Vivekanand Cotspin Limited IPO
Textiles and apparel · DRHP 5 Jun 2026
Follow this IPOband, bidding, allotment and listing, on Telegram
- Price band
- ₹35.00 to ₹37.00
- Subscription window
- 21 Sept to 23 Sept
- 2026
- Subscribed
- 1.7x
- DRHP filed
- 5 Jun 2026
A cotton ginner and spinner with one plant at Kadi, Gujarat, is issuing up to 60,00,000 new shares on BSE SME, with the price left blank in the prospectus, to fund working capital and spinning machinery; no shareholder is selling. Revenue rose from ₹357.4 crore in FY24 to ₹408.0 crore in FY26, and profit from ₹3.4 crore to ₹3.7 crore.
Vivekanand Cotspin SME IPO: key figures
From the offer document; each figure is cited in the study below. Placings are among the 78 SME issues newboard has studied
Growth
- Revenue CAGR FY24 to FY26
- 6.8%higher than 11% of studied issues
- PAT CAGR FY24 to FY26
- 4.9%higher than 10% of studied issues
- EBITDA margin FY24 → FY26
- 4.1% → 3.7%higher than 3% of studied issues
- PAT margin FY26
- 0.9%
Issue
- Fresh issue
- 60,00,000 shares, price not stated
- Offer for sale
- none
- Promoter holding before → after
- 100.0% → 73.0%
- Shares after the issue
- 2,22,50,000
Concentration
- Largest customer
- 12.0% of FY26 product saleshigher than 30% of studied issues
- Top ten customers
- 51.2% of FY26 product saleshigher than 36% of studied issues
- Largest supplier
- 21.3% of FY26 purchases
- Sales to group entities FY24 → FY26
- 66.1% → 6.5% of revenue
Balance sheet
- Total borrowings March 2026
- ₹45.0 cr
- Net debt / EBITDA FY26
- 3.0×
- Debt to equity FY26
- 1.6×
- ROCE FY26
- 13.1%higher than 3% of studied issues
Worth reading
- Export incentives and subsidy FY26
- ₹4.0 cr, 78.6% of PBT
- Related-party sales FY26
- ₹26.5 cr
- Contingent liabilities
- ₹0.5 cr
- Working-capital cycle FY26
- 29 dayshigher than 19% of studied issues
- Operating cash flow FY26
- ₹8.7 cr
- Other income, share of profit before tax FY26
- 25.6%
Share an interesting fact, not just a link
Pick one. The post writes itself, with the page the figure is on and the picture to go with it.
On this page (25 sections)
- Key figures
- The study
- At a glance
- The business, in plain words
- Where the money comes from
- The growth record
- What the growth is made of
- Earnings quality
- The balance sheet
- What the money is for
- Who is selling
- Promoters
- Who already owns it
- What changed just before the IPO
- Capacity and expansion
- Market size and industry structure
- Competitive position
- Peers the company named
- Risks, in plain words
- Litigation and regulatory matters
- Related-party transactions
- What the offer document does not say
- Five questions for management
- Before the IPO
- Questions answered
Vivekanand Cotspin Limited: what the offer document says
Published 1 Oct 2026 · 6,451 words · read from the DRHP
01At a glance
What the company does: gins raw cotton (kapas) into cotton bales and cotton seed, spins bales into cotton yarn at one plant at Rangpurda, Kadi, in Mahesana district, Gujarat, and also trades cotton bales and yarn (RHP p.160).
Who pays it: local fabric producers, corporate buyers and overseas customers (RHP p.177), whom the prospectus does not name because they have not consented (RHP p.45). Two group entities, Ambica Cotseeds Limited and Vivekanand Industries, took 38.46% and 27.62% of FY24 revenue, and 3.21% and 3.28% of FY26 revenue (RHP p.25).
Why it is raising money: ₹1,100.00 lakh for working capital and ₹526.89 lakh for new spinning machinery, with a balance not yet stated for general corporate purposes (RHP p.100).
How fast it has grown: revenue from ₹35,738.81 lakh in FY24 to ₹40,801.01 lakh in FY26, and profit after tax from ₹335.33 lakh to ₹368.78 lakh (RHP p.115); by our arithmetic that is about 6.8% and 4.9% a year.
The one thing to understand: profit is small against revenue. FY26 profit after tax was 0.90% of revenue (RHP p.115), and export incentives and a yarn VAT subsidy of ₹403.31 lakh (RHP p.244) came to about 79% of FY26 profit before tax of ₹512.87 lakh by our arithmetic (RHP p.66).
02The business, in plain words
The business began as Vivekanand Cotspin LLP in July 2015, became a private company on August 5, 2024 and a public company on December 16, 2024 (RHP p.2). It runs a ginning unit and a spinning unit of 25,536 spindles at Kadi (RHP p.28). Ginning separates cotton fibre from seed and presses the fibre into bales; spinning turns bales into yarn for weaving and knitting (RHP p.160). Kapas is procured from farmers and agricultural markets (mandis) in Gujarat (RHP p.179).
A textile mill, trader or exporter needs fibre or yarn → it orders cotton bales, yarn, cotton seed or yarn waste → the company gins kapas into bales and seed, spins bales into carded or combed yarn, and resells bales and yarn it has purchased → it is paid per kilogram at market prices, on credit of 6 to 12 days.
The company also trades: in FY26 its purchases of traded goods were ₹13,341.37 lakh against revenue of ₹40,801.01 lakh (RHP p.66). Customers are given credit of 6 to 12 days (RHP p.51), and bales and yarn are sold mostly through brokers (RHP p.180). Part of the cotton seed from ginning is sold to Vivekanand Industries, which processes it into oil and cake, and Ambica Cotseeds Limited has exported the company's yarn and bales (RHP p.26). The company had 146 employees on payroll at May 30, 2026, 131 of them in production (RHP p.180), and runs a 4 MW ground-mounted solar plant for its own power (RHP p.177).
Earnings equation: Revenue = tonnes of bales, yarn, seed and waste sold × price per kilogram, and Profit ≈ revenue − cotton and traded goods − power, labour and upkeep − interest − depreciation + export incentives and subsidy. In FY26 cotton, traded goods and the change in stock took ₹37,739.90 lakh, 92.5% of revenue by our arithmetic (RHP p.66). Power and fuel cost ₹580.72 lakh (RHP p.246), and finance cost ₹556.81 lakh (RHP p.66). The prospectus gives no tonnes sold and no prices, so the equation cannot be filled in with volumes.
03Where the money comes from
| Product sales, ₹ lakh | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | FY26 share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cotton yarn | 9,742.95 | 12,597.04 | 21,080.23 | 52.18% |
| Cotton bales | 21,041.68 | 18,865.73 | 15,650.16 | 38.74% |
| Cotton seed | 3,375.51 | 3,952.90 | 2,709.63 | 6.71% |
| Yarn waste | 1,117.61 | 938.51 | 930.30 | 2.30% |
| Others, including job work | 110.16 | 13.29 | 27.38 | 0.07% |
| Total | 35,387.91 | 36,367.47 | 40,397.70 | 100.00% |
Source: RHP p.38. FY25 adds the LLP's period to August 4, 2024 and the company's period from August 5, 2024, by our arithmetic; the total matches the FY25 product sales the prospectus uses for its customer table (RHP p.177). Export incentives and a yarn VAT subsidy come on top as other operating revenue: ₹350.89 lakh in FY24 and ₹403.31 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.244).
Gujarat took 89.40% of FY24 product sales and 81.21% of FY26 product sales (RHP p.172). Exports were ₹3,191.14 lakh, 9.02%, in FY24 and ₹4,137.00 lakh, 10.24%, in FY26, of which China was ₹2,572.58 lakh after no sales there in the earlier years (RHP p.34).
| Share of product sales | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Largest customer | 38.84% | 29.31% | 12.02% |
| Top five customers | 78.88% | 71.95% | 34.86% |
| Top ten customers | 88.73% | 83.08% | 51.18% |
| Largest supplier, share of purchases | 39.47% | 40.95% | 21.30% |
Source: RHP p.45, RHP p.48.
Read from the filing: the largest customer's FY24 figure of ₹13,743.42 lakh (RHP p.45) equals the prospectus's FY24 sales to Ambica Cotseeds Limited, and the second customer's ₹9,870.98 lakh equals FY24 sales to Vivekanand Industries (RHP p.25). In FY26 the two group entities' sales of ₹1,339.17 lakh and ₹1,310.63 lakh match the seventh and eighth customers in the top-ten list (RHP p.177). Revenue depended on a few customers in FY24, most of it on the two group entities; in FY26 the top ten took about half of product sales and the largest 12.02%.
04The growth record
| ₹ lakh, restated | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from operations | 35,738.81 | 36,593.38 | 40,801.01 |
| EBITDA | 1,459.46 | 1,458.92 | 1,509.31 |
| EBITDA margin | 4.08% | 3.99% | 3.70% |
| Profit after tax | 335.33 | 494.29 | 368.78 |
| PAT margin | 0.94% | 1.35% | 0.90% |
| Operating cash flow | 2,440.04 | (371.96) | 866.64 |
| Net worth | 2,062.49 | 1,726.46 | 2,893.57 |
| Borrowings | 4,001.57 | 5,475.91 | 4,499.52 |
| Return on equity | 11.72% | 26.09% | 15.96% |
| Return on capital employed | 13.41% | 12.16% | 13.14% |
Source: RHP p.115, RHP p.117, RHP p.264. Brackets are an outflow.
FY24 is the LLP's year. FY25 is the prospectus's own sum of two periods, the LLP from April 1 to August 4, 2024 and the company from August 5, 2024 to March 31, 2025 (RHP p.268). FY25 profit includes a deferred tax credit of ₹155.31 lakh (RHP p.66), which the prospectus attributes to the fall in tax rate from 34.94% for the LLP to 25.17% for the company (RHP p.267). Profit before tax, which that credit does not touch, was ₹524.24 lakh in FY24 and ₹512.87 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.66), and ₹457.74 lakh in FY25 (RHP p.267).
Our arithmetic: revenue grew about 6.8% a year from FY24 to FY26, EBITDA about 1.7% and profit after tax about 4.9%; the EBITDA margin fell about 38 basis points and the PAT margin about 3 basis points (RHP p.115). Other income of ₹131.14 lakh was 25.6% of the ₹512.87 lakh profit before tax in FY26 (our arithmetic, RHP p.66). Trade receivable days were 6 in FY24, 9 in FY25 and 12 in FY26 (RHP p.109).
05What the growth is made of
Revenue from operations rose from ₹35,738.81 lakh in FY24 to ₹40,801.01 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.115), an increase of ₹5,062.20 lakh by our arithmetic. Yarn sales rose from ₹9,742.95 lakh to ₹21,080.23 lakh while bale sales fell from ₹21,041.68 lakh to ₹15,650.16 lakh (RHP p.38). Over the same years the company's own yarn output fell from 3,703 tonnes to 3,051 tonnes (RHP p.29), and purchases of traded goods were ₹12,754.25 lakh in FY24 and ₹13,341.37 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.66).
The prospectus does not say how much of the yarn sold was spun at Kadi and how much was traded, and it labels all product sales as manufacturing (RHP p.172). It gives no tonnes sold and no prices. So the increase cannot be separated into volume, price and traded goods; that is the finding. The MD&A attributes FY26 growth mainly to exports (RHP p.266), which rose from ₹768.30 lakh in the period to March 2025 to ₹4,137.00 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.34).
The customer mix changed more than the total. Sales to the two group entities fell from ₹23,614.40 lakh in FY24 to ₹2,649.80 lakh in FY26 by our arithmetic (RHP p.25), so revenue from all other customers rose from about ₹12,124.41 lakh to about ₹38,151.21 lakh.
06Earnings quality
| Indicator | What the document shows |
|---|---|
| Operating cash flow against profit | ₹2,934.72 lakh against ₹1,198.40 lakh over FY24 to FY26, 2.4 times by our arithmetic; FY25 was an outflow of ₹371.96 lakh (RHP p.117) |
| Receivable days | 6, 9 and 12 in FY24, FY25 and FY26 (RHP p.107) |
| Inventory days | 23, 29 and 20 (RHP p.107) |
| Payable days | 10, 14 and 4 (RHP p.107) |
| Net working capital as % of revenue | 3.8% in FY24 and 8.7% in FY26 by our arithmetic (RHP p.41) |
| Other income | ₹131.14 lakh in FY26, of which ₹99.83 lakh was foreign exchange gain (RHP p.245) |
| Export incentives and subsidy | ₹403.31 lakh in FY26: duty drawback ₹80.42 lakh, RoDTEP ₹120.63 lakh, yarn VAT subsidy ₹202.26 lakh (RHP p.244) |
| Related-party share of revenue | 66.08% in FY24 and 6.49% in FY26 by our arithmetic (RHP p.25) |
| Exceptional items | loss of ₹15.91 lakh on destroyed plant, net of insurance, in the period to March 2025 (RHP p.246) |
| Restatement | period to March 2025: audited profit ₹225.88 lakh, restated ₹407.38 lakh (RHP p.248) |
| Auditor qualifications | none requiring adjustment (RHP p.227) |
The item that needs explaining is what sits under profit. In FY26 export incentives and the yarn VAT subsidy (₹403.31 lakh) and other income (₹131.14 lakh) together came to ₹534.45 lakh by our arithmetic, more than profit before tax of ₹512.87 lakh (RHP p.66). A yarn VAT subsidy receivable of ₹145.03 lakh was outstanding at March 2026 (RHP p.243).
