Sai Infinium Limited IPO
Metals and mining · DRHP 24 Sept 2026
Follow this IPOband, bidding, allotment and listing, on Telegram
- DRHP filed
- 24 Sept 2026
A Bhavnagar, Gujarat maker of TMT bars, MS billets and, since February 2026, structural steel sections proposes a fresh issue of up to ₹280.0 crore, ₹210.0 crore of it for a new billet melting shop, and an offer for sale of up to 12,000,000 shares by the promoter Ishu Bansal. Revenue rose from ₹468.2 crore in FY24 to ₹689.2 crore in FY26 and profit after tax from ₹6.1 crore to ₹82.4 crore.
Sai Infinium IPO: key figures
From the offer document; each figure is cited in the study below. Placings are among the 221 mainboard issues newboard has studied
Growth
- Revenue CAGR FY24 to FY26
- 21.3%higher than 41% of studied issues
- PAT CAGR FY24 to FY26
- 266.3%higher than 90% of studied issues
- EBITDA margin FY24 → FY26
- 5.9% → 18.6%higher than 68% of studied issues
Issue
- Fresh issue
- ₹280.0 cr
- Offer for sale
- 12,000,000 shares by one promoter
- Promoter holding before the issue
- 92.0%
Concentration
- Largest customer
- 18.6% of FY26 revenuehigher than 30% of studied issues
- Top ten customers
- 63.8% of FY26 revenuehigher than 49% of studied issues
- Top ten suppliers
- 64.0% of FY26 purchases
- Gujarat
- 99.7% of FY26 revenue
Balance sheet
- Net debt / EBITDA
- 2.6×
- Debt to equity FY26
- 0.9×
- ROCE FY26
- 16.7%higher than 22% of studied issues
Worth reading
- Operating cash flow FY26
- ₹82.5 cr
- Other income, share of profit before tax FY26
- 6.4%
- Related-party sales FY26
- ₹159.3 cr
- Contingent liabilities
- ₹89.0 cr
- Working-capital days FY26
- 28higher than 12% of studied issues
- Other operating income FY26
- 27.5% of revenue
Share an interesting fact, not just a link
Pick one. The post writes itself, with the page the figure is on and the picture to go with it.
On this page (25 sections)
- Key figures
- The study
- At a glance
- The business, in plain words
- Where the money comes from
- The growth record
- What the growth is made of
- Earnings quality
- The balance sheet
- What the money is for
- Who is selling
- Promoters
- Who already owns it
- What changed just before the IPO
- Capacity and expansion
- Market size and industry structure
- Competitive position
- Peers the company named
- Risks, in plain words
- Litigation and regulatory matters
- Related-party transactions
- What the offer document does not say
- Five questions for management
- Before the IPO
- Questions answered
Sai Infinium Limited: what the offer document says
Published 2 Oct 2026 · 4,221 words · read from the DRHP
01At a glance
What the company does: manufactures TMT bars, structural steel products (angles, beams, channels, flats) and MS billets at one plant at Chamardi village near Bhavnagar, and also trades ferrous and non-ferrous scrap, holds a ship recycling yard at Alang and deals in real estate (AP p.3, DRHP p.293).
Who pays it: builders and fabricators through 222 dealers in Gujarat, 4 in Punjab and 5 distributors in Gujarat, Rajasthan and Punjab (DRHP p.293). Gujarat was 99.74% of FY26 revenue (DRHP p.40). The largest customer, Metarex Global Private Limited, was 18.59% of FY26 revenue and the promoter company Devansh Infinium Private Limited was 15.77% (DRHP p.43).
Why it is raising money: ₹2,100.00 million (₹210.0 crore) of the ₹2,800.00 million (₹280.0 crore) fresh issue is for a 50 tonne induction melting system to double billet capacity, with the rest for general corporate purposes (DRHP p.155). The offer for sale proceeds go to Ishu Bansal, not the company (DRHP p.155).
How fast it has grown: revenue from ₹4,682.07 million in FY24 to ₹6,891.62 million in FY26, a CAGR of 21.3%; profit after tax from ₹61.38 million to ₹823.79 million, a CAGR of 266.3% (our arithmetic, DRHP p.111).
The one thing to understand: the FY26 rise in revenue came from "other operating income", chiefly non-ferrous scrap sales of ₹1,519.78 million on 721.46 tonnes, against ₹65.12 million on 370.96 tonnes in FY25 (DRHP p.299). Without other operating income, revenue was ₹4,996.97 million in FY26 against ₹5,046.41 million in FY25, a fall of 1.0% (our arithmetic, DRHP p.41).
02The business, in plain words
The company melts sponge iron and steel scrap in induction furnaces to cast MS billets (semi-finished square steel lengths), then rolls those billets into TMT reinforcement bars in one mill and into structural sections in a second mill that began production in February 2026 (DRHP p.293, DRHP p.297). It also buys billets in the open market to roll (DRHP p.300).
A builder or dealer needs reinforcement bars → it orders "Bandhan" TMT bars → the company melts scrap and sponge iron into billets and rolls them → it is paid per tonne.
Next to steel, the company sells scrap and raw materials it does not use, trades metals, and holds 43 unsold commercial properties worth ₹56.99 million at March 2026 (DRHP p.298, DRHP p.299). Its ship recycling yard at Alang, with 30,000 LDT of annual capacity, broke no ships in FY24, FY25 or FY26; the last ship was bought in November 2023 by a company since merged in (DRHP p.298).
Earnings equation: Revenue from TMT bars = tonnes sold × realisation per tonne. In FY26 that was 85,093.17 tonnes × ₹44,981.64 = ₹3,827.63 million (DRHP p.296). Materials cost ₹4,698.87 million, 68.2% of revenue (our arithmetic, DRHP p.509).
03Where the money comes from
| Share of revenue | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|
| TMT bars | 61.38% | 76.76% | 55.54% |
| MS billets | 28.43% | 5.95% | 5.68% |
| Structural steel products | - | - | 5.22% |
| Other operating income (scrap, raw material sales) | 5.15% | 4.55% | 27.49% |
| Stock-in-trade | 4.50% | 10.90% | 6.02% |
Source: DRHP p.41. Ship recycling was 1.83% of FY25 revenue and real estate under 1% in each year (DRHP p.41).
| Share of revenue | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Largest customer | 10.82% | 54.27% | 18.59% |
| Top ten customers | 38.05% | 84.31% | 63.83% |
| Gujarat | 100.00% | 100.00% | 99.74% |
Source: DRHP p.40, DRHP p.42. In FY25 the largest customer was Devansh Infinium Private Limited, a promoter, at 54.27% (DRHP p.43).
