MainboardDRHP filedOffer-document study

Monomark Engineering (India) Limited IPO

Capital goods and engineering · DRHP 30 Mar 2026

Follow this IPOband, bidding, allotment and listing, on Telegram

DRHP filed
30 Mar 2026

A Chittorgarh, Rajasthan contractor that runs and maintains equipment inside metal plants, cement works and ports, and does project and fabrication work, is issuing up to 27,000,000 new shares, mostly for ₹111.0 crore of working capital. Revenue rose from ₹315.3 crore in FY23 to ₹475.0 crore in FY25, with ten customers providing about 90%, and a workforce of over 7,000 whose project staff turn over almost entirely each year.

Monomark Engineering (India) IPO: key figures

From the offer document; each figure is cited in the study below. Placings are among the 231 mainboard issues newboard has studied

Growth

Revenue CAGR FY23 to FY25
22.7%higher than 45% of studied issues
PAT CAGR FY23 to FY25
85.6%higher than 68% of studied issues
EBITDA margin FY23 → FY25
5.5% → 8.3%higher than 18% of studied issues

Issue

Fresh issue
27,000,000 shares
Offer for sale
none

Concentration

Largest customer
35.7% of FY25 revenuehigher than 74% of studied issues
Top ten customers
87.7% of FY25 revenuehigher than 85% of studied issues

Balance sheet

Debt to equity FY25
1.2×

Worth reading

Operating cash flow FY25
₹16.8 cr
Contingent liabilities
₹65.2 cr
Cases against promoters
1 criminal, 3 tax
Working-capital days FY25
12higher than 8% of studied issues

Share an interesting fact, not just a link

Pick one. The post writes itself, with the page the figure is on and the picture to go with it.

Send itWhatsAppXLinkedInTelegram Card
On this page (25 sections)
  1. Key figures
  2. The study
  3. At a glance
  4. The business, in plain words
  5. Where the money comes from
  6. The growth record
  7. What the growth is made of
  8. Earnings quality
  9. The balance sheet
  10. What the money is for
  11. Who is selling
  12. Promoters
  13. Who already owns it
  14. What changed just before the IPO
  15. Capacity and expansion
  16. Market size and industry structure
  17. Competitive position
  18. Peers the company named
  19. Risks, in plain words
  20. Litigation and regulatory matters
  21. Related-party transactions
  22. What the offer document does not say
  23. Five questions for management
  24. Before the IPO
  25. Questions answered

Monomark Engineering (India) Limited : what the offer document says

Published 8 Nov 2026 · 2,159 words · read from the DRHP

01At a glance

What the company does: provides industrial operations and maintenance (O&M) crews inside clients' plants, executes industrial projects, and does metal fabrication at its own workshop near Chittorgarh (AP p.2).

Who pays it: large metal, cement, port and engineering companies; named top-ten customers in the six months to September 2025 include Vedanta, Runaya Green Tech, Kutch Copper, Hindustan Copper and Adani Ports and SEZ (DRHP p.29). The largest customer was 33.92% of revenue in that period and the top ten 90.16% (DRHP p.29).

Why it is raising money: ₹1,110.00 million for working capital, and the rest for general purposes (AP p.4).

How fast it has grown: revenue from ₹3,153 million in FY23 to ₹4,750 million in FY25, and ₹2,579 million in the six months to September 2025 (AP p.5).

The one thing to understand: a labour business. Employee costs were 61.35% of total expenses in the six months to September 2025, the company had 7,210 employees, and attrition among project-specific staff was 90.93% in FY25 (AP p.6, AP p.7).

02The business, in plain words

An industrial O&M contractor supplies trained crews and supervisors to run and maintain equipment in a client's smelter, cement plant or port, under a contract priced per job or per period. The client owns the plant; the contractor provides the people, consumables and spares.