The restatement raised profit for the period to March 2025 by ₹181.50 lakh, mostly a deferred tax adjustment of ₹160.51 lakh (RHP p.248), while ₹180.92 lakh of prior-year tax was charged straight to reserves rather than to profit (RHP p.237). The restated statements are signed by a peer-review auditor, S V J K and Associates, not by the statutory auditor, Mistry & Shah LLP (RHP p.39). The FY24 cash inflow came with a ₹1,378.90 lakh rise in payables, and the FY25 outflow with a ₹1,481.91 lakh rise in receivables in the period to March 2025 (RHP p.67).
07The balance sheet
At March 31, 2026 borrowings were ₹4,499.52 lakh against net worth of ₹2,893.57 lakh, a debt to equity ratio of 1.56 (RHP p.258). They were made up of Bank of Baroda term loans of ₹1,087.23 lakh at 8.15% and 9.25% (RHP p.237), cash credit of ₹2,750.58 lakh (RHP p.239) and unsecured loans from five promoters of ₹661.71 lakh (RHP p.238). Cash was ₹29.75 lakh (RHP p.65).
By April 30, 2026 borrowings were ₹5,842.87 lakh, including cash credit of ₹4,135.08 lakh (RHP p.259), and 82.09% of borrowings were payable on demand (RHP p.261). The company has no lease liabilities on its balance sheet; its plant land and buildings are leased from Avadh Cotton Industries and from promoters at ₹2.40 lakh a year for each lease (RHP p.182). Contingent liabilities were ₹54.37 lakh, a disputed GST demand (RHP p.247). An export obligation of ₹590.47 lakh FOB is open under an advance authorisation, with a duty liability of ₹303.97 lakh if it is not met (RHP p.49). The pages read state no capital commitments.
Guarantees: Nirav Bharatbhai Patel, Jasmin Vishnubhai Patel, Bharatbhai Prahaladbhai Patel, Vishnubhai Prahaladdas Patel and Gautam Bharatkumar Patel have given personal guarantees, and the term loans are also secured by mortgages of land owned by Ranjanben Bharatbhai Patel and Kapilaben Vishnubhai Patel, by Avadh Cotton Industries, and by Bharatbhai Prahaladbhai Patel and Vishnubhai Prahaladdas Patel (RHP p.260).
After the issue: the issue amount is blank, so the balance sheet after the fresh issue cannot be worked out, and the capitalisation statement leaves the post-issue column blank too (RHP p.258). None of the proceeds is earmarked for repaying debt (RHP p.100).
08What the money is for
| Object | ₹ lakh | Scheduled |
|---|---|---|
| Spinning machinery: comber, compact spinning, automatic cone winding | 526.89 | FY27 |
| Working capital | 1,100.00 | 500.00 in FY27, 600.00 in FY28 |
| General corporate purposes | not stated | - |
| Issue expenses | not stated | - |
Source: RHP p.100, RHP p.110. The share of each object in the fresh issue cannot be worked out because the issue amount is blank.
Machinery: three comber machines at ₹148.89 lakh, six compact spinning systems at ₹176.20 lakh and one automatic cone winder of 44 drums at ₹199.22 lakh including customs duty, from quotations dated June 30 and August 12, 2026 (RHP p.103). The quotations add up to ₹524.31 lakh (RHP p.103), ₹2.58 lakh less than the ₹526.89 lakh in the objects table; the prospectus does not explain the difference.
No orders have been placed, and the cone winder quotation was valid up to September 15, 2026 (RHP p.103). Orders are to be placed in September 2026, with commercial production from January 2027 (RHP p.106). The machinery adds no capacity; it is to make combed and compact yarn (RHP p.105).
Working capital: the company puts its FY28 working capital need at ₹6,974.87 lakh, of which ₹1,100.00 lakh is to come from the issue (RHP p.100). General corporate purposes: at most 15% of gross proceeds or ₹1,000 lakh, whichever is lower (RHP p.100). No monitoring agency is required because the issue is below ₹5,000 lakh (RHP p.111).
The issue: up to 60,00,000 new shares of ₹10 face value, 26.97% of the capital after the issue (RHP p.2). Of these, 3,00,000 are reserved for the market maker; of the net issue of 57,00,000 shares, not more than 28,50,000 go to qualified institutions (up to 17,10,000 to anchors), not less than 8,55,000 to non-institutional bidders and not less than 19,95,000 to individual investors (RHP p.63).
The prospectus gives an anchor bid date of September 18, 2026, bidding from September 21 to 23, 2026 and trading on or about September 28, 2026 (RHP p.307). The floor price, cap price and bid lot are blank (RHP p.305), and individual investors must apply for at least two lots, above ₹2 lakh (RHP p.306).
Swastika Investmart Limited is the book running lead manager (RHP p.1), and Sunflower Broking Private Limited the market maker (RHP p.84).
Into the business the whole issue: up to 60,00,000 new shares, at a price the prospectus leaves blank (RHP p.1). To selling shareholders nothing: there is no offer for sale (RHP p.1).
09Who is selling
No one. The whole issue is new shares and the offer for sale is nil (RHP p.1). The promoters and promoter group will not bid in the issue (RHP p.99).
10Promoters
The prospectus names nine promoters: Nirav Bharatbhai Patel, Jasmin Vishnubhai Patel, Bharatbhai Prahaladbhai Patel, Vishnubhai Prahaladdas Patel, Gautam Bharatkumar Patel, B P Patel Family Trust, V P Patel Family Trust, Ranjanben Bharatbhai Patel and Kapilaben Vishnubhai Patel (RHP p.1). It states that Bharatbhai Prahaladbhai Patel and Vishnubhai Prahaladdas Patel are brothers, that Nirav Bharatbhai Patel is a son of Bharatbhai Prahaladbhai Patel and that Jasmin Vishnubhai Patel is a son of Vishnubhai Prahaladdas Patel (RHP p.199). It lists Gautam Bharatkumar Patel as a son of Bharatbhai Prahaladbhai Patel and Ranjanben Bharatbhai Patel, and Kapilaben Vishnubhai Patel as the spouse of Vishnubhai Prahaladdas Patel (RHP p.219).
Nirav Bharatbhai Patel has been Chairman and Managing Director since January 17, 2025 and has 15 years in cotton ginning and spinning; Jasmin Vishnubhai Patel is Whole Time Director with 6 years (RHP p.197). Bharatbhai Prahaladbhai Patel and Vishnubhai Prahaladdas Patel are non-executive directors with 15 years each (RHP p.198). Gautam Bharatkumar Patel is not a director and has 9 years in textiles (RHP p.213). The prospectus says Ranjanben Bharatbhai Patel and Kapilaben Vishnubhai Patel have limited experience in this business (RHP p.40). The two family trusts were created on December 17, 2024 (RHP p.214).
What else they run: Ambica Cotseeds Limited (trading and export of bales and yarn), Ambica Cotseeds Pte. Ltd. in Singapore (merchant trading), Vivekanand Industries (ginning and cotton-seed oil) and Avadh Cotton Industries (ginning) are in the same trade, and Truepay Finance Private Limited is a finance company (RHP p.30). The company signed non-compete agreements with the first four on March 24 and April 10, 2026 (RHP p.195).
What the company pays them: salaries of up to ₹30 lakh a year each are approved for the Managing Director and the Whole Time Director (RHP p.201), and none was paid for 2025-26 (RHP p.202). The company paid ₹167.85 lakh of interest on promoter loans in FY26 by our arithmetic (RHP p.71). No promoter shares are pledged (RHP p.93).
Litigation and regulatory matters: Nirav Bharatbhai Patel faces income tax reassessment for assessment years 2019-20 to 2021-22, in which the assessing officer alleges that income of ₹7,13,46,338, ₹13,29,63,889 and ₹5,85,14,669 escaped assessment after Dena Bank flagged high-value transactions; responses have been filed and the matters are pending (RHP p.275). The amounts are income, and the prospectus does not state the tax at stake.
Nirav Bharatbhai Patel was also a director of Sun Ambica Energy Private Limited, which never started business and was struck off at its own request in February 2024 (RHP p.33). Some promoter group members are foreign nationals without PAN, and some Indian members have not filed income tax returns (RHP p.45).
Promoter economics:
- August 5, 2024: on conversion, the five partners were allotted 30,00,000 shares each at ₹10 against ₹1,500 lakh of fixed capital in the LLP, with no further cash (RHP p.236); the rest of the partners' balances became unsecured loans to the company (RHP p.261).
- September 30, 2024: Ranjanben Bharatbhai Patel acquired 100 shares at ₹10.95 (RHP p.94).
- February 6, 2025: 100 shares each were gifted to the two family trusts (RHP p.94).
- March 25, 2026: a rights issue of 12,50,000 shares at ₹64, one for every twelve held, raised ₹800 lakh (RHP p.88).
- Average cost per share: ₹14.15 for the five individual promoters, ₹4.74 for each trust and ₹14.88 for Ranjanben Bharatbhai Patel (RHP p.51).
11Who already owns it
| Holder | Shares before | % before | % after, if fully allotted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nirav Bharatbhai Patel | 32,50,000 | 20.00% | 14.61% |
| Jasmin Vishnubhai Patel | 32,50,000 | 20.00% | 14.61% |
| Gautam Bharatkumar Patel | 32,50,000 | 20.00% | 14.61% |
| Bharatbhai Prahaladbhai Patel | 32,49,784 | 20.00% | 14.61% |
| Vishnubhai Prahaladdas Patel | 32,49,784 | 20.00% | 14.61% |
| Two trusts, Ranjanben Bharatbhai Patel, Preet Vishnubhai Patel | 432 | negligible | negligible |
| Public, through this issue | - | - | 26.97% |
Source: RHP p.91, RHP p.2; the after-issue column is our arithmetic on 2,22,50,000 shares.
The company has nine shareholders (RHP p.99). The promoters hold 1,62,49,892 of the 1,62,50,000 shares and Preet Vishnubhai Patel, of the promoter group, holds 108 (RHP p.93). Kapilaben Vishnubhai Patel holds no shares (RHP p.214). There is no private equity, venture capital or institutional holder, and no pre-IPO placement (RHP p.1). If the whole issue is allotted, the promoters and promoter group would hold 73.03% of 2,22,50,000 shares by our arithmetic (RHP p.63). Of the promoters' shares, 48,95,000, which is 22.00% of the capital after the issue, are locked in for three years (RHP p.96).
12What changed just before the IPO
- The LLP became a private company on August 5, 2024 and a public company on December 16, 2024 (RHP p.2).
- On conversion, ₹1,500 lakh of partners' capital became share capital and the rest unsecured loans; promoter loans went from ₹31.07 lakh at August 4, 2024 to ₹1,861.71 lakh at March 31, 2025 and ₹661.71 lakh at March 31, 2026 (RHP p.261).
- The LLP's auditor, B. Shah & Associates, audited it up to FY24; Mistry and Shah LLP became the company's first auditor on August 6, 2024 (RHP p.84).
- The Managing Director, Whole Time Director and CFO were appointed on January 17, 2025 (RHP p.210); two independent directors left on December 9, 2025, their two replacements left on April 9, 2026, and the present two joined on April 16, 2026 (RHP p.204). The company secretary changed on June 29, 2026 (RHP p.210).
- The plant land and buildings were leased from Avadh Cotton Industries and from promoters under leases of November 2024 running ten years from August 5, 2024 (RHP p.182).
- A solar plant began supplying power in May 2024 (RHP p.268); power and fuel cost fell from ₹1,178.69 lakh in FY24 to ₹580.72 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.246).
- Purchases from related parties were 28.36% of purchases in FY24 and nil in FY26 (RHP p.49), and sales to group entities fell as set out in section 02.
- Exports to China of ₹2,572.58 lakh appeared in FY26 (RHP p.34).
- The family trusts were created on December 17, 2024 (RHP p.214), non-compete agreements were signed in March and April 2026 (RHP p.195), and a ₹800 lakh rights issue at ₹64 was made on March 25, 2026 (RHP p.88).
- Restatement raised profit for the period to March 2025 from ₹225.88 lakh to ₹407.38 lakh (RHP p.248).
- The company records errors in two forms filed with the Registrar of Companies in 2025 (RHP p.32), and provident fund deposits in FY24 that were up to 106 days late (RHP p.37).