Revenue depends on a few buyers, several of them tied to the promoters. In FY26 the top ten included Devansh Infinium Private Limited (15.77%), Falvi Infinium LLP (6.75%), Sai Endeavours Private Limited (4.40%) and Axat Impex LLP (3.48%) (DRHP p.43). Metarex Global Private Limited, the largest FY26 customer, was formerly Devansh Endeavours Private Limited; Shivnarayan Bansal resigned as its director on May 28, 2025 (DRHP p.397). The ten largest suppliers were 63.98% of FY26 purchases (DRHP p.33).
04The growth record
| ₹ million, restated | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from operations | 4,682.07 | 5,286.74 | 6,891.62 |
| EBITDA | 276.70 | 537.89 | 1,281.88 |
| EBITDA margin | 5.91% | 10.17% | 18.60% |
| Profit after tax | 61.38 | 437.48 | 823.79 |
| Operating cash flow | (165.48) | (276.77) | 825.25 |
| Total borrowings | 906.79 | 686.34 | 3,575.72 |
Source: DRHP p.111, DRHP p.112, AP p.7, DRHP p.184. Net worth as the company defines it was ₹1,939.38 million, ₹3,257.54 million and ₹4,593.98 million; return on equity 4.84%, 16.91% and 21.00%; return on capital employed 8.47%, 20.88% and 16.73% (DRHP p.184).
Revenue CAGR FY24 to FY26 was 21.3%, EBITDA CAGR 115.2% and PAT CAGR 266.3% (our arithmetic, DRHP p.111). EBITDA margin moved from 5.9% to 18.6%, up 1,269 basis points (DRHP p.184).
Two presentation points. Total equity on the balance sheet was ₹3,923.10 million at March 2026, ₹670.88 million below the "net worth" KPI in every year, because that KPI leaves out a reserve arising on the 2024 merger (our arithmetic, DRHP p.109, DRHP p.184). The summary profit and loss page prints FY26 EPS as ₹1.59 and FY25 as ₹2.80, the reverse of the ₹2.80 and ₹1.59 given elsewhere (DRHP p.111, DRHP p.182).
05What the growth is made of
FY24 to FY25: TMT bar volume rose from 57,944 to 86,651.76 tonnes while realisation fell from ₹49,598.06 to ₹46,829.40 a tonne, and billet sales fell from 29,860 to 7,558.19 tonnes (DRHP p.296). Revenue rose 12.91% (DRHP p.184).
FY25 to FY26: TMT bar volume fell 1.80% to 85,093.17 tonnes and realisation fell 3.95% to ₹44,981.64 a tonne; billets rose to 9,948.78 tonnes; structural products added 5,977.67 tonnes at ₹60,162.24 a tonne in two months (DRHP p.296, DRHP p.297, DRHP p.535). Manufactured goods revenue rose only ₹206.37 million; other operating income rose ₹1,654.31 million (DRHP p.534).
Read from the filing: the FY26 increase is almost entirely scrap and raw material sales. Non-ferrous scrap brought ₹1,519.78 million on 721.46 tonnes in FY26, about ₹2.1 million a tonne, against about ₹0.18 million a tonne on 370.96 tonnes in FY25 and ₹0.17 million a tonne on 956.84 tonnes in FY24 (our arithmetic, DRHP p.299). The document says the scrap includes aluminium, brass, moly and nickel, but does not explain the change in value per tonne or name the buyers of that scrap (DRHP p.298).
06Earnings quality
| Indicator | What the document shows |
|---|---|
| PAT against operating cash flow | PAT ₹1,322.65 million over FY24 to FY26 against operating cash flow of ₹383.00 million (our arithmetic, DRHP p.111, DRHP p.112) |
| Receivable days | 34.11 in FY24, 30.16 in FY25, 12.32 in FY26 (DRHP p.510) |
| Inventory days | 84.34, 136.14, 41.81 (DRHP p.510) |
| Payable days | 20.26, 85.13, 26.10 (DRHP p.510) |
| Net working capital days | 98.19, 81.17, 28.03 (DRHP p.510) |
| Other income as % of PBT | 129.9% in FY24, 36.2% in FY25, 6.4% in FY26 (our arithmetic, DRHP p.111) |
| Related-party share of revenue | sales to related parties ₹1,593.47 million, 23.1% of FY26 revenue (our arithmetic, DRHP p.115 to DRHP p.117) |
| Auditor emphases of matter | the previous auditor added emphasis of matter paragraphs for FY24 and FY25, on the merger and the withdrawn 2025 DRHP (DRHP p.91, DRHP p.92) |
The line that needs explaining is FY26 operating cash flow of ₹825.25 million, which came with a ₹1,182.47 million fall in inventory and a ₹740.20 million fall in trade payables, while other current and non-current assets rose ₹1,309.66 million (DRHP p.112). Other non-current assets rose from ₹113.49 million to ₹1,303.25 million (DRHP p.109). In FY24 other income of ₹107.01 million exceeded profit before tax of ₹82.39 million; FY25 other income included ₹158.49 million profit on sale of investment property (DRHP p.111, DRHP p.537).
07The balance sheet
| ₹ million | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-current borrowings | 522.51 | 273.72 | 3,128.96 |
| Current borrowings | 384.27 | 412.62 | 446.76 |
| Cash and equivalents | 5.85 | 2.61 | 269.47 |
| Capital work in progress | 10.88 | 531.63 | 2,215.67 |
| Total equity | 1,268.50 | 2,586.66 | 3,923.10 |
Source: DRHP p.109. Net debt to EBITDA was 2.58 and debt to equity 0.91 in FY26 (DRHP p.184).
All ₹3,575.72 million of borrowings at March 2026 carried variable rates; an IREDA term loan of ₹3,509.40 million was sanctioned, of which ₹1,437.30 million was drawn (DRHP p.92). Unsecured loans were ₹1,442.29 million, including ₹630.00 million from Nola Exim Private Limited and ₹300.00 million from Metarex Global Private Limited at 9%, and ₹162.01 million from Indresh Financial Services Private Limited at 25% (DRHP p.464). Nola Exim and Metarex are also top-ten customers (DRHP p.43).
Contingent liabilities were ₹889.69 million, mostly ₹782.30 million of corporate guarantees for bank loans of Devansh Infinium Private Limited (₹450.00 million) and Axat Impex LLP (₹332.30 million); capital commitments were ₹2,370.81 million (our arithmetic, DRHP p.114, DRHP p.395). The fresh issue is gross proceeds of ₹2,800.00 million; net proceeds are not yet stated, so a post-issue balance sheet cannot be drawn (DRHP p.155).
08What the money is for
| Object | ₹ million | % of fresh issue |
|---|---|---|
| Proposed melting shop, 50 tonne induction system | 2,100.00 | 75.0% |
| General corporate purposes | not yet stated | up to 25% |
Source: DRHP p.155, our arithmetic for the share. The melting shop costs ₹2,244.20 million in all, per a cost report by R. Singh & Associates Private Limited; ₹144.20 million comes from internal accruals, and the proceeds are to be spent ₹420.00 million in FY27 and ₹1,680.00 million in FY28 (DRHP p.156). It doubles billet capacity from 108,000 to 216,000 tonnes a year (DRHP p.158). The plan has not been appraised by a bank (DRHP p.156).