A copper smelter needs its maintenance shop run round the clock → it awards an O&M contract to Monomark → the company deploys technicians and supervisors on site, with consumables and spares → it bills monthly under the contract.

Metal and cement customers were 93.29% of revenue in the six months to September 2025 (AP p.7). The company works across seven states and has set up a subsidiary in the UAE, Monomark Engineering FZE (AP p.2).

Earnings equation: Profit ≈ contract billings − wages and site costs − consumables − interest. EBITDA margin was 9.19% in the six months (AP p.6).

03Where the money comes from

Revenue, ₹ millionFY23FY24FY25H1 FY26
Industrial O&M services2,064.992,497.443,128.591,996.10
Industrial project execution816.241,129.391,291.49485.33
Metal fabrication272.09271.76321.3281.98
Total3,153.313,898.604,750.322,579.22

Source: DRHP p.167. Converted from ₹ lakh. H1 FY26 is six months; small "others" revenue is included in the total.

Share of revenueFY23FY24FY25H1 FY26
Largest customer47.84%42.01%35.74%33.92%
Top five customers77.20%75.44%75.08%78.49%
Top ten customers91.01%86.91%87.67%90.16%

Source: DRHP p.29.

04The growth record

₹ million, restatedFY23FY24FY25H1 FY26
Revenue from operations3,153.313,898.604,750.322,579.22
EBITDA172.12318.85392.64237.03
EBITDA margin5.46%8.18%8.27%9.19%
Profit after tax52.86148.26182.13123.64
Cash from operations(79.20)146.45167.77(20.06)

Source: AP p.5, AP p.6. Converted from ₹ lakh. FY23 is standalone; later periods are consolidated.

Trade receivables were held for 48 days in FY23, 51 days in FY24 and 38 days in FY25 (DRHP p.112).

05What the growth is made of

O&M contracts. O&M revenue rose from ₹2,065 million in FY23 to ₹3,129 million in FY25 and reached 77.39% of revenue in the six months to September 2025 (DRHP p.167). O&M had a gross margin of 15.92% in those six months against 6.65% for fabrication (AP p.7). Repeat clients were 90.51% of business (AP p.6). The order book was ₹10,953.50 million at 28 February 2026, 2.3 times FY25 revenue (our arithmetic, AP p.7).

06Earnings quality

Operating cash flow was negative in FY23 and in the six months to September 2025 (AP p.6). Net working capital days rose from 12 in FY25 to 37 in the six months (AP p.6). Contingent liabilities were ₹652.38 million at September 2025, 60.63% of net worth (AP p.7, AP p.8). There are no auditor qualifications that have not been given effect in the restated accounts (AP p.8).

07The balance sheet

₹ millionMar 2023Mar 2024Mar 2025Sep 2025
Net worth502.58601.08732.581,075.92
Total borrowings732.48801.63847.74904.02

Source: AP p.5, AP p.6. Converted from ₹ lakh.

On 2 July 2025 the company placed 5,953,000 shares at ₹38 each with 31 investors outside the promoter group, raising ₹226.2 million (DRHP p.88, DRHP p.89). Before that, the four promoters received bonus shares (DRHP p.88).

08What the money is for

Use of net proceeds₹ million
Working capital1,110.00
General corporate purposesnot yet stated

Source: AP p.4. Converted from ₹ lakh.

09Who is selling

Nobody. The offer is a fresh issue only, of up to 27,000,000 shares of ₹10 face value (AP p.1). The promoters acquired no shares in the last three years other than through the bonus issue, at nil cost (AP p.8).

10Promoters

The promoters are Narendra Chordia, Meena Chordia, Nitesh Chordia and Gaurav Chordia (AP p.3). Narendra Chordia, chairman and managing director, started Monomark Engineering Works in 1987, founded the company in 2005 and moved it into O&M in 2013 (AP p.3, AP p.4). Meena Chordia has been a director since 2005 and became a whole-time director in 2025 (AP p.4). Nitesh Chordia, a commerce and law graduate, joined as an accounts executive in 2015 and is a whole-time director (AP p.4). Gaurav Chordia, a whole-time director, holds a BTech from IIT Delhi and an MBA from London Business School, and is a CFA charterholder (AP p.4).