13Capacity and expansion
| Product | Installed, tonnes a year | FY24 output | FY25 output | FY26 output |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cotton bales | 8,000 | 6,556 (81.94%) | 6,801 (85.01%) | 7,425 (92.82%) |
| Cotton yarn | 4,551 | 3,703 (81.38%) | 3,415 (75.05%) | 3,051 (67.05%) |
Source: RHP p.29, as certified by a chartered engineer. Figures in brackets are capacity use.
The prospectus attributes the fall in yarn capacity use to a shift towards value-added yarn and to cotton price swings, not to any plant constraint (RHP p.29). The issue-funded machinery does not change installed capacity (RHP p.105). The company's own estimate, not this study's, is that shifting 2,500 kg a day from carded to combed yarn at about ₹10 a kilogram more, and 4,000 kg a day from combed to compact yarn at about ₹5 more, would add about ₹164.25 lakh of revenue a year at optimal use (RHP p.104). The prospectus gives no utilisation for the ginning unit by season.
14Market size and industry structure
As claimed: the industry chapter draws on the "Industry Report on Cotton Yarn" by Dun & Bradstreet dated August 14, 2026, which the company commissioned and paid for (RHP p.18). The commissioned report puts India's cotton yarn production at 3,756.00 thousand tonnes in FY2025 and apparent domestic consumption at 2,612.5 thousand tonnes (RHP p.148). It puts cotton yarn exports at 1,182.81 thousand tonnes in FY2026 (RHP p.153), with Bangladesh taking 43% and China 17% of exports in 2024-25 (RHP p.154).
The part that is addressable: cotton bales, yarn and seed sold mainly in Gujarat and to a few export markets. The prospectus does not size that market.
What the company is today: 3,051 tonnes of yarn produced in FY26 (RHP p.29), about 0.08% of the national FY2025 production figure by our arithmetic, on figures for different years.
Structure, from the commissioned report: spinning capacity is concentrated among 20 to 25 major mills (RHP p.156), while the wider textile industry is fragmented, with the top 30 organised players at about 13 to 15% (RHP p.156). Raw cotton is more than half of the cost of making yarn (RHP p.156), cotton arrives mainly from November to March (RHP p.31), and synthetic fibres compete with cotton yarn (RHP p.49).
15Competitive position
| Company | Revenue FY26, ₹ lakh | EBITDA margin | PAT margin | RoCE | Debt to equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vivekanand Cotspin | 40,801.01 | 3.70% | 0.90% | 13.14% | 1.56 |
| Deepak Spinners | 53,416.0 | 3.76% | 0.68% | 1.15% | 0.13 |
| Lagnam Spintex | 60,498.05 | 11.05% | 2.38% | 9.40% | 2.64 |
Source: RHP p.118, FY26 figures.
Where they overlap: Lagnam Spintex makes ring-spun and open-end cotton yarn with about 67,000 spindles (RHP p.156), and Deepak Spinners makes synthetic and blended yarns with 90,864 spindles (RHP p.157); neither is described as ginning cotton. The prospectus puts the working capital cycle of Lagnam Spintex at 129 days and of Deepak Spinners at 54 days in FY26 (RHP p.108), against 29 days for the company (RHP p.107).
Why customers choose this company, as the prospectus puts it: quality, price and timely delivery (RHP p.181), with ginning and spinning at one site (RHP p.172). It holds organic and recycled-content scope certificates valid to January 7, 2027, and its national organic certificate expired on April 17, 2026 with renewal pending (RHP p.289). Its logo trademark application stands objected (RHP p.182). The prospectus names competition from large integrated textile companies, regional manufacturers and overseas firms (RHP p.34).
16Peers the company named
Peers named in the offer document: Deepak Spinners Limited and Lagnam Spintex Limited (RHP p.114).
| Company | Revenue FY26, ₹ lakh | RoNW | NAV per share, ₹ | P/E |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vivekanand Cotspin | 40,801.01 | 15.96% | 17.81 | - |
| Deepak Spinners | 53,416.00 | 1.60% | 319.10 | 22.11 |
| Lagnam Spintex | 60,498.05 | 11.23% | 76.60 | 9.52 |
Source: RHP p.114. Peer P/E is on BSE closing prices of May 29, 2026 and FY26 diluted EPS (RHP p.114).
The prospectus gives an industry P/E range of 9.52 to 22.11 with an average of 15.81 (RHP p.113). The company's FY26 EPS was ₹2.45 and its three-year weighted EPS ₹2.70 (RHP p.113). Deepak Spinners' revenue is about 1.3 times the company's and Lagnam Spintex's about 1.5 times, by our arithmetic (RHP p.114). Deepak Spinners is in a different segment, synthetic yarn (RHP p.157). The prospectus leaves the issue price blank, so no P/E for this issue can be worked out and this study has no section 16.
17Risks, in plain words
Customers: the company has no long-term contracts and sells order by order (RHP p.42) → revenue depends on repeat orders from a customer list that has changed → the top ten customers were 51.18% of FY26 product sales, and the largest customer's share went from 38.84% in FY24 to 12.02% in FY26 (RHP p.45).
Group entities: four promoter group entities are in the same trade (RHP p.30) → sales, purchases and exports have run through them, and the non-compete agreements date only from March and April 2026 (RHP p.195) → sales to the two main group entities were ₹23,614.40 lakh in FY24 and ₹2,649.80 lakh in FY26 by our arithmetic (RHP p.25).
Cotton prices: cotton arrives mainly from November to March and its price moves with weather and trade policy (RHP p.31) → the company has no hedging contracts on cotton or yarn prices (RHP p.49) → cotton, traded goods and stock change took 92.5% of FY26 revenue by our arithmetic (RHP p.66).
Margin: FY26 profit after tax was ₹368.78 lakh on revenue of ₹40,801.01 lakh (RHP p.115) → a small change in the gap between cotton and yarn prices moves profit a long way → 1% of FY26 revenue is ₹408.01 lakh by our arithmetic, more than FY26 profit after tax.
Subsidy and incentives: other operating revenue of ₹403.31 lakh in FY26 was export incentives and a yarn VAT subsidy (RHP p.244) → it comes from government schemes, not from sales → it equals about 79% of FY26 profit before tax of ₹512.87 lakh by our arithmetic (RHP p.66).
Capacity: yarn capacity use fell from 81.38% in FY24 to 67.05% in FY26 (RHP p.29) → the spinning unit's fixed costs are spread over less output → the issue-funded machinery adds no capacity (RHP p.105).
Regulation: the plant's pollution control consent was valid to June 30, 2026 (RHP p.289) → the prospectus says a failure to obtain or renew approvals could affect operations (RHP p.34) → the renewal applied for on June 15, 2026 was still pending at the date of the prospectus (RHP p.290).
Export obligation: duty-free imports under an advance authorisation carry an export obligation of ₹590.47 lakh FOB, valid to September 30, 2027 (RHP p.49) → if it is not met, the duty saved must be repaid with interest (RHP p.49) → the duty at stake is ₹303.97 lakh (RHP p.49).
Financial: 82.09% of borrowings at April 30, 2026 were payable on demand (RHP p.261) → working capital lines can be recalled or repriced → cash credit was ₹4,135.08 lakh of borrowings of ₹5,842.87 lakh (RHP p.259).
Promoters: promoter loans of ₹661.71 lakh at March 2026 have no repayment terms and can be recalled (RHP p.46) → a recall would fall on the bank lines → the Managing Director also faces reassessment on ₹2,628.25 lakh of income alleged to have escaped assessment, by our arithmetic on the three years (RHP p.275).
Issue-specific: the price, bid lot and general corporate purposes amount are blank (RHP p.305) → the reader cannot yet see what the issue raises → there is no monitoring agency (RHP p.111), and no machinery order has been placed (RHP p.103).
18Litigation and regulatory matters
| Matter | Party | Amount | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| GST demand for April 2020 to March 2021, input credit from a supplier with cancelled registration | Company, as the LLP | ₹54.37 lakh | appeal filed January 28, 2026; demand stayed (RHP p.275) |
| TDS shortfalls shown on the tax portal | Company and the LLP | ₹1.25 lakh | no recovery action yet (RHP p.274) |
| Scrutiny assessment notice of June 20, 2026 | Company | not quantified | pending (RHP p.274) |
| Reassessment of income for AY 2019-20 to 2021-22 | Nirav Bharatbhai Patel | ₹2,628.25 lakh of income; tax not stated | pending (RHP p.275) |
| Income tax demand and interest | Ranjanben Bharatbhai Patel | ₹1,780 | pending (RHP p.276) |
| Faceless assessment for AY 2025-26 | Vishnubhai Prahaladdas Patel | not quantified | pending (RHP p.276) |
| 14 tax matters, mostly GST demands | Group entities | ₹916.62 lakh | appeals and replies pending (RHP p.39) |
| Six cheque-dishonour complaints filed as lender | Truepay Finance Private Limited | ₹138.22 lakh | pending (RHP p.39) |
There is no criminal case, regulatory action or disciplinary action against the company (RHP p.274) or against its directors and promoters (RHP p.275). The largest group matter is a GST order of ₹6,01,03,394 against Ambica Cotseeds Limited for July 2017 to March 2019, under appeal (RHP p.279); several Ambica Cotseeds Limited and Vivekanand Industries orders allege input credit claimed on bills without goods being received (RHP p.278). The company's own summary table puts the five tax matters against directors and promoters at ₹0.02 lakh, with the amount for four not ascertained (RHP p.39). Amounts shown as not quantified are not zero.
20What the offer document does not say
Tonnes sold and prices per kilogram are not disclosed for any product or year. How much of the yarn and bales sold were made at Kadi and how much were traded is not disclosed; all product sales are labelled manufacturing (RHP p.172). Customer and supplier names are not given (RHP p.45). The floor price, cap price and bid lot are blank (RHP p.305); so are the issue amount and the general corporate purposes amount (RHP p.100), and the issue expenses (RHP p.110). The tax at stake in the Managing Director's reassessment is not stated (RHP p.275). The addressable market is not sized, and ginning utilisation by season is not given.
The prospectus's own figures also disagree in places. The industry chapter shows FY25 EBITDA as a negative ₹6,087.77 lakh (RHP p.159) against ₹1,458.92 lakh in the key indicators (RHP p.115). FY25 profit before tax is ₹457.74 lakh on one page (RHP p.267) and ₹473.65 lakh on the next spread (RHP p.269). Yarn capacity is given as 4,551 kilograms in one place (RHP p.28) and 4,551 tonnes in the certified table (RHP p.29).
The MD&A says the business is not seasonal (RHP p.271), while the risk factors describe seasonal cotton buying (RHP p.42). The notes say provident fund and gratuity rules do not apply because work is done by contract labour (RHP p.256), while the company paid provident fund for 22 employees in FY26 (RHP p.38) and provides for gratuity (RHP p.250).
21Five questions for management
- How many tonnes of cotton yarn and cotton bales were sold in each of FY24, FY25 and FY26, and at what average price per kilogram?
- Of FY26 yarn sales of ₹21,080.23 lakh, how much was spun at Kadi and how much was purchased and resold, and at what gross margin each?
- How much of the ₹202.26 lakh yarn VAT subsidy recognised in FY26 was received in cash, under which scheme, and until what date does the scheme run?
- Who replaced the group entities as buyers between FY24 and FY26, and what share of FY26 product sales came from customers first served in FY25 or FY26?
- What tax, if any, has been assessed on the ₹2,628.25 lakh of income alleged to have escaped assessment in the Managing Director's hands, and does any of it relate to the LLP's transactions?
1Sources and cited facts
This study was read from 1 document the company filed. The 206 figures it cites are listed under the document each came from, with the page and the sentence as printed.
Show all 206 cited facts, with the page and the sentence as printedHide the cited facts
- 1At a glanceWhat the company does: gins raw cotton (kapas) into cotton bales and cotton seed, spins bales into cotton yarn at one plant at Rangpurda, Kadi, in Mahesana district, Gujarat, and also trades cotton bales and yarn (RHP p.160).p.160
“What the company does: gins raw cotton (kapas) into cotton bales and cotton seed, spins bales into cotton yarn at one plant at Rangpurda, Kadi, in Mahesana district, Gujarat, and also trades cotton bales and yarn (RHP p.160).”
- 2At a glanceWho pays it: local fabric producers, corporate buyers and overseas customers (RHP p.177), whom the prospectus does not name because they have not consented (RHP p.45).p.177
“Who pays it: local fabric producers, corporate buyers and overseas customers (RHP p.177), whom the prospectus does not name because they have not consented (RHP p.45).”
- 3At a glanceTwo group entities, Ambica Cotseeds Limited and Vivekanand Industries, took 38.46% and 27.62% of FY24 revenue, and 3.21% and 3.28% of FY26 revenue (RHP p.25).p.25
“Two group entities, Ambica Cotseeds Limited and Vivekanand Industries, took 38.46% and 27.62% of FY24 revenue, and 3.21% and 3.28% of FY26 revenue (RHP p.25).”