Into the business: up to ₹2,800.00 million (fresh issue). To the selling shareholder: up to 12,000,000 shares; the amount depends on a price not yet set (DRHP p.106).
09Who is selling
| Shareholder | Relationship | Shares before | Shares offered | % of holding offered |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ishu Bansal | Promoter | 235,354,800 | 12,000,000 | 5.1% |
Source: DRHP p.106, DRHP p.141, our arithmetic for the share. The offered shares are 4.0% of the pre-issue capital of 298,327,183 shares (our arithmetic, DRHP p.106). The seller's average cost is given as "Negligible", under ₹0.01 a share (DRHP p.149).
10Promoters
The promoters are Shivnarayan Bansal, Chairman and Managing Director; Ishu Bansal; and Devansh Infinium Private Limited, a steel trading company 99.99% owned by Shivnarayan Bansal (DRHP p.392, DRHP p.393). The document states that Shivnarayan Bansal is the spouse of Ishu Bansal, and names Madan Lal as the father of Ishu Bansal (DRHP p.398, DRHP p.399). The promoters are not the original promoters; control changed in the last five years (DRHP p.394).
Pay: Shivnarayan Bansal received director's remuneration of ₹1.00 million in FY25 and ₹2.40 million in FY26, and Ishu Bansal a salary of ₹1.20 million in FY26; neither was paid in FY24 (DRHP p.115). Together that is ₹3.60 million in FY26, about ₹0.4 crore (our arithmetic, DRHP p.115).
Promoter economics: Ishu Bansal received 25,859,433 shares in June 2023 and 26,802,320 in September 2024 as gifts from Madan Lal Bansal (DRHP p.143). In June 2024 Ishu Bansal transferred 2,780,000 shares to Sandeep Kothari and 1,112,000 to Dimple Kothari at ₹20, and 3,892,000 to Devansh Infinium Private Limited at ₹20.56 (DRHP p.143). After the split, Sandeep Kothari and Dimple Kothari gifted 13,900,000 and 5,560,000 shares back to Ishu Bansal on March 6, 2026 (DRHP p.143).
Devansh Infinium Private Limited bought 2,934,000 shares at ₹150 in December 2024 and further shares in late 2025 at ₹150 (pre-split) and ₹14.99 to ₹30 (post-split); its average cost is ₹17.46 (DRHP p.143, DRHP p.144, DRHP p.149).
Guarantees: the promoters guarantee the company's ₹3,509.40 million IREDA loan; the company has not yet created the pledge over promoter shares that IREDA required, paid ₹5.11 million in penalties up to July 31, 2026, and received an extension on August 12, 2026 (DRHP p.140, DRHP p.397). The summary litigation table shows one tax matter against the promoters involving ₹59.85 million, while the detailed chapter lists nil against the promoters (DRHP p.66, DRHP p.552).
11Who already owns it
| Holder before the issue | Shares | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Ishu Bansal (promoter) | 235,354,800 | 78.89% |
| Devansh Infinium Private Limited (promoter) | 39,146,950 | 13.12% |
| Sai Endeavours Private Limited (promoter group) | 4,980,000 | 1.67% |
| Bharat Vadilal Mehta jointly with Malti Bharat Mehta | 4,892,800 | 1.64% |
| Bansal Kapoorchand Kakaram | 3,697,400 | 1.24% |
| 48 other shareholders | 10,255,233 | 3.44% |
Source: DRHP p.141, DRHP p.146, our arithmetic for the last row. Promoters hold 92.01% and promoter group 1.67% (DRHP p.142). There are no venture capital or alternative investment fund shareholders (DRHP p.152).
Kirtan Maneklal Rupareliya, managing director of Neomile Capital Advisors Private Limited, one of the two lead managers, holds 2,780,000 shares, 0.93% (DRHP p.152). Sai Endeavours Private Limited bought its stake from Urja Ships Private Limited at ₹22 in March 2026 (DRHP p.145). The weighted average cost of all shares acquired in the last year is ₹22.39, in a range of nil to ₹90 (DRHP p.148).
12What changed just before the IPO
- Merger: Fidelis International Private Limited and Sai Infinium Private Limited were merged in by an NCLT order of August 7, 2024, effective March 30, 2024; the ship recycling and scrap businesses came with it (DRHP p.92, DRHP p.131).
- Public company: converted from a private company, fresh certificate dated October 15, 2024; renamed Sai Infinium Limited in November 2024 (DRHP p.3).
- Earlier DRHP withdrawn: a DRHP dated April 2, 2025 was withdrawn on June 3, 2025 (DRHP p.91).
- Split: ₹10 shares split into five ₹2 shares, approved by shareholders on November 29, 2025 (DRHP p.133).
- Private placements at ₹90: 1,517,660 shares on December 17, 2025, 2,911,223 on December 31, 2025, and 1,228,300 in March 2026, the last on March 23, 2026 (DRHP p.133 to DRHP p.135).
- Auditors: Parshva Shah & Co. and Deepak Goyal & Co. resigned in November 2025; Lahoti and Lahoti was appointed on November 24, 2025 and resigned on March 14, 2026; ANR & Associates was appointed on March 16, 2026 (DRHP p.122, DRHP p.123).
- Promoter disassociations: resignations from Metarex Global Private Limited and Falvi Infinium LLP on May 28, 2025 and from Sai Endeavours Private Limited on June 5, 2025 (DRHP p.396, DRHP p.397).
- New product: Rolling Mill 2 began structural steel production in February 2026, with ₹2,089.38 million capitalised in FY26 (DRHP p.157).
- Debt: borrowings rose from ₹686.34 million to ₹3,575.72 million in FY26; about ₹1,090.00 million of unsecured loans arrived in February and March 2026 (DRHP p.184, DRHP p.536).
13Capacity and expansion
| Facility | Installed capacity | FY26 utilisation | Planned addition | Commissioning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melting shop, MS billets | 108,000 TPA | 88.33% | 108,000 TPA | from issue proceeds, FY27 to FY28 |
| Rolling Mill 1, TMT bars | 108,000 TPA | 76.83% | - | - |
| Rolling Mill 2, structural | 108,000 TPA | 5.53% (two months) | - | February 2026 |
| Rolling Mill 3, structural | - | - | 108,000 TPA | by December 31, 2026 |
Source: DRHP p.47, DRHP p.157, DRHP p.158. Capacity is counted as 300 tonnes a day on one eight-hour shift for 360 days (DRHP p.296). ₹1,719.51 million had been spent on Rolling Mill 3 by March 2026 (DRHP p.157). A 26.4 MW wind-solar captive power plant is also under way (DRHP p.294).