Remuneration to the four promoters as directors was ₹17.46 million in FY23 and ₹24.60 million in FY25 (our arithmetic, DRHP p.77).

11Who already owns it

Holder, before the offerShare
Narendra Chordia45.62%
Meena Chordia30.42%
Nitesh Chordia8.64%
Gaurav Chordia6.69%
Other shareholders8.63%

Source: AP p.5. The last row is our arithmetic.

The four promoters hold 91.37% (our arithmetic, AP p.5). The largest outside holders are Rashmi Jain at 0.79% and Umesh Kumar Jain at 0.77% (AP p.5).

12What changed just before the IPO

  • Private placement: ₹226.2 million from 31 investors at ₹38 a share in July 2025 (DRHP p.89).
  • Bonus issue: to the promoters (DRHP p.88).
  • Concentration: the largest customer's share has fallen from 47.84% to 33.92% since FY23 (DRHP p.29).
  • Mix: O&M up to 77% of revenue (DRHP p.167).
  • Bonus ratio: the May 2025 bonus was six shares for every one held, allotted on 26 May 2025 (DRHP p.88).
  • Auditor change: Dinesh Sisodia & Co. resigned as statutory auditor on 30 April 2025 and Keyur Shah & Associates was appointed on 24 May 2025 (DRHP p.81, DRHP p.82).
  • Public company: the company converted from a private to a public limited company, with a fresh certificate of incorporation dated 15 September 2025 (DRHP p.78).

13Capacity and expansion

Capacity here is people and site teams, plus a fabrication workshop at Village Samrathpura, Kapasan, Chittorgarh (AP p.2). The company undertook 40 projects in the six months to September 2025 (AP p.7). The proceeds fund working capital, not plant (AP p.4).

14Market size and industry structure

The industry report cited in the offer document describes O&M, project execution and metal fabrication as services that support plant uptime and infrastructure in metals, cement, power and ports (AP p.3). newboard has not tested the report's statements.

15Competitive position

What the document claims, and what it rests on:

  • Integrated services across O&M, project execution and fabrication (AP p.3).
  • Repeat orders: about 90% of business from repeat clients (AP p.6).
  • An order book of ₹10,954 million (AP p.7).

Against that: a few large clients in two industries, very high staff turnover and a history of workplace accidents (AP p.7, DRHP p.34).

16Peers the company named

Company, FY25Total revenue, ₹ mnP/ERoNW
Monomark Engineering (India)4,750.32-24.86%
Thermax103,886.9056.6812.68%
Power Mech Projects52,341.4018.2016.09%
Thejo Engineering5,527.3633.8916.33%
ANI Integrated Services2,274.647.5412.76%

Source: DRHP p.121. Converted from ₹ lakh. Peer P/E uses prices on 24 March 2026.

No P/E is possible for the company until a price band is set.

17Risks, in plain words

  • Customers. Ten customers were 90% of recent revenue (AP p.7).
  • Industries. Metals and cement were 93% (AP p.7).
  • People. Project-staff attrition of 90.93% in FY25 (AP p.7).
  • Safety. Workplace accidents, including fatalities: 1 incident in FY23, 1 in FY24, 14 in FY25 and 3 in the six months to September 2025 (DRHP p.34).
  • Inventory at client sites. Consumables and spares held where the company has limited control (AP p.7).
  • Contingent liabilities. 61% of net worth (AP p.7, AP p.8).

18Litigation and regulatory matters

Proceedings outstandingCount₹ million
Against the company, criminal, tax1, 312.55
Against promoters, criminal, tax1, 30.75
By directors, criminal12.00
Against directors, criminal1not quantified

Source: AP p.9. Converted from ₹ lakh.