- 4At a glanceWhy it is raising money: ₹1,100.00 lakh for working capital and ₹526.89 lakh for new spinning machinery, with a balance not yet stated for general corporate purposes (RHP p.100).p.100
“Why it is raising money: ₹1,100.00 lakh for working capital and ₹526.89 lakh for new spinning machinery, with a balance not yet stated for general corporate purposes (RHP p.100).”
- 5At a glanceHow fast it has grown: revenue from ₹35,738.81 lakh in FY24 to ₹40,801.01 lakh in FY26, and profit after tax from ₹335.33 lakh to ₹368.78 lakh (RHP p.115); by our arithmetic that is about 6.8% and 4.9% a year.p.115
“How fast it has grown: revenue from ₹35,738.81 lakh in FY24 to ₹40,801.01 lakh in FY26, and profit after tax from ₹335.33 lakh to ₹368.78 lakh (RHP p.115); by our arithmetic that is about 6.8% and 4.9% a year.”
- 6At a glanceFY26 profit after tax was 0.90% of revenue (RHP p.115), and export incentives and a yarn VAT subsidy of ₹403.31 lakh (RHP p.244) came to about 79% of FY26 profit before tax of ₹512.87 lakh by our arithmetic (RHP p.66).p.115
“FY26 profit after tax was 0.90% of revenue (RHP p.115), and export incentives and a yarn VAT subsidy of ₹403.31 lakh (RHP p.244) came to about 79% of FY26 profit before tax of ₹512.87 lakh by our arithmetic (RHP p.66).”
- 7The business, in plain wordsThe business began as Vivekanand Cotspin LLP in July 2015, became a private company on August 5, 2024 and a public company on December 16, 2024 (RHP p.2).p.2
“The business began as Vivekanand Cotspin LLP in July 2015, became a private company on August 5, 2024 and a public company on December 16, 2024 (RHP p.2).”
- 8The business, in plain wordsIt runs a ginning unit and a spinning unit of 25,536 spindles at Kadi (RHP p.28).p.28
“It runs a ginning unit and a spinning unit of 25,536 spindles at Kadi (RHP p.28).”
- 9The business, in plain wordsGinning separates cotton fibre from seed and presses the fibre into bales; spinning turns bales into yarn for weaving and knitting (RHP p.160).p.160
“Ginning separates cotton fibre from seed and presses the fibre into bales; spinning turns bales into yarn for weaving and knitting (RHP p.160).”
- 10The business, in plain wordsKapas is procured from farmers and agricultural markets (mandis) in Gujarat (RHP p.179).p.179
“Kapas is procured from farmers and agricultural markets (mandis) in Gujarat (RHP p.179).”
- 11The business, in plain wordsThe company also trades: in FY26 its purchases of traded goods were ₹13,341.37 lakh against revenue of ₹40,801.01 lakh (RHP p.66).p.66
“The company also trades: in FY26 its purchases of traded goods were ₹13,341.37 lakh against revenue of ₹40,801.01 lakh (RHP p.66).”
- 12The business, in plain wordsCustomers are given credit of 6 to 12 days (RHP p.51), and bales and yarn are sold mostly through brokers (RHP p.180).p.51
“Customers are given credit of 6 to 12 days (RHP p.51), and bales and yarn are sold mostly through brokers (RHP p.180).”
- 13The business, in plain wordsPart of the cotton seed from ginning is sold to Vivekanand Industries, which processes it into oil and cake, and Ambica Cotseeds Limited has exported the company's yarn and bales (RHP p.26).p.26
“Part of the cotton seed from ginning is sold to Vivekanand Industries, which processes it into oil and cake, and Ambica Cotseeds Limited has exported the company's yarn and bales (RHP p.26).”
- 14The business, in plain wordsThe company had 146 employees on payroll at May 30, 2026, 131 of them in production (RHP p.180), and runs a 4 MW ground-mounted solar plant for its own power (RHP p.177).p.180
“The company had 146 employees on payroll at May 30, 2026, 131 of them in production (RHP p.180), and runs a 4 MW ground-mounted solar plant for its own power (RHP p.177).”
- 15The business, in plain wordsIn FY26 cotton, traded goods and the change in stock took ₹37,739.90 lakh, 92.5% of revenue by our arithmetic (RHP p.66).p.66
“In FY26 cotton, traded goods and the change in stock took ₹37,739.90 lakh, 92.5% of revenue by our arithmetic (RHP p.66).”
- 16The business, in plain wordsPower and fuel cost ₹580.72 lakh (RHP p.246), and finance cost ₹556.81 lakh (RHP p.66).p.246
“Power and fuel cost ₹580.72 lakh (RHP p.246), and finance cost ₹556.81 lakh (RHP p.66).”
- 17Where the money comes fromFY25 adds the LLP's period to August 4, 2024 and the company's period from August 5, 2024, by our arithmetic; the total matches the FY25 product sales the prospectus uses for its customer table (RHP p.177).p.177
“FY25 adds the LLP's period to August 4, 2024 and the company's period from August 5, 2024, by our arithmetic; the total matches the FY25 product sales the prospectus uses for its customer table (RHP p.177).”
- 18Where the money comes fromExport incentives and a yarn VAT subsidy come on top as other operating revenue: ₹350.89 lakh in FY24 and ₹403.31 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.244).p.244
“Export incentives and a yarn VAT subsidy come on top as other operating revenue: ₹350.89 lakh in FY24 and ₹403.31 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.244).”
- 19Where the money comes fromGujarat took 89.40% of FY24 product sales and 81.21% of FY26 product sales (RHP p.172).p.172
“Gujarat took 89.40% of FY24 product sales and 81.21% of FY26 product sales (RHP p.172).”
- 20Where the money comes fromExports were ₹3,191.14 lakh, 9.02%, in FY24 and ₹4,137.00 lakh, 10.24%, in FY26, of which China was ₹2,572.58 lakh after no sales there in the earlier years (RHP p.34).p.34
“Exports were ₹3,191.14 lakh, 9.02%, in FY24 and ₹4,137.00 lakh, 10.24%, in FY26, of which China was ₹2,572.58 lakh after no sales there in the earlier years (RHP p.34).”
- 21Where the money comes fromRead from the filing: the largest customer's FY24 figure of ₹13,743.42 lakh (RHP p.45) equals the prospectus's FY24 sales to Ambica Cotseeds Limited, and the second customer's ₹9,870.98 lakh equals FY24 sales to Vivekanand Industries (RHP p.25).p.45
“Read from the filing: the largest customer's FY24 figure of ₹13,743.42 lakh (RHP p.45) equals the prospectus's FY24 sales to Ambica Cotseeds Limited, and the second customer's ₹9,870.98 lakh equals FY24 sales to Vivekanand Industries (RHP p.25).”
- 22Where the money comes fromIn FY26 the two group entities' sales of ₹1,339.17 lakh and ₹1,310.63 lakh match the seventh and eighth customers in the top-ten list (RHP p.177).p.177
“In FY26 the two group entities' sales of ₹1,339.17 lakh and ₹1,310.63 lakh match the seventh and eighth customers in the top-ten list (RHP p.177).”
- 23The growth recordFY25 is the prospectus's own sum of two periods, the LLP from April 1 to August 4, 2024 and the company from August 5, 2024 to March 31, 2025 (RHP p.268).p.268
“FY25 is the prospectus's own sum of two periods, the LLP from April 1 to August 4, 2024 and the company from August 5, 2024 to March 31, 2025 (RHP p.268).”
- 24The growth recordFY25 profit includes a deferred tax credit of ₹155.31 lakh (RHP p.66), which the prospectus attributes to the fall in tax rate from 34.94% for the LLP to 25.17% for the company (RHP p.267).p.66
“FY25 profit includes a deferred tax credit of ₹155.31 lakh (RHP p.66), which the prospectus attributes to the fall in tax rate from 34.94% for the LLP to 25.17% for the company (RHP p.267).”
- 25The growth recordProfit before tax, which that credit does not touch, was ₹524.24 lakh in FY24 and ₹512.87 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.66), and ₹457.74 lakh in FY25 (RHP p.267).p.66
“Profit before tax, which that credit does not touch, was ₹524.24 lakh in FY24 and ₹512.87 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.66), and ₹457.74 lakh in FY25 (RHP p.267).”
- 26The growth recordOur arithmetic: revenue grew about 6.8% a year from FY24 to FY26, EBITDA about 1.7% and profit after tax about 4.9%; the EBITDA margin fell about 38 basis points and the PAT margin about 3 basis points (RHP p.115).p.115
“Our arithmetic: revenue grew about 6.8% a year from FY24 to FY26, EBITDA about 1.7% and profit after tax about 4.9%; the EBITDA margin fell about 38 basis points and the PAT margin about 3 basis points (RHP p.115).”
- 27
“Trade receivable days were 6 in FY24, 9 in FY25 and 12 in FY26 (RHP p.109).”
- 28What the growth is made ofRevenue from operations rose from ₹35,738.81 lakh in FY24 to ₹40,801.01 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.115), an increase of ₹5,062.20 lakh by our arithmetic.p.115
“Revenue from operations rose from ₹35,738.81 lakh in FY24 to ₹40,801.01 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.115), an increase of ₹5,062.20 lakh by our arithmetic.”
- 29What the growth is made ofYarn sales rose from ₹9,742.95 lakh to ₹21,080.23 lakh while bale sales fell from ₹21,041.68 lakh to ₹15,650.16 lakh (RHP p.38).p.38
“Yarn sales rose from ₹9,742.95 lakh to ₹21,080.23 lakh while bale sales fell from ₹21,041.68 lakh to ₹15,650.16 lakh (RHP p.38).”
- 30What the growth is made ofOver the same years the company's own yarn output fell from 3,703 tonnes to 3,051 tonnes (RHP p.29), and purchases of traded goods were ₹12,754.25 lakh in FY24 and ₹13,341.37 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.66).p.29
“Over the same years the company's own yarn output fell from 3,703 tonnes to 3,051 tonnes (RHP p.29), and purchases of traded goods were ₹12,754.25 lakh in FY24 and ₹13,341.37 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.66).”
- 31What the growth is made ofThe prospectus does not say how much of the yarn sold was spun at Kadi and how much was traded, and it labels all product sales as manufacturing (RHP p.172).p.172
“The prospectus does not say how much of the yarn sold was spun at Kadi and how much was traded, and it labels all product sales as manufacturing (RHP p.172).”
- 32What the growth is made ofThe MD&A attributes FY26 growth mainly to exports (RHP p.266), which rose from ₹768.30 lakh in the period to March 2025 to ₹4,137.00 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.34).p.266
“The MD&A attributes FY26 growth mainly to exports (RHP p.266), which rose from ₹768.30 lakh in the period to March 2025 to ₹4,137.00 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.34).”
- 33What the growth is made ofSales to the two group entities fell from ₹23,614.40 lakh in FY24 to ₹2,649.80 lakh in FY26 by our arithmetic (RHP p.25), so revenue from all other customers rose from about ₹12,124.41 lakh to about ₹38,151.21 lakh.p.25
“Sales to the two group entities fell from ₹23,614.40 lakh in FY24 to ₹2,649.80 lakh in FY26 by our arithmetic (RHP p.25), so revenue from all other customers rose from about ₹12,124.41 lakh to about ₹38,151.21 lakh.”
- 34Earnings qualityOperating cash flow against profit | ₹2,934.72 lakh against ₹1,198.40 lakh over FY24 to FY26, 2.4 times by our arithmetic; FY25 was an outflow of ₹371.96 lakh (RHP p.117)p.117
“Operating cash flow against profit | ₹2,934.72 lakh against ₹1,198.40 lakh over FY24 to FY26, 2.4 times by our arithmetic; FY25 was an outflow of ₹371.96 lakh (RHP p.117)”
- 35
“Receivable days | 6, 9 and 12 in FY24, FY25 and FY26 (RHP p.107)”
- 36
“Inventory days | 23, 29 and 20 (RHP p.107)”
- 37
“Payable days | 10, 14 and 4 (RHP p.107)”
- 38Earnings qualityNet working capital as % of revenue | 3.8% in FY24 and 8.7% in FY26 by our arithmetic (RHP p.41)p.41
“Net working capital as % of revenue | 3.8% in FY24 and 8.7% in FY26 by our arithmetic (RHP p.41)”
- 39Earnings qualityOther income | ₹131.14 lakh in FY26, of which ₹99.83 lakh was foreign exchange gain (RHP p.245)p.245
“Other income | ₹131.14 lakh in FY26, of which ₹99.83 lakh was foreign exchange gain (RHP p.245)”
- 40Earnings qualityExport incentives and subsidy | ₹403.31 lakh in FY26: duty drawback ₹80.42 lakh, RoDTEP ₹120.63 lakh, yarn VAT subsidy ₹202.26 lakh (RHP p.244)p.244
“Export incentives and subsidy | ₹403.31 lakh in FY26: duty drawback ₹80.42 lakh, RoDTEP ₹120.63 lakh, yarn VAT subsidy ₹202.26 lakh (RHP p.244)”
- 41Earnings qualityRelated-party share of revenue | 66.08% in FY24 and 6.49% in FY26 by our arithmetic (RHP p.25)p.25
“Related-party share of revenue | 66.08% in FY24 and 6.49% in FY26 by our arithmetic (RHP p.25)”
- 42Earnings qualityExceptional items | loss of ₹15.91 lakh on destroyed plant, net of insurance, in the period to March 2025 (RHP p.246)p.246
“Exceptional items | loss of ₹15.91 lakh on destroyed plant, net of insurance, in the period to March 2025 (RHP p.246)”
- 43Earnings qualityRestatement | period to March 2025: audited profit ₹225.88 lakh, restated ₹407.38 lakh (RHP p.248)p.248
“Restatement | period to March 2025: audited profit ₹225.88 lakh, restated ₹407.38 lakh (RHP p.248)”
- 44
“Auditor qualifications | none requiring adjustment (RHP p.227)”
- 45Earnings qualityIn FY26 export incentives and the yarn VAT subsidy (₹403.31 lakh) and other income (₹131.14 lakh) together came to ₹534.45 lakh by our arithmetic, more than profit before tax of ₹512.87 lakh (RHP p.66).p.66
“In FY26 export incentives and the yarn VAT subsidy (₹403.31 lakh) and other income (₹131.14 lakh) together came to ₹534.45 lakh by our arithmetic, more than profit before tax of ₹512.87 lakh (RHP p.66).”