14Market size and industry structure
As claimed: the CareEdge "Industry Research Report on Steel Industry" dated August 11, 2026, commissioned and paid for by the company, puts India's finished steel consumption at 164 million tonnes in FY26 and projects 206 million tonnes by FY29 (AP p.5, DRHP p.292).
The part that is addressable: long products (TMT bars and sections) sold mainly in Gujarat; the document gives no Gujarat or long-products figure in the pages read.
What the company is today: 101,019.62 tonnes of manufactured products sold in FY26, about 0.06% of national finished steel consumption (our arithmetic, DRHP p.296, DRHP p.297, AP p.5).
15Competitive position
What the document claims, and what it rests on:
- One site, three products: billets, bars and sections made at one owned plot of about 3.00 lakh square metres, about 120 km from Pipavav port (DRHP p.299, DRHP p.300).
- Brand and network: the "Bandhan" brand, 226 dealers and 5 distributors (DRHP p.293, DRHP p.294).
- Certification: BIS standards and ISO 9001, 14001 and 45001 (DRHP p.294).
Against that: 99.74% of revenue from one state, related-party customers, and third-party raw material supply (DRHP p.40, DRHP p.43, DRHP p.33).
16Peers the company named
Peers named in the offer document: VMS Industries Limited, Vraj Iron and Steel Limited, Rudra Global Infra Products Limited, VMS TMT Limited, Gallant Ispat Limited and MSP Steel Power Limited (DRHP p.183). Beekay Steel Industries Limited also appears in the FY25 and FY24 KPI tables (DRHP p.189).
| Company, FY26 | Revenue ₹ mn | PAT margin | P/E |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sai Infinium | 6,891.62 | 11.83% | - |
| Vraj Iron and Steel | 5,879.24 | 5.44% | 12.97 |
| Rudra Global Infra Products | 6,228.29 | 2.17% | 14.92 |
| VMS TMT | 8,385.57 | 2.51% | 9.54 |
| Gallant Ispat | 44,189.22 | 10.96% | 27.19 |
| MSP Steel Power | 28,429.64 | 1.19% | 59.12 |
Source: DRHP p.183, DRHP p.188. VMS Industries had revenue of ₹1,574.31 million and a P/E of 30.15 (DRHP p.183). The peer P/E average is 25.65 and the median 21.06 (DRHP p.182, our arithmetic from DRHP p.183). Gallant Ispat and MSP Steel Power are four to six times the company's revenue. No peer PAT margin is above the company's 11.83% (DRHP p.188).
17Risks, in plain words
- Customers: the top ten were 63.83% of FY26 revenue and the largest 18.59%; the FY25 largest, a promoter company, was 54.27% (DRHP p.42) → revenue rests on few buyers → five related or formerly related buyers were 48.99% of FY26 revenue (our arithmetic, DRHP p.43).
- Geography: Gujarat was 99.74% of FY26 revenue (DRHP p.40) → a local downturn has no offset elsewhere.
- Revenue mix: other operating income was 27.49% of FY26 revenue against 4.55% in FY25 (DRHP p.41) → the company itself says no revenue stream has shown a consistent trend (DRHP p.42).
- Cash flow: operating cash flow was negative in FY24 and FY25, at ₹(165.48) million and ₹(276.77) million (DRHP p.56).
- Debt and guarantees: all borrowings are at variable rates and the company guarantees ₹782.30 million of promoter entity loans (DRHP p.92, DRHP p.114).
- Land: a civil suit challenges the June 2024 sale deed for land at Survey No. 1027, part of the plant site (DRHP p.51, DRHP p.547).
- Suppliers: the ten largest were 63.98% of FY26 purchases (DRHP p.33).
18Litigation and regulatory matters
| Matter | Party | Amount ₹ mn | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Income tax AY 2024-25 | Company, appeal by it | 37.67 | pending before CIT(A) (DRHP p.551) |
| GST, two appeals | Company, appeals by it | 14.62 | pending (DRHP p.551) |
| Cheque dishonour, 6 complaints | Company, as complainant | 1.0 to 1.2 each | pending (DRHP p.548) |
| Civil suit over land deed | Against the company | not quantified | pending (DRHP p.547) |
| Labour and factory cases | Director Munishkumar A Bansal | not quantified | pending (DRHP p.552) |
| Tax matter | Promoters | 59.85 | per summary table (DRHP p.66) |
The NCLT merger order recorded an income tax observation that ₹844.10 million of FY2020-21 transactions of a merged company with M/s EP Tradelink were "unexplained"; the company says no reassessment has been started (DRHP p.548). The GST amount is our sum of ₹2.59 million and ₹12.03 million (DRHP p.551). There is also a GST summons under Section 70 with no amount (DRHP p.547).
20What the offer document does not say
- Who bought the non-ferrous scrap in FY26, and why value per tonne rose about twelve times, in the pages read.
- Why FY26 other non-current assets rose from ₹113.49 million to ₹1,303.25 million, in the pages read (DRHP p.109).
- Which reading of the promoter tax matter is right, given the summary table and the detailed chapter differ (DRHP p.66, DRHP p.552).
- The size, price or investors of the Pre-IPO Placement the document allows for (DRHP p.154).
- Market share in Gujarat or in long products.
- Net proceeds, price band, lot size and dates, which is normal at DRHP stage.
21Five questions for management
- Who bought the ₹1,519.78 million of non-ferrous scrap in FY26, and what metals made up the 721.46 tonnes?
- How much of FY26 EBITDA of ₹1,281.88 million came from scrap and raw material sales rather than steel products?
- On what terms do Metarex Global and Nola Exim both lend to the company and purchase from it?
- Why did four statutory audit firms serve between November 2025 and March 2026?
- What utilisation does Rolling Mill 2 need to cover its depreciation and interest?
2Sources and cited facts
This study was read from 2 documents the company filed. The 105 figures it cites are listed under the document each came from, with the page and the sentence as printed.
Show all 105 cited facts, with the page and the sentence as printedHide the cited facts
- 1At a glanceWho pays it: builders and fabricators through 222 dealers in Gujarat, 4 in Punjab and 5 distributors in Gujarat, Rajasthan and Punjab (DRHP p.293).p.293
“Who pays it: builders and fabricators through 222 dealers in Gujarat, 4 in Punjab and 5 distributors in Gujarat, Rajasthan and Punjab (DRHP p.293).”
- 2
“Gujarat was 99.74% of FY26 revenue (DRHP p.40).”
- 3At a glanceThe largest customer, Metarex Global Private Limited, was 18.59% of FY26 revenue and the promoter company Devansh Infinium Private Limited was 15.77% (DRHP p.43).p.43
“The largest customer, Metarex Global Private Limited, was 18.59% of FY26 revenue and the promoter company Devansh Infinium Private Limited was 15.77% (DRHP p.43).”