20What the offer document does not say

In the sections read for this study, the document does not give:

  • Who the largest customer is, at 34% of recent revenue.
  • How many of the workplace incidents were fatal, in the pages read.
  • What the criminal proceedings against the company and a promoter concern.
  • What makes up ₹652 million of contingent liabilities, in the pages read.
  • The price band, lot size or issue dates, which is normal at DRHP stage.

21Five questions for management

  1. What caused 14 workplace incidents in FY25, and what has changed since?
  2. How does the company run sites with project-staff attrition near 90%?
  3. Who is the largest customer, and when do its contracts come up for renewal?
  4. What are the ₹652 million of contingent liabilities?
  5. How was the ₹38 placement price in July 2025 set, and who are the placees?

2Sources and cited facts

This study was read from 2 documents the company filed. The 62 figures it cites are listed under the document each came from, with the page and the sentence as printed.

Show all 62 cited facts, with the page and the sentence as printed
  1. 1
    At a glanceWhat the company does, provides industrial operations and maintenance (O&M) crews inside clients' plants, executes industrial projects, and does metal fabrication at its own workshop near Chittorgarh (AP p.2).p.2

    “What the company does, provides industrial operations and maintenance (O&M) crews inside clients' plants, executes industrial projects, and does metal fabrication at its own workshop near Chittorgarh (AP p.2).”

  2. 4
    At a glanceWhy it is raising money, ₹1,110.00 million for working capital, and the rest for general purposes (AP p.4).p.4

    “Why it is raising money, ₹1,110.00 million for working capital, and the rest for general purposes (AP p.4).”

  3. 5
    At a glanceHow fast it has grown, revenue from ₹3,153 million in FY23 to ₹4,750 million in FY25, and ₹2,579 million in the six months to September 2025 (AP p.5).p.5

    “How fast it has grown, revenue from ₹3,153 million in FY23 to ₹4,750 million in FY25, and ₹2,579 million in the six months to September 2025 (AP p.5).”

  4. 6
    The business, in plain wordsMetal and cement customers were 93.29% of revenue in the six months to September 2025 (AP p.7).p.7

    “Metal and cement customers were 93.29% of revenue in the six months to September 2025 (AP p.7).”

  5. 7
    The business, in plain wordsThe company works across seven states and has set up a subsidiary in the UAE, Monomark Engineering FZE (AP p.2).p.2

    “The company works across seven states and has set up a subsidiary in the UAE, Monomark Engineering FZE (AP p.2).”

  6. 8
    The business, in plain wordsEBITDA margin was 9.19% in the six months (AP p.6).p.6

    “EBITDA margin was 9.19% in the six months (AP p.6).”

  7. 11
    What the growth is made ofO&M had a gross margin of 15.92% in those six months against 6.65% for fabrication (AP p.7).p.7

    “O&M had a gross margin of 15.92% in those six months against 6.65% for fabrication (AP p.7).”

  8. 12
    What the growth is made ofRepeat clients were 90.51% of business (AP p.6).p.6

    “Repeat clients were 90.51% of business (AP p.6).”

  9. 13
    Earnings qualityOperating cash flow was negative in FY23 and in the six months to September 2025 (AP p.6).p.6

    “Operating cash flow was negative in FY23 and in the six months to September 2025 (AP p.6).”

  10. 14
    Earnings qualityNet working capital days rose from 12 in FY25 to 37 in the six months (AP p.6).p.6

    “Net working capital days rose from 12 in FY25 to 37 in the six months (AP p.6).”

  11. 15
    Earnings qualityThere are no auditor qualifications that have not been given effect in the restated accounts (AP p.8).p.8

    “There are no auditor qualifications that have not been given effect in the restated accounts (AP p.8).”