- 46Earnings qualityA yarn VAT subsidy receivable of ₹145.03 lakh was outstanding at March 2026 (RHP p.243).p.243
“A yarn VAT subsidy receivable of ₹145.03 lakh was outstanding at March 2026 (RHP p.243).”
- 47Earnings qualityThe restatement raised profit for the period to March 2025 by ₹181.50 lakh, mostly a deferred tax adjustment of ₹160.51 lakh (RHP p.248), while ₹180.92 lakh of prior-year tax was charged straight to reserves rather than to profit (RHP p.237).p.248
“The restatement raised profit for the period to March 2025 by ₹181.50 lakh, mostly a deferred tax adjustment of ₹160.51 lakh (RHP p.248), while ₹180.92 lakh of prior-year tax was charged straight to reserves rather than to profit (RHP p.237).”
- 48Earnings qualityThe restated statements are signed by a peer-review auditor, S V J K and Associates, not by the statutory auditor, Mistry & Shah LLP (RHP p.39).p.39
“The restated statements are signed by a peer-review auditor, S V J K and Associates, not by the statutory auditor, Mistry & Shah LLP (RHP p.39).”
- 49Earnings qualityThe FY24 cash inflow came with a ₹1,378.90 lakh rise in payables, and the FY25 outflow with a ₹1,481.91 lakh rise in receivables in the period to March 2025 (RHP p.67).p.67
“The FY24 cash inflow came with a ₹1,378.90 lakh rise in payables, and the FY25 outflow with a ₹1,481.91 lakh rise in receivables in the period to March 2025 (RHP p.67).”
- 50The balance sheetAt March 31, 2026 borrowings were ₹4,499.52 lakh against net worth of ₹2,893.57 lakh, a debt to equity ratio of 1.56 (RHP p.258).p.258
“At March 31, 2026 borrowings were ₹4,499.52 lakh against net worth of ₹2,893.57 lakh, a debt to equity ratio of 1.56 (RHP p.258).”
- 51The balance sheetThey were made up of Bank of Baroda term loans of ₹1,087.23 lakh at 8.15% and 9.25% (RHP p.237), cash credit of ₹2,750.58 lakh (RHP p.239) and unsecured loans from five promoters of ₹661.71 lakh (RHP p.238).p.237
“They were made up of Bank of Baroda term loans of ₹1,087.23 lakh at 8.15% and 9.25% (RHP p.237), cash credit of ₹2,750.58 lakh (RHP p.239) and unsecured loans from five promoters of ₹661.71 lakh (RHP p.238).”
- 52
“Cash was ₹29.75 lakh (RHP p.65).”
- 53The balance sheetBy April 30, 2026 borrowings were ₹5,842.87 lakh, including cash credit of ₹4,135.08 lakh (RHP p.259), and 82.09% of borrowings were payable on demand (RHP p.261).p.259
“By April 30, 2026 borrowings were ₹5,842.87 lakh, including cash credit of ₹4,135.08 lakh (RHP p.259), and 82.09% of borrowings were payable on demand (RHP p.261).”
- 54The balance sheetThe company has no lease liabilities on its balance sheet; its plant land and buildings are leased from Avadh Cotton Industries and from promoters at ₹2.40 lakh a year for each lease (RHP p.182).p.182
“The company has no lease liabilities on its balance sheet; its plant land and buildings are leased from Avadh Cotton Industries and from promoters at ₹2.40 lakh a year for each lease (RHP p.182).”
- 55
“Contingent liabilities were ₹54.37 lakh, a disputed GST demand (RHP p.247).”
- 56The balance sheetAn export obligation of ₹590.47 lakh FOB is open under an advance authorisation, with a duty liability of ₹303.97 lakh if it is not met (RHP p.49).p.49
“An export obligation of ₹590.47 lakh FOB is open under an advance authorisation, with a duty liability of ₹303.97 lakh if it is not met (RHP p.49).”
- 57The balance sheetGuarantees: Nirav Bharatbhai Patel, Jasmin Vishnubhai Patel, Bharatbhai Prahaladbhai Patel, Vishnubhai Prahaladdas Patel and Gautam Bharatkumar Patel have given personal guarantees, and the term loans are also secured by mortgages of land owned by Ranjanben Bharatbhai Patel and Kapilaben Vishnubhai p.260
“Guarantees: Nirav Bharatbhai Patel, Jasmin Vishnubhai Patel, Bharatbhai Prahaladbhai Patel, Vishnubhai Prahaladdas Patel and Gautam Bharatkumar Patel have given personal guarantees, and the term loans are also secured by mortgages of land owned by Ranjanben Bharatbhai Patel and Kapilaben Vishnubhai Patel, by Avadh Cotton Industries, and by Bharatbhai Prahaladbhai Patel and Vishnubhai Prahaladdas Patel (RHP p.260).”
- 58The balance sheetAfter the issue: the issue amount is blank, so the balance sheet after the fresh issue cannot be worked out, and the capitalisation statement leaves the post-issue column blank too (RHP p.258).p.258
“After the issue: the issue amount is blank, so the balance sheet after the fresh issue cannot be worked out, and the capitalisation statement leaves the post-issue column blank too (RHP p.258).”
- 59
“None of the proceeds is earmarked for repaying debt (RHP p.100).”
- 60What the money is forMachinery: three comber machines at ₹148.89 lakh, six compact spinning systems at ₹176.20 lakh and one automatic cone winder of 44 drums at ₹199.22 lakh including customs duty, from quotations dated June 30 and August 12, 2026 (RHP p.103).p.103
“Machinery: three comber machines at ₹148.89 lakh, six compact spinning systems at ₹176.20 lakh and one automatic cone winder of 44 drums at ₹199.22 lakh including customs duty, from quotations dated June 30 and August 12, 2026 (RHP p.103).”
- 61What the money is forThe quotations add up to ₹524.31 lakh (RHP p.103), ₹2.58 lakh less than the ₹526.89 lakh in the objects table; the prospectus does not explain the difference.p.103
“The quotations add up to ₹524.31 lakh (RHP p.103), ₹2.58 lakh less than the ₹526.89 lakh in the objects table; the prospectus does not explain the difference.”
- 62What the money is forNo orders have been placed, and the cone winder quotation was valid up to September 15, 2026 (RHP p.103).p.103
“No orders have been placed, and the cone winder quotation was valid up to September 15, 2026 (RHP p.103).”
- 63What the money is forOrders are to be placed in September 2026, with commercial production from January 2027 (RHP p.106).p.106
“Orders are to be placed in September 2026, with commercial production from January 2027 (RHP p.106).”
- 64What the money is forThe machinery adds no capacity; it is to make combed and compact yarn (RHP p.105).p.105
“The machinery adds no capacity; it is to make combed and compact yarn (RHP p.105).”
- 65What the money is forWorking capital: the company puts its FY28 working capital need at ₹6,974.87 lakh, of which ₹1,100.00 lakh is to come from the issue (RHP p.100).p.100
“Working capital: the company puts its FY28 working capital need at ₹6,974.87 lakh, of which ₹1,100.00 lakh is to come from the issue (RHP p.100).”
- 66What the money is forGeneral corporate purposes: at most 15% of gross proceeds or ₹1,000 lakh, whichever is lower (RHP p.100).p.100
“General corporate purposes: at most 15% of gross proceeds or ₹1,000 lakh, whichever is lower (RHP p.100).”
- 67What the money is forNo monitoring agency is required because the issue is below ₹5,000 lakh (RHP p.111).p.111
“No monitoring agency is required because the issue is below ₹5,000 lakh (RHP p.111).”
- 68What the money is forThe issue: up to 60,00,000 new shares of ₹10 face value, 26.97% of the capital after the issue (RHP p.2).p.2
“The issue: up to 60,00,000 new shares of ₹10 face value, 26.97% of the capital after the issue (RHP p.2).”
- 69What the money is forOf these, 3,00,000 are reserved for the market maker; of the net issue of 57,00,000 shares, not more than 28,50,000 go to qualified institutions (up to 17,10,000 to anchors), not less than 8,55,000 to non-institutional bidders and not less than 19,95,000 to individual investors (RHP p.63).p.63
“Of these, 3,00,000 are reserved for the market maker; of the net issue of 57,00,000 shares, not more than 28,50,000 go to qualified institutions (up to 17,10,000 to anchors), not less than 8,55,000 to non-institutional bidders and not less than 19,95,000 to individual investors (RHP p.63).”
- 70What the money is forThe prospectus gives an anchor bid date of September 18, 2026, bidding from September 21 to 23, 2026 and trading on or about September 28, 2026 (RHP p.307).p.307
“The prospectus gives an anchor bid date of September 18, 2026, bidding from September 21 to 23, 2026 and trading on or about September 28, 2026 (RHP p.307).”
- 71What the money is forThe floor price, cap price and bid lot are blank (RHP p.305), and individual investors must apply for at least two lots, above ₹2 lakh (RHP p.306).p.305
“The floor price, cap price and bid lot are blank (RHP p.305), and individual investors must apply for at least two lots, above ₹2 lakh (RHP p.306).”
- 72What the money is forSwastika Investmart Limited is the book running lead manager (RHP p.1), and Sunflower Broking Private Limited the market maker (RHP p.84).p.1
“Swastika Investmart Limited is the book running lead manager (RHP p.1), and Sunflower Broking Private Limited the market maker (RHP p.84).”
- 73What the money is for> Into the business the whole issue: up to 60,00,000 new shares, at a price the prospectus leaves blank (RHP p.1).p.1
“> Into the business the whole issue: up to 60,00,000 new shares, at a price the prospectus leaves blank (RHP p.1).”
- 74
“> To selling shareholders nothing: there is no offer for sale (RHP p.1).”
- 75
“The whole issue is new shares and the offer for sale is nil (RHP p.1).”
- 76
“The promoters and promoter group will not bid in the issue (RHP p.99).”
- 77PromotersThe prospectus names nine promoters: Nirav Bharatbhai Patel, Jasmin Vishnubhai Patel, Bharatbhai Prahaladbhai Patel, Vishnubhai Prahaladdas Patel, Gautam Bharatkumar Patel, B P Patel Family Trust, V P Patel Family Trust, Ranjanben Bharatbhai Patel and Kapilaben Vishnubhai Patel (RHP p.1).p.1
“The prospectus names nine promoters: Nirav Bharatbhai Patel, Jasmin Vishnubhai Patel, Bharatbhai Prahaladbhai Patel, Vishnubhai Prahaladdas Patel, Gautam Bharatkumar Patel, B P Patel Family Trust, V P Patel Family Trust, Ranjanben Bharatbhai Patel and Kapilaben Vishnubhai Patel (RHP p.1).”
- 78PromotersIt states that Bharatbhai Prahaladbhai Patel and Vishnubhai Prahaladdas Patel are brothers, that Nirav Bharatbhai Patel is a son of Bharatbhai Prahaladbhai Patel and that Jasmin Vishnubhai Patel is a son of Vishnubhai Prahaladdas Patel (RHP p.199).p.199
“It states that Bharatbhai Prahaladbhai Patel and Vishnubhai Prahaladdas Patel are brothers, that Nirav Bharatbhai Patel is a son of Bharatbhai Prahaladbhai Patel and that Jasmin Vishnubhai Patel is a son of Vishnubhai Prahaladdas Patel (RHP p.199).”