- 4At a glanceWhy it is raising money: ₹2,100.00 million (₹210.0 crore) of the ₹2,800.00 million (₹280.0 crore) fresh issue is for a 50 tonne induction melting system to double billet capacity, with the rest for general corporate purposes (DRHP p.155).p.155
“Why it is raising money: ₹2,100.00 million (₹210.0 crore) of the ₹2,800.00 million (₹280.0 crore) fresh issue is for a 50 tonne induction melting system to double billet capacity, with the rest for general corporate purposes (DRHP p.155).”
- 5
“The offer for sale proceeds go to Ishu Bansal, not the company (DRHP p.155).”
- 6At a glanceThe one thing to understand: the FY26 rise in revenue came from "other operating income", chiefly non-ferrous scrap sales of ₹1,519.78 million on 721.46 tonnes, against ₹65.12 million on 370.96 tonnes in FY25 (DRHP p.299).p.299
“The one thing to understand: the FY26 rise in revenue came from "other operating income", chiefly non-ferrous scrap sales of ₹1,519.78 million on 721.46 tonnes, against ₹65.12 million on 370.96 tonnes in FY25 (DRHP p.299).”
- 7
“It also buys billets in the open market to roll (DRHP p.300).”
- 8The business, in plain wordsIts ship recycling yard at Alang, with 30,000 LDT of annual capacity, broke no ships in FY24, FY25 or FY26; the last ship was bought in November 2023 by a company since merged in (DRHP p.298).p.298
“Its ship recycling yard at Alang, with 30,000 LDT of annual capacity, broke no ships in FY24, FY25 or FY26; the last ship was bought in November 2023 by a company since merged in (DRHP p.298).”
- 9The business, in plain wordsIn FY26 that was 85,093.17 tonnes × ₹44,981.64 = ₹3,827.63 million (DRHP p.296).p.296
“In FY26 that was 85,093.17 tonnes × ₹44,981.64 = ₹3,827.63 million (DRHP p.296).”
- 10Where the money comes fromShip recycling was 1.83% of FY25 revenue and real estate under 1% in each year (DRHP p.41).p.41
“Ship recycling was 1.83% of FY25 revenue and real estate under 1% in each year (DRHP p.41).”
- 11Where the money comes fromIn FY25 the largest customer was Devansh Infinium Private Limited, a promoter, at 54.27% (DRHP p.43).p.43
“In FY25 the largest customer was Devansh Infinium Private Limited, a promoter, at 54.27% (DRHP p.43).”
- 12Where the money comes fromIn FY26 the top ten included Devansh Infinium Private Limited (15.77%), Falvi Infinium LLP (6.75%), Sai Endeavours Private Limited (4.40%) and Axat Impex LLP (3.48%) (DRHP p.43).p.43
“In FY26 the top ten included Devansh Infinium Private Limited (15.77%), Falvi Infinium LLP (6.75%), Sai Endeavours Private Limited (4.40%) and Axat Impex LLP (3.48%) (DRHP p.43).”
- 13Where the money comes fromMetarex Global Private Limited, the largest FY26 customer, was formerly Devansh Endeavours Private Limited; Shivnarayan Bansal resigned as its director on May 28, 2025 (DRHP p.397).p.397
“Metarex Global Private Limited, the largest FY26 customer, was formerly Devansh Endeavours Private Limited; Shivnarayan Bansal resigned as its director on May 28, 2025 (DRHP p.397).”
- 14
“The ten largest suppliers were 63.98% of FY26 purchases (DRHP p.33).”
- 15The growth recordNet worth as the company defines it was ₹1,939.38 million, ₹3,257.54 million and ₹4,593.98 million; return on equity 4.84%, 16.91% and 21.00%; return on capital employed 8.47%, 20.88% and 16.73% (DRHP p.184).p.184
“Net worth as the company defines it was ₹1,939.38 million, ₹3,257.54 million and ₹4,593.98 million; return on equity 4.84%, 16.91% and 21.00%; return on capital employed 8.47%, 20.88% and 16.73% (DRHP p.184).”
- 16
“EBITDA margin moved from 5.9% to 18.6%, up 1,269 basis points (DRHP p.184).”
- 17What the growth is made ofFY24 to FY25: TMT bar volume rose from 57,944 to 86,651.76 tonnes while realisation fell from ₹49,598.06 to ₹46,829.40 a tonne, and billet sales fell from 29,860 to 7,558.19 tonnes (DRHP p.296).p.296
“FY24 to FY25: TMT bar volume rose from 57,944 to 86,651.76 tonnes while realisation fell from ₹49,598.06 to ₹46,829.40 a tonne, and billet sales fell from 29,860 to 7,558.19 tonnes (DRHP p.296).”
- 18
“Revenue rose 12.91% (DRHP p.184).”
- 19What the growth is made ofManufactured goods revenue rose only ₹206.37 million; other operating income rose ₹1,654.31 million (DRHP p.534).p.534
“Manufactured goods revenue rose only ₹206.37 million; other operating income rose ₹1,654.31 million (DRHP p.534).”
- 20What the growth is made ofThe document says the scrap includes aluminium, brass, moly and nickel, but does not explain the change in value per tonne or name the buyers of that scrap (DRHP p.298).p.298
“The document says the scrap includes aluminium, brass, moly and nickel, but does not explain the change in value per tonne or name the buyers of that scrap (DRHP p.298).”
- 21
“Receivable days | 34.11 in FY24, 30.16 in FY25, 12.32 in FY26 (DRHP p.510)”
- 22
“Inventory days | 84.34, 136.14, 41.81 (DRHP p.510)”
- 23
“Payable days | 20.26, 85.13, 26.10 (DRHP p.510)”
- 24
“Net working capital days | 98.19, 81.17, 28.03 (DRHP p.510)”
- 25Earnings qualityThe line that needs explaining is FY26 operating cash flow of ₹825.25 million, which came with a ₹1,182.47 million fall in inventory and a ₹740.20 million fall in trade payables, while other current and non-current assets rose ₹1,309.66 million (DRHP p.112).p.112
“The line that needs explaining is FY26 operating cash flow of ₹825.25 million, which came with a ₹1,182.47 million fall in inventory and a ₹740.20 million fall in trade payables, while other current and non-current assets rose ₹1,309.66 million (DRHP p.112).”
- 26Earnings qualityOther non-current assets rose from ₹113.49 million to ₹1,303.25 million (DRHP p.109).p.109
“Other non-current assets rose from ₹113.49 million to ₹1,303.25 million (DRHP p.109).”
- 27
“Net debt to EBITDA was 2.58 and debt to equity 0.91 in FY26 (DRHP p.184).”
