.112), and ₹27,310.06 lakh of revenue came from a single client (RHP p.25).p.112
“EBITDA was 1.17% of revenue in FY26 (RHP p.112), and ₹27,310.06 lakh of revenue came from a single client (RHP p.25).”
- 4The business, in plain wordsA staffing company employs people and places them with client companies, pays their salaries and statutory dues, and bills the client for the salaries plus a fee (RHP p.161).p.161
“A staffing company employs people and places them with client companies, pays their salaries and statutory dues, and bills the client for the salaries plus a fee (RHP p.161).”
- 5The business, in plain wordsThe company had 144 compliance staff among its core employees at August 2026 (RHP p.161).p.161
“The company had 144 compliance staff among its core employees at August 2026 (RHP p.161).”
- 6
“The PAT margin was 0.87% in FY26 (RHP p.112).”
- 7Where the money comes fromRevenue depends heavily on one client: ₹27,310.06 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.25).p.25
“Revenue depends heavily on one client: ₹27,310.06 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.25).”
- 8The growth recordOur arithmetic: revenue grew about 18.6% a year from FY24 to FY26, EBITDA about 1.7% a year, and profit fell about 4.4% a year (RHP p.112).p.112
“Our arithmetic: revenue grew about 18.6% a year from FY24 to FY26, EBITDA about 1.7% a year, and profit fell about 4.4% a year (RHP p.112).”
- 9What the growth is made ofEmployee benefit expenses rose from ₹24,224.01 lakh to ₹32,424.63 lakh, and other expenses from ₹11,832.00 lakh to ₹18,488.80 lakh (RHP p.61).p.61
“Employee benefit expenses rose from ₹24,224.01 lakh to ₹32,424.63 lakh, and other expenses from ₹11,832.00 lakh to ₹18,488.80 lakh (RHP p.61).”
- 10What the growth is made ofProfit did not follow revenue because the margin on each rupee billed narrowed (RHP p.112).p.112
“Profit did not follow revenue because the margin on each rupee billed narrowed (RHP p.112).”
- 11
“Net working capital days | 8, 9 and 6 (RHP p.112)”
- 12
“Exceptional item | ₹55.77 lakh gratuity provision in FY26 (RHP p.61)”
- 13Earnings qualityFY26 operating cash flow was negative largely because tax paid was far above the year's tax charge (RHP p.62).p.62
“FY26 operating cash flow was negative largely because tax paid was far above the year's tax charge (RHP p.62).”
- 14The balance sheetAt March 2026 the company had no borrowings on its balance sheet, net worth of ₹2,740.50 lakh and cash and bank balances of ₹1,107.95 lakh (RHP p.60).p.60
“At March 2026 the company had no borrowings on its balance sheet, net worth of ₹2,740.50 lakh and cash and bank balances of ₹1,107.95 lakh (RHP p.60).”
- 15The balance sheetIt borrowed and repaid ₹8,795.71 lakh within FY26, typical of short-term payroll funding (RHP p.62).p.62
“It borrowed and repaid ₹8,795.71 lakh within FY26, typical of short-term payroll funding (RHP p.62).”
- 16
“Other current liabilities were ₹3,163.46 lakh (RHP p.60).”
- 17The balance sheetIntangible assets were ₹769.97 lakh, with ₹145.00 lakh more under development (RHP p.60).p.60
“Intangible assets were ₹769.97 lakh, with ₹145.00 lakh more under development (RHP p.60).”
- 18
“All of it is to be deployed in FY27 (RHP p.93).”
- 19What the money is for> **To selling shareholders** nothing: there is no offer for sale (RHP p.1).p.1
“> **To selling shareholders** nothing: there is no offer for sale (RHP p.1).”
- 20
“The issue is only new shares, and there is no anchor portion (RHP p.1).”
- 21
“The promoters are Sriram Natarajan, Sangeetha Sriram and Gaurav Bali (RHP p.1).”
- 22PromotersThe managing director, Mahesh Krishnamoorthy, drew ₹99.64 lakh in each of the last three years (RHP p.65).p.65
“The managing director, Mahesh Krishnamoorthy, drew ₹99.64 lakh in each of the last three years (RHP p.65).”
- 23What changed just before the IPOShare capital rose from ₹1.53 lakh to ₹766.78 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.60).p.60
“Share capital rose from ₹1.53 lakh to ₹766.78 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.60).”
- 24
“Two independent directors joined in March 2025 (RHP p.65).”
- 25What changed just before the IPOA chief financial officer and company secretary were paid from FY25 (RHP p.65).p.65
“A chief financial officer and company secretary were paid from FY25 (RHP p.65).”
- 26What changed just before the IPOTax paid of ₹808.80 lakh in FY26 turned operating cash flow negative (RHP p.62).p.62
“Tax paid of ₹808.80 lakh in FY26 turned operating cash flow negative (RHP p.62).”