- 79PromotersIt lists Gautam Bharatkumar Patel as a son of Bharatbhai Prahaladbhai Patel and Ranjanben Bharatbhai Patel, and Kapilaben Vishnubhai Patel as the spouse of Vishnubhai Prahaladdas Patel (RHP p.219).p.219
“It lists Gautam Bharatkumar Patel as a son of Bharatbhai Prahaladbhai Patel and Ranjanben Bharatbhai Patel, and Kapilaben Vishnubhai Patel as the spouse of Vishnubhai Prahaladdas Patel (RHP p.219).”
- 80PromotersNirav Bharatbhai Patel has been Chairman and Managing Director since January 17, 2025 and has 15 years in cotton ginning and spinning; Jasmin Vishnubhai Patel is Whole Time Director with 6 years (RHP p.197).p.197
“Nirav Bharatbhai Patel has been Chairman and Managing Director since January 17, 2025 and has 15 years in cotton ginning and spinning; Jasmin Vishnubhai Patel is Whole Time Director with 6 years (RHP p.197).”
- 81PromotersBharatbhai Prahaladbhai Patel and Vishnubhai Prahaladdas Patel are non-executive directors with 15 years each (RHP p.198).p.198
“Bharatbhai Prahaladbhai Patel and Vishnubhai Prahaladdas Patel are non-executive directors with 15 years each (RHP p.198).”
- 82
“Gautam Bharatkumar Patel is not a director and has 9 years in textiles (RHP p.213).”
- 83PromotersThe prospectus says Ranjanben Bharatbhai Patel and Kapilaben Vishnubhai Patel have limited experience in this business (RHP p.40).p.40
“The prospectus says Ranjanben Bharatbhai Patel and Kapilaben Vishnubhai Patel have limited experience in this business (RHP p.40).”
- 84
“The two family trusts were created on December 17, 2024 (RHP p.214).”
- 85Promotersin Singapore (merchant trading), Vivekanand Industries (ginning and cotton-seed oil) and Avadh Cotton Industries (ginning) are in the same trade, and Truepay Finance Private Limited is a finance company (RHP p.30).p.30
“in Singapore (merchant trading), Vivekanand Industries (ginning and cotton-seed oil) and Avadh Cotton Industries (ginning) are in the same trade, and Truepay Finance Private Limited is a finance company (RHP p.30).”
- 86PromotersThe company signed non-compete agreements with the first four on March 24 and April 10, 2026 (RHP p.195).p.195
“The company signed non-compete agreements with the first four on March 24 and April 10, 2026 (RHP p.195).”
- 87PromotersWhat the company pays them: salaries of up to ₹30 lakh a year each are approved for the Managing Director and the Whole Time Director (RHP p.201), and none was paid for 2025-26 (RHP p.202).p.201
“What the company pays them: salaries of up to ₹30 lakh a year each are approved for the Managing Director and the Whole Time Director (RHP p.201), and none was paid for 2025-26 (RHP p.202).”
- 88PromotersThe company paid ₹167.85 lakh of interest on promoter loans in FY26 by our arithmetic (RHP p.71).p.71
“The company paid ₹167.85 lakh of interest on promoter loans in FY26 by our arithmetic (RHP p.71).”
- 89
“No promoter shares are pledged (RHP p.93).”
- 90PromotersLitigation and regulatory matters: Nirav Bharatbhai Patel faces income tax reassessment for assessment years 2019-20 to 2021-22, in which the assessing officer alleges that income of ₹7,13,46,338, ₹13,29,63,889 and ₹5,85,14,669 escaped assessment after Dena Bank flagged high-value transactions; respp.275
“Litigation and regulatory matters: Nirav Bharatbhai Patel faces income tax reassessment for assessment years 2019-20 to 2021-22, in which the assessing officer alleges that income of ₹7,13,46,338, ₹13,29,63,889 and ₹5,85,14,669 escaped assessment after Dena Bank flagged high-value transactions; responses have been filed and the matters are pending (RHP p.275).”
- 91PromotersNirav Bharatbhai Patel was also a director of Sun Ambica Energy Private Limited, which never started business and was struck off at its own request in February 2024 (RHP p.33).p.33
“Nirav Bharatbhai Patel was also a director of Sun Ambica Energy Private Limited, which never started business and was struck off at its own request in February 2024 (RHP p.33).”
- 92PromotersSome promoter group members are foreign nationals without PAN, and some Indian members have not filed income tax returns (RHP p.45).p.45
“Some promoter group members are foreign nationals without PAN, and some Indian members have not filed income tax returns (RHP p.45).”
- 93PromotersAugust 5, 2024: on conversion, the five partners were allotted 30,00,000 shares each at ₹10 against ₹1,500 lakh of fixed capital in the LLP, with no further cash (RHP p.236); the rest of the partners' balances became unsecured loans to the company (RHP p.261).p.236
“August 5, 2024: on conversion, the five partners were allotted 30,00,000 shares each at ₹10 against ₹1,500 lakh of fixed capital in the LLP, with no further cash (RHP p.236); the rest of the partners' balances became unsecured loans to the company (RHP p.261).”
- 94PromotersSeptember 30, 2024: Ranjanben Bharatbhai Patel acquired 100 shares at ₹10.95 (RHP p.94).p.94
“September 30, 2024: Ranjanben Bharatbhai Patel acquired 100 shares at ₹10.95 (RHP p.94).”
- 95
“February 6, 2025: 100 shares each were gifted to the two family trusts (RHP p.94).”
- 96PromotersMarch 25, 2026: a rights issue of 12,50,000 shares at ₹64, one for every twelve held, raised ₹800 lakh (RHP p.88).p.88
“March 25, 2026: a rights issue of 12,50,000 shares at ₹64, one for every twelve held, raised ₹800 lakh (RHP p.88).”
- 97PromotersAverage cost per share: ₹14.15 for the five individual promoters, ₹4.74 for each trust and ₹14.88 for Ranjanben Bharatbhai Patel (RHP p.51).p.51
“Average cost per share: ₹14.15 for the five individual promoters, ₹4.74 for each trust and ₹14.88 for Ranjanben Bharatbhai Patel (RHP p.51).”
- 98
“The company has nine shareholders (RHP p.99).”
- 99Who already owns itThe promoters hold 1,62,49,892 of the 1,62,50,000 shares and Preet Vishnubhai Patel, of the promoter group, holds 108 (RHP p.93).p.93
“The promoters hold 1,62,49,892 of the 1,62,50,000 shares and Preet Vishnubhai Patel, of the promoter group, holds 108 (RHP p.93).”
- 100
“Kapilaben Vishnubhai Patel holds no shares (RHP p.214).”
- 101Who already owns itThere is no private equity, venture capital or institutional holder, and no pre-IPO placement (RHP p.1).p.1
“There is no private equity, venture capital or institutional holder, and no pre-IPO placement (RHP p.1).”
- 102Who already owns itIf the whole issue is allotted, the promoters and promoter group would hold 73.03% of 2,22,50,000 shares by our arithmetic (RHP p.63).p.63
“If the whole issue is allotted, the promoters and promoter group would hold 73.03% of 2,22,50,000 shares by our arithmetic (RHP p.63).”
- 103Who already owns itOf the promoters' shares, 48,95,000, which is 22.00% of the capital after the issue, are locked in for three years (RHP p.96).p.96
“Of the promoters' shares, 48,95,000, which is 22.00% of the capital after the issue, are locked in for three years (RHP p.96).”
- 104What changed just before the IPOThe LLP became a private company on August 5, 2024 and a public company on December 16, 2024 (RHP p.2).p.2
“The LLP became a private company on August 5, 2024 and a public company on December 16, 2024 (RHP p.2).”
- 105What changed just before the IPOOn conversion, ₹1,500 lakh of partners' capital became share capital and the rest unsecured loans; promoter loans went from ₹31.07 lakh at August 4, 2024 to ₹1,861.71 lakh at March 31, 2025 and ₹661.71 lakh at March 31, 2026 (RHP p.261).p.261
“On conversion, ₹1,500 lakh of partners' capital became share capital and the rest unsecured loans; promoter loans went from ₹31.07 lakh at August 4, 2024 to ₹1,861.71 lakh at March 31, 2025 and ₹661.71 lakh at March 31, 2026 (RHP p.261).”
- 106What changed just before the IPOShah & Associates, audited it up to FY24; Mistry and Shah LLP became the company's first auditor on August 6, 2024 (RHP p.84).p.84
“Shah & Associates, audited it up to FY24; Mistry and Shah LLP became the company's first auditor on August 6, 2024 (RHP p.84).”
- 107What changed just before the IPOThe Managing Director, Whole Time Director and CFO were appointed on January 17, 2025 (RHP p.210); two independent directors left on December 9, 2025, their two replacements left on April 9, 2026, and the present two joined on April 16, 2026 (RHP p.204).p.210
“The Managing Director, Whole Time Director and CFO were appointed on January 17, 2025 (RHP p.210); two independent directors left on December 9, 2025, their two replacements left on April 9, 2026, and the present two joined on April 16, 2026 (RHP p.204).”
- 108
“The company secretary changed on June 29, 2026 (RHP p.210).”
- 109What changed just before the IPOThe plant land and buildings were leased from Avadh Cotton Industries and from promoters under leases of November 2024 running ten years from August 5, 2024 (RHP p.182).p.182
“The plant land and buildings were leased from Avadh Cotton Industries and from promoters under leases of November 2024 running ten years from August 5, 2024 (RHP p.182).”
- 110What changed just before the IPOA solar plant began supplying power in May 2024 (RHP p.268); power and fuel cost fell from ₹1,178.69 lakh in FY24 to ₹580.72 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.246).p.268
“A solar plant began supplying power in May 2024 (RHP p.268); power and fuel cost fell from ₹1,178.69 lakh in FY24 to ₹580.72 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.246).”
- 111What changed just before the IPOPurchases from related parties were 28.36% of purchases in FY24 and nil in FY26 (RHP p.49), and sales to group entities fell as set out in section 02.p.49
“Purchases from related parties were 28.36% of purchases in FY24 and nil in FY26 (RHP p.49), and sales to group entities fell as set out in section 02.”
- 112
“Exports to China of ₹2,572.58 lakh appeared in FY26 (RHP p.34).”
- 113What changed just before the IPOThe family trusts were created on December 17, 2024 (RHP p.214), non-compete agreements were signed in March and April 2026 (RHP p.195), and a ₹800 lakh rights issue at ₹64 was made on March 25, 2026 (RHP p.88).p.214
“The family trusts were created on December 17, 2024 (RHP p.214), non-compete agreements were signed in March and April 2026 (RHP p.195), and a ₹800 lakh rights issue at ₹64 was made on March 25, 2026 (RHP p.88).”
- 114What changed just before the IPORestatement raised profit for the period to March 2025 from ₹225.88 lakh to ₹407.38 lakh (RHP p.248).p.248
“Restatement raised profit for the period to March 2025 from ₹225.88 lakh to ₹407.38 lakh (RHP p.248).”
- 115What changed just before the IPOThe company records errors in two forms filed with the Registrar of Companies in 2025 (RHP p.32), and provident fund deposits in FY24 that were up to 106 days late (RHP p.37).p.32
“The company records errors in two forms filed with the Registrar of Companies in 2025 (RHP p.32), and provident fund deposits in FY24 that were up to 106 days late (RHP p.37).”
- 116Capacity and expansionThe prospectus attributes the fall in yarn capacity use to a shift towards value-added yarn and to cotton price swings, not to any plant constraint (RHP p.29).p.29
“The prospectus attributes the fall in yarn capacity use to a shift towards value-added yarn and to cotton price swings, not to any plant constraint (RHP p.29).”
- 117Capacity and expansionThe issue-funded machinery does not change installed capacity (RHP p.105).p.105
“The issue-funded machinery does not change installed capacity (RHP p.105).”
- 118Capacity and expansionThe company's own estimate, not this study's, is that shifting 2,500 kg a day from carded to combed yarn at about ₹10 a kilogram more, and 4,000 kg a day from combed to compact yarn at about ₹5 more, would add about ₹164.25 lakh of revenue a year at optimal use (RHP p.104).p.104
“The company's own estimate, not this study's, is that shifting 2,500 kg a day from carded to combed yarn at about ₹10 a kilogram more, and 4,000 kg a day from combed to compact yarn at about ₹5 more, would add about ₹164.25 lakh of revenue a year at optimal use (RHP p.104).”
- 119Market size and industry structureAs claimed: the industry chapter draws on the "Industry Report on Cotton Yarn" by Dun & Bradstreet dated August 14, 2026, which the company commissioned and paid for (RHP p.18).p.18
“As claimed: the industry chapter draws on the "Industry Report on Cotton Yarn" by Dun & Bradstreet dated August 14, 2026, which the company commissioned and paid for (RHP p.18).”
- 120Market size and industry structureThe commissioned report puts India's cotton yarn production at 3,756.00 thousand tonnes in FY2025 and apparent domestic consumption at 2,612.5 thousand tonnes (RHP p.148).p.148
“The commissioned report puts India's cotton yarn production at 3,756.00 thousand tonnes in FY2025 and apparent domestic consumption at 2,612.5 thousand tonnes (RHP p.148).”