  12. 17
    Who is sellingThe offer is a fresh issue only, of up to 27,000,000 shares of ₹10 face value (AP p.1).p.1

    “The offer is a fresh issue only, of up to 27,000,000 shares of ₹10 face value (AP p.1).”

  13. 18
    Who is sellingThe promoters acquired no shares in the last three years other than through the bonus issue, at nil cost (AP p.8).p.8

    “The promoters acquired no shares in the last three years other than through the bonus issue, at nil cost (AP p.8).”

  14. 19
    PromotersThe promoters are Narendra Chordia, Meena Chordia, Nitesh Chordia and Gaurav Chordia (AP p.3).p.3

    “The promoters are Narendra Chordia, Meena Chordia, Nitesh Chordia and Gaurav Chordia (AP p.3).”

  15. 20
    PromotersMeena Chordia has been a director since 2005 and became a whole-time director in 2025 (AP p.4).p.4

    “Meena Chordia has been a director since 2005 and became a whole-time director in 2025 (AP p.4).”

  16. 21
    PromotersNitesh Chordia, a commerce and law graduate, joined as an accounts executive in 2015 and is a whole-time director (AP p.4).p.4

    “Nitesh Chordia, a commerce and law graduate, joined as an accounts executive in 2015 and is a whole-time director (AP p.4).”

  17. 22
    PromotersGaurav Chordia, a whole-time director, holds a BTech from IIT Delhi and an MBA from London Business School, and is a CFA charterholder (AP p.4).p.4

    “Gaurav Chordia, a whole-time director, holds a BTech from IIT Delhi and an MBA from London Business School, and is a CFA charterholder (AP p.4).”

  18. 23
    Who already owns itThe largest outside holders are Rashmi Jain at 0.79% and Umesh Kumar Jain at 0.77% (AP p.5).p.5

    “The largest outside holders are Rashmi Jain at 0.79% and Umesh Kumar Jain at 0.77% (AP p.5).”

  19. 30
    Capacity and expansionCapacity here is people and site teams, plus a fabrication workshop at Village Samrathpura, Kapasan, Chittorgarh (AP p.2).p.2

    “Capacity here is people and site teams, plus a fabrication workshop at Village Samrathpura, Kapasan, Chittorgarh (AP p.2).”

  20. 31
    Capacity and expansionThe company undertook 40 projects in the six months to September 2025 (AP p.7).p.7

    “The company undertook 40 projects in the six months to September 2025 (AP p.7).”

  21. 32
    Capacity and expansionThe proceeds fund working capital, not plant (AP p.4).p.4

    “The proceeds fund working capital, not plant (AP p.4).”

  22. 33
    Market size and industry structureThe industry report cited in the offer document describes O&M, project execution and metal fabrication as services that support plant uptime and infrastructure in metals, cement, power and ports (AP p.3).p.3

    “The industry report cited in the offer document describes O&M, project execution and metal fabrication as services that support plant uptime and infrastructure in metals, cement, power and ports (AP p.3).”

  23. 34
    Competitive positionIntegrated services across O&M, project execution and fabrication (AP p.3).p.3

    “Integrated services across O&M, project execution and fabrication (AP p.3).”

  24. 35
    Competitive positionRepeat orders, about 90% of business from repeat clients (AP p.6).p.6

    “Repeat orders, about 90% of business from repeat clients (AP p.6).”

  25. 36
    Competitive positionAn order book of ₹10,954 million (AP p.7).p.7

    “An order book of ₹10,954 million (AP p.7).”

  26. 37
    Risks, in plain wordsCustomers. Ten customers were 90% of recent revenue (AP p.7).p.7

    “Customers. Ten customers were 90% of recent revenue (AP p.7).”

  27. 38
    Risks, in plain wordsIndustries. Metals and cement were 93% (AP p.7).p.7

    “Industries. Metals and cement were 93% (AP p.7).”

  28. 39
    Risks, in plain wordsPeople. Project-staff attrition of 90.93% in FY25 (AP p.7).p.7

    “People. Project-staff attrition of 90.93% in FY25 (AP p.7).”

