SMELiveOffer-document study

Everestims Technologies Limited IPO

IT services and software · DRHP 16 Sept 2025

Follow this IPOband, bidding, allotment and listing, on Telegram

Subscription window
29 Sept to 5 Oct
2026
DRHP filed
16 Sept 2025

A Bengaluru software company selling IT operations and service management software under the Infraon brand, on premises and as a subscription, is offering 45,93,600 new shares and 11,07,200 existing shares on BSE SME. Revenue rose from ₹45.2 crore in FY24 to ₹65.1 crore in FY26; profit after tax from ₹10.8 crore to ₹13.1 crore.

Everestims Technologies SME IPO: key figures

From the offer document; each figure is cited in the study below. Placings are among the 78 SME issues newboard has studied

Growth

Revenue CAGR FY24 to FY26
20.0%higher than 40% of studied issues
PAT CAGR FY24 to FY26
10.1%higher than 13% of studied issues
EBITDA margin FY24 → FY26
38.2% → 35.4%higher than 96% of studied issues

Issue

Fresh issue
45,93,600 shares, price not stated
Offer for sale
11,07,200 shares by 13 sellers
Promoter holding before → after
80.4% → 59.0%

Concentration

Largest customer
29.6% of FY26 revenuehigher than 75% of studied issues
Top five customers
76.1% of FY26 revenue
Top ten customers
88.8% of FY26 revenuehigher than 87% of studied issues
Largest supplier
60.9% of FY26 purchases

Balance sheet

Borrowings March 2026
none
ROCE FY26
36.2%higher than 64% of studied issues

Worth reading

Operating cash flow FY26
₹9.2 cr
Other income, share of profit before tax FY26
4.5%
Related-party transactions FY26
₹5.6 cr
Contingent liabilities
none
Cases against promoters
two direct-tax matters, ₹0.43 lakh
Development cost capitalised FY26
₹9.0 cr
Order book August 2026
₹39.1 cr

Share an interesting fact, not just a link

Pick one. The post writes itself, with the page the figure is on and the picture to go with it.

Send itWhatsAppXLinkedInTelegram Card
On this page (26 sections)
  1. Key figures
  2. The study
  3. At a glance
  4. The business, in plain words
  5. Where the money comes from
  6. The growth record
  7. What the growth is made of
  8. Earnings quality
  9. The balance sheet
  10. What the money is for
  11. Who is selling
  12. Promoters
  13. Who already owns it
  14. What changed just before the IPO
  15. Capacity and expansion
  16. Market size and industry structure
  17. Competitive position
  18. Peers the company named
  19. Valuation at the issue price
  20. Risks, in plain words
  21. Litigation and regulatory matters
  22. Related-party transactions
  23. What the offer document does not say
  24. Five questions for management
  25. Before the IPO
  26. Questions answered

Everestims Technologies Limited: what the offer document says

Published 4 Oct 2026 · 5,194 words · read from the RHP

01At a glance

EverestIMS Technologies IPO date, price band and lot size

What the company does: sells licences and subscriptions for software that monitors and manages a customer's IT systems, networks and service desk, under the brand Infraon and the platform name Infraon Infinity (RHP p.149, RHP p.152).

Who pays it: mostly large Indian customers reached through channel partners and distributors; the ten largest customers were 88.77% of FY26 revenue, and the prospectus does not name them (RHP p.163). India was 93.92% of FY26 revenue (RHP p.152).

Why it is raising money: ₹2,400.00 lakh for working capital and ₹565.56 lakh for servers, storage and laptops for an AI laboratory, with the rest for general corporate purposes (RHP p.98). The offer for sale of 11,07,200 shares goes to eight promoters, four employees and one other shareholder (RHP p.1).

How fast it has grown: revenue from ₹4,522.80 lakh in FY24 to ₹6,512.39 lakh in FY26, about 20.0% a year, and profit after tax from ₹1,083.08 lakh to ₹1,313.93 lakh, about 10.1% a year; profit fell 6.7% in FY26 (our arithmetic, RHP p.56).

The one thing to understand: the company is paid slowly. Trade receivables were 249 days of revenue in FY26 against 205 in FY24 (RHP p.112), and over FY24 to FY26 operating cash flow was ₹1,715.71 lakh against ₹3,804.71 lakh of profit (our arithmetic, RHP p.56, RHP p.57).

02The business, in plain words

What EverestIMS Technologies does

EverestIMS writes and sells software that watches over a company's IT estate: servers, network devices, applications, IT assets and the help desk that handles faults (RHP p.149, RHP p.152 to RHP p.158). For telecom operators it sells an operations support system, customised to each network (RHP p.157, RHP p.161).

An enterprise, government body or telecom operator needs to run its IT → pays for an Infraon licence per user, or a yearly cloud subscription → EverestIMS engineers build and maintain the platform in Bengaluru → EverestIMS is paid a one-time licence fee, customisation and maintenance fees, or a subscription (RHP p.160, RHP p.161).

The business began as a slump-sale purchase: on August 1, 2017 the company took over the software, networking and professional services business of DMX Technologies (India) Private Limited, with its employees and contracts, for ₹6,46,666 (RHP p.179). All eight promoters worked at DMX before moving across (RHP p.188 to RHP p.191). Most licences are sold through channel partners and distributors; the company does not sign licence agreements with its direct customers (RHP p.160).

A US subsidiary, Infraon Corp, acts as a local distributor abroad and owns the Infraon logo trademark in the United States (RHP p.180, RHP p.167). The company had 230 employees at March 2026, 107 of them in engineering (RHP p.164).