- 121Market size and industry structureIt puts cotton yarn exports at 1,182.81 thousand tonnes in FY2026 (RHP p.153), with Bangladesh taking 43% and China 17% of exports in 2024-25 (RHP p.154).p.153
“It puts cotton yarn exports at 1,182.81 thousand tonnes in FY2026 (RHP p.153), with Bangladesh taking 43% and China 17% of exports in 2024-25 (RHP p.154).”
- 122Market size and industry structureWhat the company is today: 3,051 tonnes of yarn produced in FY26 (RHP p.29), about 0.08% of the national FY2025 production figure by our arithmetic, on figures for different years.p.29
“What the company is today: 3,051 tonnes of yarn produced in FY26 (RHP p.29), about 0.08% of the national FY2025 production figure by our arithmetic, on figures for different years.”
- 123Market size and industry structureStructure, from the commissioned report: spinning capacity is concentrated among 20 to 25 major mills (RHP p.156), while the wider textile industry is fragmented, with the top 30 organised players at about 13 to 15% (RHP p.156).p.156
“Structure, from the commissioned report: spinning capacity is concentrated among 20 to 25 major mills (RHP p.156), while the wider textile industry is fragmented, with the top 30 organised players at about 13 to 15% (RHP p.156).”
- 124Market size and industry structureRaw cotton is more than half of the cost of making yarn (RHP p.156), cotton arrives mainly from November to March (RHP p.31), and synthetic fibres compete with cotton yarn (RHP p.49).p.156
“Raw cotton is more than half of the cost of making yarn (RHP p.156), cotton arrives mainly from November to March (RHP p.31), and synthetic fibres compete with cotton yarn (RHP p.49).”
- 125Competitive positionWhere they overlap: Lagnam Spintex makes ring-spun and open-end cotton yarn with about 67,000 spindles (RHP p.156), and Deepak Spinners makes synthetic and blended yarns with 90,864 spindles (RHP p.157); neither is described as ginning cotton.p.156
“Where they overlap: Lagnam Spintex makes ring-spun and open-end cotton yarn with about 67,000 spindles (RHP p.156), and Deepak Spinners makes synthetic and blended yarns with 90,864 spindles (RHP p.157); neither is described as ginning cotton.”
- 126Competitive positionThe prospectus puts the working capital cycle of Lagnam Spintex at 129 days and of Deepak Spinners at 54 days in FY26 (RHP p.108), against 29 days for the company (RHP p.107).p.108
“The prospectus puts the working capital cycle of Lagnam Spintex at 129 days and of Deepak Spinners at 54 days in FY26 (RHP p.108), against 29 days for the company (RHP p.107).”
- 127Competitive positionWhy customers choose this company, as the prospectus puts it: quality, price and timely delivery (RHP p.181), with ginning and spinning at one site (RHP p.172).p.181
“Why customers choose this company, as the prospectus puts it: quality, price and timely delivery (RHP p.181), with ginning and spinning at one site (RHP p.172).”
- 128Competitive positionIt holds organic and recycled-content scope certificates valid to January 7, 2027, and its national organic certificate expired on April 17, 2026 with renewal pending (RHP p.289).p.289
“It holds organic and recycled-content scope certificates valid to January 7, 2027, and its national organic certificate expired on April 17, 2026 with renewal pending (RHP p.289).”
- 129
“Its logo trademark application stands objected (RHP p.182).”
- 130Competitive positionThe prospectus names competition from large integrated textile companies, regional manufacturers and overseas firms (RHP p.34).p.34
“The prospectus names competition from large integrated textile companies, regional manufacturers and overseas firms (RHP p.34).”
- 131Peers the company named> Peers named in the offer document: Deepak Spinners Limited and Lagnam Spintex Limited (RHP p.114).p.114
“> Peers named in the offer document: Deepak Spinners Limited and Lagnam Spintex Limited (RHP p.114).”
- 132Peers the company namedPeer P/E is on BSE closing prices of May 29, 2026 and FY26 diluted EPS (RHP p.114).p.114
“Peer P/E is on BSE closing prices of May 29, 2026 and FY26 diluted EPS (RHP p.114).”
- 133Peers the company namedThe prospectus gives an industry P/E range of 9.52 to 22.11 with an average of 15.81 (RHP p.113).p.113
“The prospectus gives an industry P/E range of 9.52 to 22.11 with an average of 15.81 (RHP p.113).”
- 134Peers the company namedThe company's FY26 EPS was ₹2.45 and its three-year weighted EPS ₹2.70 (RHP p.113).p.113
“The company's FY26 EPS was ₹2.45 and its three-year weighted EPS ₹2.70 (RHP p.113).”
- 135Peers the company namedDeepak Spinners' revenue is about 1.3 times the company's and Lagnam Spintex's about 1.5 times, by our arithmetic (RHP p.114).p.114
“Deepak Spinners' revenue is about 1.3 times the company's and Lagnam Spintex's about 1.5 times, by our arithmetic (RHP p.114).”
- 136
“Deepak Spinners is in a different segment, synthetic yarn (RHP p.157).”
- 137Risks, in plain wordsCustomers: the company has no long-term contracts and sells order by order (RHP p.42) → revenue depends on repeat orders from a customer list that has changed → the top ten customers were 51.18% of FY26 product sales, and the largest customer's share went from 38.84% in FY24 to 12.02% in FY26 (RHP pp.42
“Customers: the company has no long-term contracts and sells order by order (RHP p.42) → revenue depends on repeat orders from a customer list that has changed → the top ten customers were 51.18% of FY26 product sales, and the largest customer's share went from 38.84% in FY24 to 12.02% in FY26 (RHP p.45).”
- 138Risks, in plain wordsGroup entities: four promoter group entities are in the same trade (RHP p.30) → sales, purchases and exports have run through them, and the non-compete agreements date only from March and April 2026 (RHP p.195) → sales to the two main group entities were ₹23,614.40 lakh in FY24 and ₹2,649.80 lakh inp.30
“Group entities: four promoter group entities are in the same trade (RHP p.30) → sales, purchases and exports have run through them, and the non-compete agreements date only from March and April 2026 (RHP p.195) → sales to the two main group entities were ₹23,614.40 lakh in FY24 and ₹2,649.80 lakh in FY26 by our arithmetic (RHP p.25).”
- 139Risks, in plain wordsCotton prices: cotton arrives mainly from November to March and its price moves with weather and trade policy (RHP p.31) → the company has no hedging contracts on cotton or yarn prices (RHP p.49) → cotton, traded goods and stock change took 92.5% of FY26 revenue by our arithmetic (RHP p.66).p.31
“Cotton prices: cotton arrives mainly from November to March and its price moves with weather and trade policy (RHP p.31) → the company has no hedging contracts on cotton or yarn prices (RHP p.49) → cotton, traded goods and stock change took 92.5% of FY26 revenue by our arithmetic (RHP p.66).”
- 140Risks, in plain wordsMargin: FY26 profit after tax was ₹368.78 lakh on revenue of ₹40,801.01 lakh (RHP p.115) → a small change in the gap between cotton and yarn prices moves profit a long way → 1% of FY26 revenue is ₹408.01 lakh by our arithmetic, more than FY26 profit after tax.p.115
“Margin: FY26 profit after tax was ₹368.78 lakh on revenue of ₹40,801.01 lakh (RHP p.115) → a small change in the gap between cotton and yarn prices moves profit a long way → 1% of FY26 revenue is ₹408.01 lakh by our arithmetic, more than FY26 profit after tax.”
- 141Risks, in plain wordsSubsidy and incentives: other operating revenue of ₹403.31 lakh in FY26 was export incentives and a yarn VAT subsidy (RHP p.244) → it comes from government schemes, not from sales → it equals about 79% of FY26 profit before tax of ₹512.87 lakh by our arithmetic (RHP p.66).p.244
“Subsidy and incentives: other operating revenue of ₹403.31 lakh in FY26 was export incentives and a yarn VAT subsidy (RHP p.244) → it comes from government schemes, not from sales → it equals about 79% of FY26 profit before tax of ₹512.87 lakh by our arithmetic (RHP p.66).”
- 142Risks, in plain wordsCapacity: yarn capacity use fell from 81.38% in FY24 to 67.05% in FY26 (RHP p.29) → the spinning unit's fixed costs are spread over less output → the issue-funded machinery adds no capacity (RHP p.105).p.29
“Capacity: yarn capacity use fell from 81.38% in FY24 to 67.05% in FY26 (RHP p.29) → the spinning unit's fixed costs are spread over less output → the issue-funded machinery adds no capacity (RHP p.105).”
- 143Risks, in plain wordsRegulation: the plant's pollution control consent was valid to June 30, 2026 (RHP p.289) → the prospectus says a failure to obtain or renew approvals could affect operations (RHP p.34) → the renewal applied for on June 15, 2026 was still pending at the date of the prospectus (RHP p.290).p.289
“Regulation: the plant's pollution control consent was valid to June 30, 2026 (RHP p.289) → the prospectus says a failure to obtain or renew approvals could affect operations (RHP p.34) → the renewal applied for on June 15, 2026 was still pending at the date of the prospectus (RHP p.290).”
- 144Risks, in plain wordsExport obligation: duty-free imports under an advance authorisation carry an export obligation of ₹590.47 lakh FOB, valid to September 30, 2027 (RHP p.49) → if it is not met, the duty saved must be repaid with interest (RHP p.49) → the duty at stake is ₹303.97 lakh (RHP p.49).p.49
“Export obligation: duty-free imports under an advance authorisation carry an export obligation of ₹590.47 lakh FOB, valid to September 30, 2027 (RHP p.49) → if it is not met, the duty saved must be repaid with interest (RHP p.49) → the duty at stake is ₹303.97 lakh (RHP p.49).”
- 145Risks, in plain wordsFinancial: 82.09% of borrowings at April 30, 2026 were payable on demand (RHP p.261) → working capital lines can be recalled or repriced → cash credit was ₹4,135.08 lakh of borrowings of ₹5,842.87 lakh (RHP p.259).p.261
“Financial: 82.09% of borrowings at April 30, 2026 were payable on demand (RHP p.261) → working capital lines can be recalled or repriced → cash credit was ₹4,135.08 lakh of borrowings of ₹5,842.87 lakh (RHP p.259).”
- 146Risks, in plain wordsPromoters: promoter loans of ₹661.71 lakh at March 2026 have no repayment terms and can be recalled (RHP p.46) → a recall would fall on the bank lines → the Managing Director also faces reassessment on ₹2,628.25 lakh of income alleged to have escaped assessment, by our arithmetic on the three years p.46
“Promoters: promoter loans of ₹661.71 lakh at March 2026 have no repayment terms and can be recalled (RHP p.46) → a recall would fall on the bank lines → the Managing Director also faces reassessment on ₹2,628.25 lakh of income alleged to have escaped assessment, by our arithmetic on the three years (RHP p.275).”
- 147Risks, in plain wordsIssue-specific: the price, bid lot and general corporate purposes amount are blank (RHP p.305) → the reader cannot yet see what the issue raises → there is no monitoring agency (RHP p.111), and no machinery order has been placed (RHP p.103).p.305
“Issue-specific: the price, bid lot and general corporate purposes amount are blank (RHP p.305) → the reader cannot yet see what the issue raises → there is no monitoring agency (RHP p.111), and no machinery order has been placed (RHP p.103).”
- 148Litigation and regulatory mattersGST demand for April 2020 to March 2021, input credit from a supplier with cancelled registration | Company, as the LLP | ₹54.37 lakh | appeal filed January 28, 2026; demand stayed (RHP p.275)p.275
“GST demand for April 2020 to March 2021, input credit from a supplier with cancelled registration | Company, as the LLP | ₹54.37 lakh | appeal filed January 28, 2026; demand stayed (RHP p.275)”
- 149Litigation and regulatory mattersTDS shortfalls shown on the tax portal | Company and the LLP | ₹1.25 lakh | no recovery action yet (RHP p.274)p.274
“TDS shortfalls shown on the tax portal | Company and the LLP | ₹1.25 lakh | no recovery action yet (RHP p.274)”
- 150Litigation and regulatory mattersScrutiny assessment notice of June 20, 2026 | Company | not quantified | pending (RHP p.274)p.274
“Scrutiny assessment notice of June 20, 2026 | Company | not quantified | pending (RHP p.274)”
- 151Litigation and regulatory mattersReassessment of income for AY 2019-20 to 2021-22 | Nirav Bharatbhai Patel | ₹2,628.25 lakh of income; tax not stated | pending (RHP p.275)p.275
“Reassessment of income for AY 2019-20 to 2021-22 | Nirav Bharatbhai Patel | ₹2,628.25 lakh of income; tax not stated | pending (RHP p.275)”
- 152Litigation and regulatory mattersIncome tax demand and interest | Ranjanben Bharatbhai Patel | ₹1,780 | pending (RHP p.276)p.276
“Income tax demand and interest | Ranjanben Bharatbhai Patel | ₹1,780 | pending (RHP p.276)”
- 153Litigation and regulatory mattersFaceless assessment for AY 2025-26 | Vishnubhai Prahaladdas Patel | not quantified | pending (RHP p.276)p.276
“Faceless assessment for AY 2025-26 | Vishnubhai Prahaladdas Patel | not quantified | pending (RHP p.276)”
- 154Litigation and regulatory matters14 tax matters, mostly GST demands | Group entities | ₹916.62 lakh | appeals and replies pending (RHP p.39)p.39
“14 tax matters, mostly GST demands | Group entities | ₹916.62 lakh | appeals and replies pending (RHP p.39)”
- 155Litigation and regulatory mattersSix cheque-dishonour complaints filed as lender | Truepay Finance Private Limited | ₹138.22 lakh | pending (RHP p.39)p.39
“Six cheque-dishonour complaints filed as lender | Truepay Finance Private Limited | ₹138.22 lakh | pending (RHP p.39)”
- 156Litigation and regulatory mattersThere is no criminal case, regulatory action or disciplinary action against the company (RHP p.274) or against its directors and promoters (RHP p.275).p.274
“There is no criminal case, regulatory action or disciplinary action against the company (RHP p.274) or against its directors and promoters (RHP p.275).”