  29. 41
    Risks, in plain wordsInventory at client sites. Consumables and spares held where the company has limited control (AP p.7).p.7

    “Inventory at client sites. Consumables and spares held where the company has limited control (AP p.7).”

  30. 42
    Key figuresGrowth | EBITDA margin FY23 → FY25 | 5.5% → 8.3% | (AP p.6)p.6

    “Growth | EBITDA margin FY23 → FY25 | 5.5% → 8.3% | (AP p.6)”

  31. 43
    Key figuresIssue | Fresh issue | 27,000,000 shares | (AP p.1)p.1

    “Issue | Fresh issue | 27,000,000 shares | (AP p.1)”

  32. 44
    Key figuresIssue | Offer for sale | none | (AP p.1)p.1

    “Issue | Offer for sale | none | (AP p.1)”

  33. 47
    Key figuresWorth reading | Operating cash flow FY25 | ₹16.8 cr | (AP p.6)p.6

    “Worth reading | Operating cash flow FY25 | ₹16.8 cr | (AP p.6)”

  34. 48
    Key figuresWorth reading | Contingent liabilities | ₹65.2 cr | (AP p.7)p.7

    “Worth reading | Contingent liabilities | ₹65.2 cr | (AP p.7)”

  35. 49
    Key figuresWorth reading | Cases against promoters | 1 criminal, 3 tax | (AP p.9)p.9

    “Worth reading | Cases against promoters | 1 criminal, 3 tax | (AP p.9)”

  36. 50
    Key figuresWorth reading | Working-capital days FY25 | 12 | (AP p.6)p.6

    “Worth reading | Working-capital days FY25 | 12 | (AP p.6)”

  37. 51
    Key figuresBefore the IPO | Revenue FY23 → FY25 | ₹315.3 cr → ₹475.0 cr | (AP p.5)p.5

    “Before the IPO | Revenue FY23 → FY25 | ₹315.3 cr → ₹475.0 cr | (AP p.5)”

  38. 52
    Key figuresBefore the IPO | PAT FY23 → FY25 | ₹5.3 cr → ₹18.2 cr | (AP p.6)p.6

    “Before the IPO | PAT FY23 → FY25 | ₹5.3 cr → ₹18.2 cr | (AP p.6)”

  39. 58
    Key figuresWho is involved | Industry | Capital goods and engineering | (AP p.2)p.2

    “Who is involved | Industry | Capital goods and engineering | (AP p.2)”

  40. 59
    Key figuresWho is involved | Promoter | Narendra Chordia | (AP p.3)p.3

    “Who is involved | Promoter | Narendra Chordia | (AP p.3)”

  41. 60
    Key figuresWho is involved | Promoter | Meena Chordia | (AP p.3)p.3

    “Who is involved | Promoter | Meena Chordia | (AP p.3)”

  42. 61
    Key figuresWho is involved | Promoter | Nitesh Chordia | (AP p.3)p.3

    “Who is involved | Promoter | Nitesh Chordia | (AP p.3)”

  43. 62
    Key figuresWho is involved | Promoter | Gaurav Chordia | (AP p.3)p.3

    “Who is involved | Promoter | Gaurav Chordia | (AP p.3)”

Monomark Engineering (India) Limited DRHPdrhp · filed 2026-03-3019 facts
  1. 2
    At a glanceWho pays it, large metal, cement, port and engineering companies; named top-ten customers in the six months to September 2025 include Vedanta, Runaya Green Tech, Kutch Copper, Hindustan Copper and Adani Ports and SEZ (DRHP p.29).p.29

    “Who pays it, large metal, cement, port and engineering companies; named top-ten customers in the six months to September 2025 include Vedanta, Runaya Green Tech, Kutch Copper, Hindustan Copper and Adani Ports and SEZ (DRHP p.29).”