- 28The balance sheetAll ₹3,575.72 million of borrowings at March 2026 carried variable rates; an IREDA term loan of ₹3,509.40 million was sanctioned, of which ₹1,437.30 million was drawn (DRHP p.92).p.92
“All ₹3,575.72 million of borrowings at March 2026 carried variable rates; an IREDA term loan of ₹3,509.40 million was sanctioned, of which ₹1,437.30 million was drawn (DRHP p.92).”
- 29The balance sheetUnsecured loans were ₹1,442.29 million, including ₹630.00 million from Nola Exim Private Limited and ₹300.00 million from Metarex Global Private Limited at 9%, and ₹162.01 million from Indresh Financial Services Private Limited at 25% (DRHP p.464).p.464
“Unsecured loans were ₹1,442.29 million, including ₹630.00 million from Nola Exim Private Limited and ₹300.00 million from Metarex Global Private Limited at 9%, and ₹162.01 million from Indresh Financial Services Private Limited at 25% (DRHP p.464).”
- 30
“Nola Exim and Metarex are also top-ten customers (DRHP p.43).”
- 31The balance sheetThe fresh issue is gross proceeds of ₹2,800.00 million; net proceeds are not yet stated, so a post-issue balance sheet cannot be drawn (DRHP p.155).p.155
“The fresh issue is gross proceeds of ₹2,800.00 million; net proceeds are not yet stated, so a post-issue balance sheet cannot be drawn (DRHP p.155).”
- 32What the money is forSingh & Associates Private Limited; ₹144.20 million comes from internal accruals, and the proceeds are to be spent ₹420.00 million in FY27 and ₹1,680.00 million in FY28 (DRHP p.156).p.156
“Singh & Associates Private Limited; ₹144.20 million comes from internal accruals, and the proceeds are to be spent ₹420.00 million in FY27 and ₹1,680.00 million in FY28 (DRHP p.156).”
- 33What the money is forIt doubles billet capacity from 108,000 to 216,000 tonnes a year (DRHP p.158).p.158
“It doubles billet capacity from 108,000 to 216,000 tonnes a year (DRHP p.158).”
- 34
“The plan has not been appraised by a bank (DRHP p.156).”
- 35What the money is for> To the selling shareholder: up to 12,000,000 shares; the amount depends on a price not yet set (DRHP p.106).p.106
“> To the selling shareholder: up to 12,000,000 shares; the amount depends on a price not yet set (DRHP p.106).”
- 36Who is sellingThe seller's average cost is given as "Negligible", under ₹0.01 a share (DRHP p.149).p.149
“The seller's average cost is given as "Negligible", under ₹0.01 a share (DRHP p.149).”
- 37PromotersThe promoters are not the original promoters; control changed in the last five years (DRHP p.394).p.394
“The promoters are not the original promoters; control changed in the last five years (DRHP p.394).”
- 38PromotersPay: Shivnarayan Bansal received director's remuneration of ₹1.00 million in FY25 and ₹2.40 million in FY26, and Ishu Bansal a salary of ₹1.20 million in FY26; neither was paid in FY24 (DRHP p.115).p.115
“Pay: Shivnarayan Bansal received director's remuneration of ₹1.00 million in FY25 and ₹2.40 million in FY26, and Ishu Bansal a salary of ₹1.20 million in FY26; neither was paid in FY24 (DRHP p.115).”
- 39PromotersPromoter economics: Ishu Bansal received 25,859,433 shares in June 2023 and 26,802,320 in September 2024 as gifts from Madan Lal Bansal (DRHP p.143).p.143
“Promoter economics: Ishu Bansal received 25,859,433 shares in June 2023 and 26,802,320 in September 2024 as gifts from Madan Lal Bansal (DRHP p.143).”
- 40PromotersIn June 2024 Ishu Bansal transferred 2,780,000 shares to Sandeep Kothari and 1,112,000 to Dimple Kothari at ₹20, and 3,892,000 to Devansh Infinium Private Limited at ₹20.56 (DRHP p.143).p.143
“In June 2024 Ishu Bansal transferred 2,780,000 shares to Sandeep Kothari and 1,112,000 to Dimple Kothari at ₹20, and 3,892,000 to Devansh Infinium Private Limited at ₹20.56 (DRHP p.143).”
- 41PromotersAfter the split, Sandeep Kothari and Dimple Kothari gifted 13,900,000 and 5,560,000 shares back to Ishu Bansal on March 6, 2026 (DRHP p.143).p.143
“After the split, Sandeep Kothari and Dimple Kothari gifted 13,900,000 and 5,560,000 shares back to Ishu Bansal on March 6, 2026 (DRHP p.143).”
- 42
“Promoters hold 92.01% and promoter group 1.67% (DRHP p.142).”
- 43Who already owns itThere are no venture capital or alternative investment fund shareholders (DRHP p.152).p.152
“There are no venture capital or alternative investment fund shareholders (DRHP p.152).”
- 44Who already owns itKirtan Maneklal Rupareliya, managing director of Neomile Capital Advisors Private Limited, one of the two lead managers, holds 2,780,000 shares, 0.93% (DRHP p.152).p.152
“Kirtan Maneklal Rupareliya, managing director of Neomile Capital Advisors Private Limited, one of the two lead managers, holds 2,780,000 shares, 0.93% (DRHP p.152).”
- 45Who already owns itSai Endeavours Private Limited bought its stake from Urja Ships Private Limited at ₹22 in March 2026 (DRHP p.145).p.145
“Sai Endeavours Private Limited bought its stake from Urja Ships Private Limited at ₹22 in March 2026 (DRHP p.145).”
- 46Who already owns itThe weighted average cost of all shares acquired in the last year is ₹22.39, in a range of nil to ₹90 (DRHP p.148).p.148
“The weighted average cost of all shares acquired in the last year is ₹22.39, in a range of nil to ₹90 (DRHP p.148).”
- 47What changed just before the IPOPublic company: converted from a private company, fresh certificate dated October 15, 2024; renamed Sai Infinium Limited in November 2024 (DRHP p.3).p.3
“Public company: converted from a private company, fresh certificate dated October 15, 2024; renamed Sai Infinium Limited in November 2024 (DRHP p.3).”
- 48What changed just before the IPOEarlier DRHP withdrawn: a DRHP dated April 2, 2025 was withdrawn on June 3, 2025 (DRHP p.91).p.91
“Earlier DRHP withdrawn: a DRHP dated April 2, 2025 was withdrawn on June 3, 2025 (DRHP p.91).”
- 49What changed just before the IPOSplit: ₹10 shares split into five ₹2 shares, approved by shareholders on November 29, 2025 (DRHP p.133).p.133
“Split: ₹10 shares split into five ₹2 shares, approved by shareholders on November 29, 2025 (DRHP p.133).”
- 50What changed just before the IPONew product: Rolling Mill 2 began structural steel production in February 2026, with ₹2,089.38 million capitalised in FY26 (DRHP p.157).p.157
“New product: Rolling Mill 2 began structural steel production in February 2026, with ₹2,089.38 million capitalised in FY26 (DRHP p.157).”