- 157Litigation and regulatory mattersThe largest group matter is a GST order of ₹6,01,03,394 against Ambica Cotseeds Limited for July 2017 to March 2019, under appeal (RHP p.279); several Ambica Cotseeds Limited and Vivekanand Industries orders allege input credit claimed on bills without goods being received (RHP p.278).p.279
“The largest group matter is a GST order of ₹6,01,03,394 against Ambica Cotseeds Limited for July 2017 to March 2019, under appeal (RHP p.279); several Ambica Cotseeds Limited and Vivekanand Industries orders allege input credit claimed on bills without goods being received (RHP p.278).”
- 158Litigation and regulatory mattersThe company's own summary table puts the five tax matters against directors and promoters at ₹0.02 lakh, with the amount for four not ascertained (RHP p.39).p.39
“The company's own summary table puts the five tax matters against directors and promoters at ₹0.02 lakh, with the amount for four not ascertained (RHP p.39).”
- 159Related-party transactionsRent to promoters and Avadh Cotton Industries was ₹7.20 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.71).p.71
“Rent to promoters and Avadh Cotton Industries was ₹7.20 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.71).”
- 160Related-party transactionsRelated customers paid in 2 to 5 days against 10 to 13 days for others, and the company paid related suppliers in 4 to 17 days against 3 to 4 days for others (RHP p.108), with some kapas from promoter relatives paid in 86 days (RHP p.107).p.108
“Related customers paid in 2 to 5 days against 10 to 13 days for others, and the company paid related suppliers in 4 to 17 days against 3 to 4 days for others (RHP p.108), with some kapas from promoter relatives paid in 86 days (RHP p.107).”
- 161Related-party transactionsThe company says the same stock is not traded several times within the group (RHP p.26).p.26
“The company says the same stock is not traded several times within the group (RHP p.26).”
- 162Related-party transactionsWhat appeared and disappeared: promoter loans appeared at the conversion in August 2024 and interest on them began in FY26, replacing interest on partners' capital (RHP p.261).p.261
“What appeared and disappeared: promoter loans appeared at the conversion in August 2024 and interest on them began in FY26, replacing interest on partners' capital (RHP p.261).”
- 163
“Purchases from related parties stopped in FY26 (RHP p.49).”
- 164
“in the period to March 2025 (RHP p.71).”
- 165Related-party transactionsThe plant and solar-land leases with promoters and Avadh Cotton Industries were signed in November 2024 (RHP p.182).p.182
“The plant and solar-land leases with promoters and Avadh Cotton Industries were signed in November 2024 (RHP p.182).”
- 166What the offer document does not sayHow much of the yarn and bales sold were made at Kadi and how much were traded is not disclosed; all product sales are labelled manufacturing (RHP p.172).p.172
“How much of the yarn and bales sold were made at Kadi and how much were traded is not disclosed; all product sales are labelled manufacturing (RHP p.172).”
- 167
“Customer and supplier names are not given (RHP p.45).”
- 168What the offer document does not sayThe floor price, cap price and bid lot are blank (RHP p.305); so are the issue amount and the general corporate purposes amount (RHP p.100), and the issue expenses (RHP p.110).p.305
“The floor price, cap price and bid lot are blank (RHP p.305); so are the issue amount and the general corporate purposes amount (RHP p.100), and the issue expenses (RHP p.110).”
- 169What the offer document does not sayThe tax at stake in the Managing Director's reassessment is not stated (RHP p.275).p.275
“The tax at stake in the Managing Director's reassessment is not stated (RHP p.275).”
- 170What the offer document does not sayThe industry chapter shows FY25 EBITDA as a negative ₹6,087.77 lakh (RHP p.159) against ₹1,458.92 lakh in the key indicators (RHP p.115).p.159
“The industry chapter shows FY25 EBITDA as a negative ₹6,087.77 lakh (RHP p.159) against ₹1,458.92 lakh in the key indicators (RHP p.115).”
- 171What the offer document does not sayFY25 profit before tax is ₹457.74 lakh on one page (RHP p.267) and ₹473.65 lakh on the next spread (RHP p.269).p.267
“FY25 profit before tax is ₹457.74 lakh on one page (RHP p.267) and ₹473.65 lakh on the next spread (RHP p.269).”
- 172What the offer document does not sayYarn capacity is given as 4,551 kilograms in one place (RHP p.28) and 4,551 tonnes in the certified table (RHP p.29).p.28
“Yarn capacity is given as 4,551 kilograms in one place (RHP p.28) and 4,551 tonnes in the certified table (RHP p.29).”
- 173What the offer document does not sayThe MD&A says the business is not seasonal (RHP p.271), while the risk factors describe seasonal cotton buying (RHP p.42).p.271
“The MD&A says the business is not seasonal (RHP p.271), while the risk factors describe seasonal cotton buying (RHP p.42).”
- 174What the offer document does not sayThe notes say provident fund and gratuity rules do not apply because work is done by contract labour (RHP p.256), while the company paid provident fund for 22 employees in FY26 (RHP p.38) and provides for gratuity (RHP p.250).p.256
“The notes say provident fund and gratuity rules do not apply because work is done by contract labour (RHP p.256), while the company paid provident fund for 22 employees in FY26 (RHP p.38) and provides for gratuity (RHP p.250).”
- 175
“Growth | EBITDA margin FY24 → FY26 | 4.1% → 3.7% | (RHP p.115)”
- 176
“Growth | PAT margin FY26 | 0.9% | (RHP p.115)”
- 177
“Issue | Fresh issue | 60,00,000 shares, price not stated | (RHP p.1)”
- 178
“Issue | Offer for sale | none | (RHP p.1)”
- 179
“Issue | Shares after the issue | 2,22,50,000 | (RHP p.63)”
- 180
“Concentration | Largest customer | 12.0% of FY26 product sales | (RHP p.45)”
- 181
“Concentration | Top ten customers | 51.2% of FY26 product sales | (RHP p.45)”
- 182
“Concentration | Largest supplier | 21.3% of FY26 purchases | (RHP p.48)”
- 183
“Balance sheet | Total borrowings March 2026 | ₹45.0 cr | (RHP p.258)”
- 184
“Balance sheet | Debt to equity FY26 | 1.6× | (RHP p.258)”
- 185
“Balance sheet | ROCE FY26 | 13.1% | (RHP p.115)”
- 186
“Worth reading | Related-party sales FY26 | ₹26.5 cr | (RHP p.72)”
- 187
“Worth reading | Contingent liabilities | ₹0.5 cr | (RHP p.69)”
- 188
“Worth reading | Working-capital cycle FY26 | 29 days | (RHP p.107)”
- 189
“Worth reading | Operating cash flow FY26 | ₹8.7 cr | (RHP p.117)”
- 190
“Before the IPO | Revenue FY24 → FY26 | ₹357.4 cr → ₹408.0 cr | (RHP p.66)”
- 191
“Before the IPO | PAT FY24 → FY26 | ₹3.4 cr → ₹3.7 cr | (RHP p.115)”
- 192
“Before the IPO | Receivable days FY24 → FY26 | 6 → 12 | (RHP p.109)”
- 193
“Before the IPO | Pre-IPO placement | none | (RHP p.1)”
- 194Key figuresBefore the IPO | Last allotment before the IPO | ₹64 a share, March 2026 | (RHP p.88)p.88
“Before the IPO | Last allotment before the IPO | ₹64 a share, March 2026 | (RHP p.88)”
- 195
“Before the IPO | Auditor change | none in the last three years | (RHP p.84)”
- 196
“Before the IPO | Converted to a public company | December 2024 | (RHP p.2)”
- 197
“Who is involved | Industry | Textiles and apparel | (RHP p.1)”
- 198
“Who is involved | Promoter | Nirav Bharatbhai Patel | (RHP p.1)”
- 199
“Who is involved | Promoter | Jasmin Vishnubhai Patel | (RHP p.1)”
- 200
“Who is involved | Promoter | Bharatbhai Prahaladbhai Patel | (RHP p.1)”
- 201
“Who is involved | Promoter | Vishnubhai Prahaladdas Patel | (RHP p.1)”
- 202
“Who is involved | Promoter | Gautam Bharatkumar Patel | (RHP p.1)”
- 203
“Who is involved | Promoter | B P Patel Family Trust | (RHP p.1)”
- 204
“Who is involved | Promoter | V P Patel Family Trust | (RHP p.1)”
- 205
“Who is involved | Promoter | Ranjanben Bharatbhai Patel | (RHP p.1)”
- 206
“Who is involved | Promoter | Kapilaben Vishnubhai Patel | (RHP p.1)”
Vivekanand Cotspin SME IPO: before the IPO
The record up to the issue and what changed in the company's capital and auditors, from the offer document.
- Revenue FY24 → FY26
- ₹357.4 cr → ₹408.0 cr
- PAT FY24 → FY26
- ₹3.4 cr → ₹3.7 cr
- Receivable days FY24 → FY26
- 6 → 12
- Pre-IPO placement
- none
- Last allotment before the IPO
- ₹64 a share, March 2026
- Auditor change
- none in the last three years
- Converted to a public company
- December 2024
Vivekanand Cotspin SME IPO: checks
Factual conditions, each with a fixed threshold, read from the key figures. A condition met is a fact to read up on in the study, not a verdict on the issue; meeting none is not a verdict either.
- Other income a large part of profit
Other income is 25.6% of profit before tax.
- Net debt over 3× EBITDA
Net debt is 3.0× EBITDA.
Vivekanand Cotspin SME IPO: questions answered
When was the Vivekanand Cotspin SME IPO open, and what were the price band and lot size?
Bidding ran Mon 21 Sept to Wed 23 Sept. The price band is ₹35 to ₹37 a share.
When will the Vivekanand Cotspin SME IPO list?
Under SEBI's T+3 timeline, shares list on the third working day after the issue closes; this issue closes on 23 Sept 2026. The exchange confirms the listing date in a notice once allotment is final.
How do I check the Vivekanand Cotspin SME IPO allotment status?
Allotment is finalised by the registrar usually the working day after the issue closes. Check it on the registrar's website with a PAN, application number or DP ID. Shares not allotted have their blocked amount released by the refund date.
The Vivekanand Cotspin SME IPO allotment status page, with the direct links
How many times was the Vivekanand Cotspin SME IPO subscribed?
1.73 times overall, as the exchange's bid book last showed.
What are Vivekanand Cotspin SME's financials?
Revenue went ₹357.4 cr to ₹408.0 cr (FY24 to FY26), 6.8% a year. Profit after tax went ₹3.4 cr to ₹3.7 cr (FY24 to FY26), 4.9% a year. All figures are from the offer document's restated statements.
How much of Vivekanand Cotspin SME's revenue comes from its largest customer?
The largest customer brought 12.0% of FY26 product sales, and the top ten customers 51.2%, as the offer document gives it. The study shows the years before and whether the customers are named.
Is the Vivekanand Cotspin SME IPO a fresh issue or an offer for sale?
A fresh issue of ₹0 crore, which goes to the company.
What is the Vivekanand Cotspin SME IPO GMP?
newboard does not publish a grey-market premium. Grey-market deals happen outside the stock exchanges, are not regulated, and leave no public record of who traded at what price. What is on record is the offer document, read on this page, and the exchanges' bid book.
Vivekanand Cotspin SME IPO: the next step, on Telegram
A message when there is news on its price band, bidding, allotment status, listing day and use-of-proceeds reports. Free, no account, leave in one tap. Send /stop to end it.
Not on this page yet: the peer table the issuer printed. Each is added when the pipeline extracts it from the offer document.