  2. 3
    At a glanceThe largest customer was 33.92% of revenue in that period and the top ten 90.16% (DRHP p.29).p.29

    “The largest customer was 33.92% of revenue in that period and the top ten 90.16% (DRHP p.29).”

  3. 9
    The growth recordTrade receivables were held for 48 days in FY23, 51 days in FY24 and 38 days in FY25 (DRHP p.112).p.112

    “Trade receivables were held for 48 days in FY23, 51 days in FY24 and 38 days in FY25 (DRHP p.112).”

  4. 10
    What the growth is made ofO&M revenue rose from ₹2,065 million in FY23 to ₹3,129 million in FY25 and reached 77.39% of revenue in the six months to September 2025 (DRHP p.167).p.167

    “O&M revenue rose from ₹2,065 million in FY23 to ₹3,129 million in FY25 and reached 77.39% of revenue in the six months to September 2025 (DRHP p.167).”

  5. 16
    The balance sheetBefore that, the four promoters received bonus shares (DRHP p.88).p.88

    “Before that, the four promoters received bonus shares (DRHP p.88).”

  6. 24
    What changed just before the IPOPrivate placement, ₹226.2 million from 31 investors at ₹38 a share in July 2025 (DRHP p.89).p.89

    “Private placement, ₹226.2 million from 31 investors at ₹38 a share in July 2025 (DRHP p.89).”

  7. 25
    What changed just before the IPOBonus issue, to the promoters (DRHP p.88).p.88

    “Bonus issue, to the promoters (DRHP p.88).”

  8. 26
    What changed just before the IPOConcentration, the largest customer's share has fallen from 47.84% to 33.92% since FY23 (DRHP p.29).p.29

    “Concentration, the largest customer's share has fallen from 47.84% to 33.92% since FY23 (DRHP p.29).”

  9. 27
    What changed just before the IPOMix, O&M up to 77% of revenue (DRHP p.167).p.167

    “Mix, O&M up to 77% of revenue (DRHP p.167).”

  10. 28
    What changed just before the IPOBonus ratio: the May 2025 bonus was six shares for every one held, allotted on 26 May 2025 (DRHP p.88).p.88

    “Bonus ratio: the May 2025 bonus was six shares for every one held, allotted on 26 May 2025 (DRHP p.88).”

  11. 29
    What changed just before the IPOPublic company: the company converted from a private to a public limited company, with a fresh certificate of incorporation dated 15 September 2025 (DRHP p.78).p.78

    “Public company: the company converted from a private to a public limited company, with a fresh certificate of incorporation dated 15 September 2025 (DRHP p.78).”

  12. 40
    Risks, in plain wordsSafety. Workplace accidents, including fatalities: 1 incident in FY23, 1 in FY24, 14 in FY25 and 3 in the six months to September 2025 (DRHP p.34).p.34

    “Safety. Workplace accidents, including fatalities: 1 incident in FY23, 1 in FY24, 14 in FY25 and 3 in the six months to September 2025 (DRHP p.34).”

  13. 45
    Key figuresConcentration | Largest customer | 35.7% of FY25 revenue | (DRHP p.29)p.29

    “Concentration | Largest customer | 35.7% of FY25 revenue | (DRHP p.29)”

  14. 46
    Key figuresConcentration | Top ten customers | 87.7% of FY25 revenue | (DRHP p.29)p.29

    “Concentration | Top ten customers | 87.7% of FY25 revenue | (DRHP p.29)”

  15. 53
    Key figuresBefore the IPO | Receivable days FY23 → FY25 | 48 → 38 | (DRHP p.112)p.112

    “Before the IPO | Receivable days FY23 → FY25 | 48 → 38 | (DRHP p.112)”

  16. 54
    Key figuresBefore the IPO | Bonus issue | 6:1, May 2025 | (DRHP p.88)p.88