- 27Capacity and expansionThe prospectus says capacity utilisation does not apply to a human-resource services company (RHP p.161).p.161
“The prospectus says capacity utilisation does not apply to a human-resource services company (RHP p.161).”
- 28
“The largest object, ₹1,175.79 lakh, is for IT systems (RHP p.92).”
- 29Competitive positionThe company lists TeamLease Services and Quess Corp as its listed peers (RHP p.110).p.110
“The company lists TeamLease Services and Quess Corp as its listed peers (RHP p.110).”
- 30Competitive positionIts own margins are thin: EBITDA of 1.17% and PAT of 0.87% of revenue in FY26 (RHP p.112).p.112
“Its own margins are thin: EBITDA of 1.17% and PAT of 0.87% of revenue in FY26 (RHP p.112).”
- 31Peers the company named> **Peers named in the offer document:** TeamLease Services and Quess Corp (RHP p.110).p.110
“> **Peers named in the offer document:** TeamLease Services and Quess Corp (RHP p.110).”
- 32Peers the company namedThe prospectus gives their P/E as 14.74 and 23.06, an average of 18.90 (RHP p.110).p.110
“The prospectus gives their P/E as 14.74 and 23.06, an average of 18.90 (RHP p.110).”
- 33Peers the company namedThe return-on-net-worth table on the same page is labelled for FY23 to FY25, not FY26 (RHP p.110).p.110
“The return-on-net-worth table on the same page is labelled for FY23 to FY25, not FY26 (RHP p.110).”
- 34Valuation at the issue priceAt the upper band of ₹78, the 28,19,200 new shares take the total from 76,67,805 to 1,04,87,005 (RHP p.57):p.57
“At the upper band of ₹78, the 28,19,200 new shares take the total from 76,67,805 to 1,04,87,005 (RHP p.57):”
- 35Valuation at the issue priceThe two named peers are quoted at 14.74 and 23.06 times earnings (RHP p.110).p.110
“The two named peers are quoted at 14.74 and 23.06 times earnings (RHP p.110).”
- 36
“There is no anchor portion (RHP p.1).”
- 37SubscriptionIndividual investors must apply for at least two lots, so that the application exceeds ₹2,00,000 (RHP p.10); at the upper band two lots of 1,600 shares cost ₹2,49,600.p.10
“Individual investors must apply for at least two lots, so that the application exceeds ₹2,00,000 (RHP p.10); at the upper band two lots of 1,600 shares cost ₹2,49,600.”
- 38Risks, in plain wordsOne client** — the largest client provided 53.01% of FY26 revenue (RHP p.25) → losing it would halve revenue → the top five provided 89.31% (RHP p.25).p.25
“One client** — the largest client provided 53.01% of FY26 revenue (RHP p.25) → losing it would halve revenue → the top five provided 89.31% (RHP p.25).”
- 39Risks, in plain wordsThin margin** — EBITDA was 1.17% of revenue (RHP p.112) → a small change in the mark-up or in statutory costs moves profit sharply.p.112
“Thin margin** — EBITDA was 1.17% of revenue (RHP p.112) → a small change in the mark-up or in statutory costs moves profit sharply.”
- 40
“Cash** — FY26 operating cash flow was negative (RHP p.62).”
- 41Risks, in plain wordsCompliance record** — the prospectus lists past delays in filings with the Registrar of Companies (RHP p.44).p.44
“Compliance record** — the prospectus lists past delays in filings with the Registrar of Companies (RHP p.44).”
- 42Related-party transactionsThe managing director's remuneration was ₹99.64 lakh a year, and the CFO and company secretary were paid ₹22.37 lakh and ₹23.09 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.65).p.65
“The managing director's remuneration was ₹99.64 lakh a year, and the CFO and company secretary were paid ₹22.37 lakh and ₹23.09 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.65).”
- 43Related-party transactionsEureka Outsourcing Solutions and Eureka Digitisation & Automation Services are listed as enterprises under the influence of directors (RHP p.65).p.65
“Eureka Outsourcing Solutions and Eureka Digitisation & Automation Services are listed as enterprises under the influence of directors (RHP p.65).”
- 44
“Growth | EBITDA margin FY24 → FY26 | 1.6% → 1.2% | (RHP p.112)”
- 45
“Valuation | Peer median P/E | 18.9× | (RHP p.110)”
- 46
“Issue | Offer for sale | none | (RHP p.1)”
- 47
“Concentration | Largest client | 53.0% of FY26 revenue | (RHP p.25)”
- 48
“Concentration | Top five clients | 89.3% of FY26 revenue | (RHP p.25)”
- 49
“Balance sheet | Borrowings, March 2026 | none | (RHP p.60)”
- 50
“Balance sheet | ROCE FY26 | 20.2% | (RHP p.112)”
- 51
“Worth reading | Cases against the company | 3 tax, ₹0.1 cr | (RHP p.25)”
- 52
“Worth reading | Net working capital days | 6 | (RHP p.112)”
Not on this page yet: the peer table the issuer printed. Each is added when the pipeline extracts it from the offer document.