- 51Capacity and expansionCapacity is counted as 300 tonnes a day on one eight-hour shift for 360 days (DRHP p.296).p.296
“Capacity is counted as 300 tonnes a day on one eight-hour shift for 360 days (DRHP p.296).”
- 52Capacity and expansion₹1,719.51 million had been spent on Rolling Mill 3 by March 2026 (DRHP p.157).p.157
“₹1,719.51 million had been spent on Rolling Mill 3 by March 2026 (DRHP p.157).”
- 53
“A 26.4 MW wind-solar captive power plant is also under way (DRHP p.294).”
- 54
“Certification: BIS standards and ISO 9001, 14001 and 45001 (DRHP p.294).”
- 55Peers the company named> Peers named in the offer document: VMS Industries Limited, Vraj Iron and Steel Limited, Rudra Global Infra Products Limited, VMS TMT Limited, Gallant Ispat Limited and MSP Steel Power Limited (DRHP p.183).p.183
“> Peers named in the offer document: VMS Industries Limited, Vraj Iron and Steel Limited, Rudra Global Infra Products Limited, VMS TMT Limited, Gallant Ispat Limited and MSP Steel Power Limited (DRHP p.183).”
- 56Peers the company namedBeekay Steel Industries Limited also appears in the FY25 and FY24 KPI tables (DRHP p.189).p.189
“Beekay Steel Industries Limited also appears in the FY25 and FY24 KPI tables (DRHP p.189).”
- 57Peers the company namedVMS Industries had revenue of ₹1,574.31 million and a P/E of 30.15 (DRHP p.183).p.183
“VMS Industries had revenue of ₹1,574.31 million and a P/E of 30.15 (DRHP p.183).”
- 58
“No peer PAT margin is above the company's 11.83% (DRHP p.188).”
- 59Risks, in plain wordsCustomers: the top ten were 63.83% of FY26 revenue and the largest 18.59%; the FY25 largest, a promoter company, was 54.27% (DRHP p.42) → revenue rests on few buyers → five related or formerly related buyers were 48.99% of FY26 revenue (our arithmetic, DRHP p.43).p.42
“Customers: the top ten were 63.83% of FY26 revenue and the largest 18.59%; the FY25 largest, a promoter company, was 54.27% (DRHP p.42) → revenue rests on few buyers → five related or formerly related buyers were 48.99% of FY26 revenue (our arithmetic, DRHP p.43).”
- 60Risks, in plain wordsGeography: Gujarat was 99.74% of FY26 revenue (DRHP p.40) → a local downturn has no offset elsewhere.p.40
“Geography: Gujarat was 99.74% of FY26 revenue (DRHP p.40) → a local downturn has no offset elsewhere.”
- 61Risks, in plain wordsRevenue mix: other operating income was 27.49% of FY26 revenue against 4.55% in FY25 (DRHP p.41) → the company itself says no revenue stream has shown a consistent trend (DRHP p.42).p.41
“Revenue mix: other operating income was 27.49% of FY26 revenue against 4.55% in FY25 (DRHP p.41) → the company itself says no revenue stream has shown a consistent trend (DRHP p.42).”
- 62Risks, in plain wordsCash flow: operating cash flow was negative in FY24 and FY25, at ₹(165.48) million and ₹(276.77) million (DRHP p.56).p.56
“Cash flow: operating cash flow was negative in FY24 and FY25, at ₹(165.48) million and ₹(276.77) million (DRHP p.56).”
- 63
“Suppliers: the ten largest were 63.98% of FY26 purchases (DRHP p.33).”
- 64Litigation and regulatory mattersIncome tax AY 2024-25 | Company, appeal by it | 37.67 | pending before CIT(A) (DRHP p.551)p.551
“Income tax AY 2024-25 | Company, appeal by it | 37.67 | pending before CIT(A) (DRHP p.551)”
- 65Litigation and regulatory mattersGST, two appeals | Company, appeals by it | 14.62 | pending (DRHP p.551)p.551
“GST, two appeals | Company, appeals by it | 14.62 | pending (DRHP p.551)”
- 66Litigation and regulatory mattersCheque dishonour, 6 complaints | Company, as complainant | 1.0 to 1.2 each | pending (DRHP p.548)p.548
“Cheque dishonour, 6 complaints | Company, as complainant | 1.0 to 1.2 each | pending (DRHP p.548)”
- 67Litigation and regulatory mattersCivil suit over land deed | Against the company | not quantified | pending (DRHP p.547)p.547
“Civil suit over land deed | Against the company | not quantified | pending (DRHP p.547)”
- 68Litigation and regulatory mattersLabour and factory cases | Director Munishkumar A Bansal | not quantified | pending (DRHP p.552)p.552
“Labour and factory cases | Director Munishkumar A Bansal | not quantified | pending (DRHP p.552)”
- 69
“Tax matter | Promoters | 59.85 | per summary table (DRHP p.66)”
- 70Litigation and regulatory mattersThe NCLT merger order recorded an income tax observation that ₹844.10 million of FY2020-21 transactions of a merged company with M/s EP Tradelink were "unexplained"; the company says no reassessment has been started (DRHP p.548).p.548
“The NCLT merger order recorded an income tax observation that ₹844.10 million of FY2020-21 transactions of a merged company with M/s EP Tradelink were "unexplained"; the company says no reassessment has been started (DRHP p.548).”
- 71Litigation and regulatory mattersThe GST amount is our sum of ₹2.59 million and ₹12.03 million (DRHP p.551).p.551
“The GST amount is our sum of ₹2.59 million and ₹12.03 million (DRHP p.551).”
- 72Litigation and regulatory mattersThere is also a GST summons under Section 70 with no amount (DRHP p.547).p.547
“There is also a GST summons under Section 70 with no amount (DRHP p.547).”
- 73Related-party transactionsIt also bought fixed assets of ₹353.55 million from Devansh Infinium (DRHP p.115).p.115
“It also bought fixed assets of ₹353.55 million from Devansh Infinium (DRHP p.115).”
- 74Related-party transactionsFY25 sales to Devansh Infinium were ₹2,748.98 million, 52.00% of revenue (DRHP p.116).p.116
“FY25 sales to Devansh Infinium were ₹2,748.98 million, 52.00% of revenue (DRHP p.116).”
- 75Related-party transactionsLoans: Madan Lal Bansal lent ₹1,090.47 million in FY25 and ₹754.07 million in FY24; Shivnarayan Bansal lent ₹965.00 million and Ishu Bansal ₹471.07 million in FY25, all repaid (DRHP p.115).p.115
“Loans: Madan Lal Bansal lent ₹1,090.47 million in FY25 and ₹754.07 million in FY24; Shivnarayan Bansal lent ₹965.00 million and Ishu Bansal ₹471.07 million in FY25, all repaid (DRHP p.115).”