    “Before the IPO | Bonus issue | 6:1, May 2025 | (DRHP p.88)”

  17. 55
    Key figuresBefore the IPO | Pre-IPO placement | ₹38 a share, July 2025 | (DRHP p.89)p.89

    “Before the IPO | Pre-IPO placement | ₹38 a share, July 2025 | (DRHP p.89)”

  18. 56
    Key figuresBefore the IPO | Last allotment before the IPO | ₹38 a share, July 2025 | (DRHP p.89)p.89

    “Before the IPO | Last allotment before the IPO | ₹38 a share, July 2025 | (DRHP p.89)”

  19. 57
    Key figuresBefore the IPO | Converted to a public company | September 2025 | (DRHP p.78)p.78

    “Before the IPO | Converted to a public company | September 2025 | (DRHP p.78)”

Monomark Engineering (India) IPO: before the IPO

The record up to the issue and what changed in the company's capital and auditors, from the offer document.

Revenue FY23 → FY25
₹315.3 cr → ₹475.0 cr
PAT FY23 → FY25
₹5.3 cr → ₹18.2 cr
Receivable days FY23 → FY25
48 → 38
Promoter remuneration FY23 → FY25
₹1.7 cr → ₹2.5 cr
Bonus issue
6:1, May 2025
Pre-IPO placement
₹38 a share, July 2025
Last allotment before the IPO
₹38 a share, July 2025
Auditor change
Dinesh Sisodia & Co. to Keyur Shah & Associates, 2025
Converted to a public company
September 2025

What changed just before the IPO, in the study

Monomark Engineering (India) IPO: checks

Factual conditions, each with a fixed threshold, read from the key figures. A condition met is a fact to read up on in the study, not a verdict on the issue; meeting none is not a verdict either.

  • Profit grew much faster than revenue

    Profit grew 85.6% a year against revenue's 22.7%.

  • Revenue depends on few customers

    The largest customer is 35.7% of revenue; the top ten are 87.7%.

  • Cases against promoters

    Cases against promoters: 1 criminal, 3 tax.

Monomark Engineering (India) IPO: questions answered

When will the Monomark Engineering (India) IPO open?

No dates or price band yet. The company filed its draft offer document on 30 Mar 2026. The dates and the band come with the red herring prospectus, after SEBI has reviewed the draft.

What are Monomark Engineering (India)'s financials?

Revenue went ₹315.3 cr to ₹475.0 cr (FY23 to FY25), 22.7% a year. Profit after tax went ₹5.3 cr to ₹18.2 cr (FY23 to FY25), 85.6% a year. All figures are from the offer document's restated statements.

The growth record, in the study

How much of Monomark Engineering (India)'s revenue comes from its largest customer?

The largest customer brought 35.7% of FY25 revenue, and the top ten customers 87.7%, as the offer document gives it. The study shows the years before and whether the customers are named.

Where the money comes from, in the study

Is the Monomark Engineering (India) IPO a fresh issue or an offer for sale?

A fresh issue of ₹0 crore, which goes to the company.

Who is selling, in the study

What is the Monomark Engineering (India) IPO GMP?

newboard does not publish a grey-market premium. Grey-market deals happen outside the stock exchanges, are not regulated, and leave no public record of who traded at what price. What is on record is the offer document, read on this page, and the exchanges' bid book.

Monomark Engineering (India) IPO: the next step, on Telegram

A message when there is news on its price band, bidding, allotment status, listing day and use-of-proceeds reports. Free, no account, leave in one tap. Send /stop to end it.

Not on this page yet: the peer table the issuer printed. Each is added when the pipeline extracts it from the offer document.

The figures on this page are the company's own, taken from its filings with the exchanges and SEBI, and every number links to the document and page it came from. They are reproduced as stated, not verified independently, and they are not forecasts by newboard.in. Nothing here is investment advice, a research report or a recommendation. newboard.in is not a SEBI-registered research analyst or investment adviser.