- 76Related-party transactionsIn March 2024 the company bought properties from Kusumlata Vijaykumar Bansal and Vijaykumar Kakaram Bansal for ₹60.00 million and ₹68.80 million (DRHP p.117).p.117
“In March 2024 the company bought properties from Kusumlata Vijaykumar Bansal and Vijaykumar Kakaram Bansal for ₹60.00 million and ₹68.80 million (DRHP p.117).”
- 77Related-party transactionsSeveral counterparties counted as related only for part of FY26: Metarex Global and Falvi Infinium from March 31 to May 28, 2025 (DRHP p.475).p.475
“Several counterparties counted as related only for part of FY26: Metarex Global and Falvi Infinium from March 31 to May 28, 2025 (DRHP p.475).”
- 78What the offer document does not sayWhy FY26 other non-current assets rose from ₹113.49 million to ₹1,303.25 million, in the pages read (DRHP p.109).p.109
“Why FY26 other non-current assets rose from ₹113.49 million to ₹1,303.25 million, in the pages read (DRHP p.109).”
- 79What the offer document does not sayThe size, price or investors of the Pre-IPO Placement the document allows for (DRHP p.154).p.154
“The size, price or investors of the Pre-IPO Placement the document allows for (DRHP p.154).”
- 80
“Growth | EBITDA margin FY24 → FY26 | 5.9% → 18.6% | (DRHP p.184)”
- 81
“Issue | Fresh issue | ₹280.0 cr | (DRHP p.155)”
- 82
“Issue | Offer for sale | 12,000,000 shares by one promoter | (DRHP p.106)”
- 83
“Issue | Promoter holding before the issue | 92.0% | (DRHP p.142)”
- 84
“Concentration | Largest customer | 18.6% of FY26 revenue | (DRHP p.42)”
- 85
“Concentration | Top ten customers | 63.8% of FY26 revenue | (DRHP p.42)”
- 86
“Concentration | Top ten suppliers | 64.0% of FY26 purchases | (DRHP p.33)”
- 87
“Concentration | Gujarat | 99.7% of FY26 revenue | (DRHP p.40)”
- 88
“Balance sheet | Net debt / EBITDA | 2.6× | (DRHP p.184)”
- 89
“Balance sheet | Debt to equity FY26 | 0.9× | (DRHP p.184)”
- 90
“Balance sheet | ROCE FY26 | 16.7% | (DRHP p.184)”
- 91
“Worth reading | Operating cash flow FY26 | ₹82.5 cr | (DRHP p.112)”
- 92
“Worth reading | Working-capital days FY26 | 28 | (DRHP p.510)”
- 93
“Worth reading | Other operating income FY26 | 27.5% of revenue | (DRHP p.41)”
- 94
“Before the IPO | Revenue FY24 → FY26 | ₹468.2 cr → ₹689.2 cr | (DRHP p.111)”
- 95
“Before the IPO | PAT FY24 → FY26 | ₹6.1 cr → ₹82.4 cr | (DRHP p.111)”
- 96
“Before the IPO | Receivable days FY24 → FY26 | 34 → 12 | (DRHP p.510)”
- 97
“Before the IPO | Share split | ₹10 to ₹2, November 2025 | (DRHP p.133)”
- 98Key figuresBefore the IPO | Last allotment before the IPO | ₹90 a share, March 2026 | (DRHP p.135)p.135
“Before the IPO | Last allotment before the IPO | ₹90 a share, March 2026 | (DRHP p.135)”
- 99
“to Lahoti and Lahoti, November 2025; to ANR & Associates, March 2026 | (DRHP p.122)”
- 100
“Before the IPO | Converted to a public company | October 2024 | (DRHP p.3)”
- 102
“Who is involved | Promoter | Shivnarayan Bansal | (DRHP p.392)”
- 103
“Who is involved | Promoter | Ishu Bansal | (DRHP p.392)”
- 104
“Who is involved | Promoter | Devansh Infinium Private Limited | (DRHP p.392)”
- 105Key figuresWho is involved | Selling shareholder | Ishu Bansal (promoter), 12,000,000 shares | (DRHP p.106)p.106
“Who is involved | Selling shareholder | Ishu Bansal (promoter), 12,000,000 shares | (DRHP p.106)”
- 101
“Who is involved | Industry | Metals and mining | (AP p.3)”
Sai Infinium IPO: before the IPO
The record up to the issue and what changed in the company's capital and auditors, from the offer document.
- Revenue FY24 → FY26
- ₹468.2 cr → ₹689.2 cr
- PAT FY24 → FY26
- ₹6.1 cr → ₹82.4 cr
- Receivable days FY24 → FY26
- 34 → 12
- Promoter remuneration FY24 → FY26
- none → ₹0.4 cr
- Share split
- ₹10 to ₹2, November 2025
- Last allotment before the IPO
- ₹90 a share, March 2026
- Auditor change
- Parshva Shah & Co. and Deepak Goyal & Co. to Lahoti and Lahoti, November 2025; to ANR & Associates, March 2026
- Converted to a public company
- October 2024
Sai Infinium IPO: checks
Factual conditions, each with a fixed threshold, read from the key figures. A condition met is a fact to read up on in the study, not a verdict on the issue; meeting none is not a verdict either.
- Profit grew much faster than revenue
Profit grew 266% a year against revenue's 21.3%.
Sai Infinium IPO: questions answered
When will the Sai Infinium IPO open?
No dates or price band yet. The company filed its draft offer document on 24 Sept 2026. The dates and the band come with the red herring prospectus, after SEBI has reviewed the draft.
What are Sai Infinium's financials?
Revenue went ₹468.2 cr to ₹689.2 cr (FY24 to FY26), 21.3% a year. Profit after tax went ₹6.1 cr to ₹82.4 cr (FY24 to FY26), 266.3% a year. All figures are from the offer document's restated statements.
How much of Sai Infinium's revenue comes from its largest customer?
The largest customer brought 18.6% of FY26 revenue, and the top ten customers 63.8%, as the offer document gives it. The study shows the years before and whether the customers are named.
Is the Sai Infinium IPO a fresh issue or an offer for sale?
A fresh issue of ₹280 crore, which goes to the company, and an offer for sale of 12,000,000 shares by one promoter, which goes to the shareholders selling.
What is the Sai Infinium IPO GMP?
newboard does not publish a grey-market premium. Grey-market deals happen outside the stock exchanges, are not regulated, and leave no public record of who traded at what price. What is on record is the offer document, read on this page, and the exchanges' bid book.
Sai Infinium IPO: the next step, on Telegram
A message when there is news on its price band, bidding, allotment status, listing day and use-of-proceeds reports. Free, no account, leave in one tap. Send /stop to end it.
Not on this page yet: the peer table the issuer printed. Each is added when the pipeline extracts it from the offer document.