Earnings equation: Revenue = licences sold × fee per user + subscriptions + maintenance and services + hardware resold. In FY26 software licences were ₹5,005.57 lakh, services ₹981.42 lakh and hardware ₹525.40 lakh (our arithmetic, RHP p.150). The prospectus gives no user counts, licence counts or price per user.

03Where the money comes from

Revenue, ₹ lakhFY24FY25FY26
Software licences, India3,251.274,688.974,675.78
Software licences, export222.35108.98329.79
Services, India909.36708.38918.14
Services, export139.82147.9763.28
Hardware, India--525.40
Total4,522.805,654.306,512.39

Source: RHP p.150.

By state, Karnataka was 33.31% of FY26 revenue, Maharashtra 27.33% and Haryana 18.97%; Maharashtra rose from ₹334.98 lakh in FY25 to ₹1,779.84 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.151). Outside India, the UAE gave ₹304.68 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.152). Revenue is lumpy within the year: the April to June quarter of FY26 brought 0.57% of the year's revenue and January to March 56.48% (RHP p.35).

EverestIMS Technologies customers: how concentrated the revenue is

Share of revenueFY24FY25FY26
Largest customer40.49%28.31%29.55%
Top five74.25%73.80%76.07%
Top ten88.89%86.31%88.77%

Source: RHP p.163. Revenue depends on a few customers: in each of the three years ten customers gave more than 86% of it, and one customer gave between 28% and 41%. The largest supplier was 60.92% of FY26 purchases and the top five 94.74% (RHP p.163).

04The growth record

EverestIMS Technologies financials: revenue, profit and margins

₹ lakh, restated consolidatedFY24FY25FY26
Revenue from operations4,522.805,654.306,512.39
EBITDA, including other income1,743.922,264.422,333.90
EBITDA margin, on total income38.23%39.19%35.41%
Profit after tax1,083.081,407.701,313.93
PAT margin, on total income23.74%24.36%19.93%
Operating cash flow532.48263.07920.16

Source: RHP p.121, RHP p.56, RHP p.57.

Net worth was ₹3,222.47 lakh, ₹4,741.47 lakh and ₹6,058.87 lakh (our arithmetic, RHP p.55). There were no borrowings in any year (RHP p.121). Return on equity was 40.41%, 35.35% and 24.33%, and return on capital employed 56.56%, 48.63% and 36.15% (RHP p.121). Our arithmetic: revenue grew about 20.0% a year from FY24 to FY26, EBITDA about 15.7% and profit about 10.1%; EBITDA margin fell 282 basis points and PAT margin 381 basis points (RHP p.121, RHP p.56). Excluding other income, adjusted EBITDA was ₹2,254.82 lakh in FY26, a 34.62% margin on revenue (RHP p.121).

05What the growth is made of

Revenue rose ₹1,131.50 lakh in FY25, which the company puts down to more software licence sales (our arithmetic, RHP p.56, RHP p.286). It rose ₹858.09 lakh in FY26, which the company puts down to export licences, domestic services and domestic hardware (our arithmetic, RHP p.56, RHP p.285). Hardware sold with software was ₹525.40 lakh of FY26 revenue and did not exist before (RHP p.150); direct costs rose from ₹283.72 lakh to ₹862.44 lakh, which the company links to that bundling (RHP p.286). Domestic licence revenue was flat in FY26, at ₹4,675.78 lakh against ₹4,688.97 lakh (RHP p.150).

The prospectus does not disclose the number of customers, users or licences, or the price per user, so the increase cannot be separated into more customers, more users per customer and price.

06Earnings quality

IndicatorWhat the document shows
Operating cash flow against profit₹1,715.71 lakh against ₹3,804.71 lakh over FY24 to FY26, 0.45 times (our arithmetic, RHP p.56, RHP p.57)
Receivable days205, 220 and 249 (RHP p.112)
Receivables older than six months₹439.15 lakh, ₹1,329.87 lakh and ₹449.93 lakh (RHP p.262)
Payable days53, 16 and 68 (RHP p.112)
Working capital₹2,343.23 lakh, ₹2,364.04 lakh and ₹3,522.28 lakh, standalone (RHP p.111)
Other income₹79.08 lakh in FY26, 4.5% of profit before tax (our arithmetic, RHP p.56)
Development cost capitalised₹516.81 lakh, ₹689.23 lakh and ₹903.13 lakh added to in-house software (RHP p.259, RHP p.258, RHP p.257)
Auditor qualificationsnone in the underlying audit reports (RHP p.238)

Two items need explaining. First, receivables: at March 2026 the company was owed ₹5,196.20 lakh, 80% of the year's revenue, and a further ₹262.69 lakh was unbilled (our arithmetic, RHP p.55, RHP p.262). The company says contracts with large customers run on 200 to 250 day terms (RHP p.113).

Second, capitalisation. The company treats part of its engineers' pay as an asset once a product is judged marketable (RHP p.246). In FY26 it added ₹903.13 lakh to in-house software, equal to 41.0% of the employee cost left in the profit and loss account (our arithmetic, RHP p.257, RHP p.56). The company says employee cost fell 5.72% in FY26 mainly because more development cost was capitalised, and that amortisation rose for the same reason (RHP p.286). Amortisation of in-house software was ₹507.63 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.257).

07The balance sheet

At March 2026 the company had no fund-based borrowings and no unsecured loans; it holds a ₹2,200.00 lakh non-fund facility from HDFC Bank, unused at that date (RHP p.278). Cash and bank balances were ₹765.14 lakh, fixed deposits of more than a year ₹694.82 lakh and mutual funds ₹75.86 lakh (RHP p.55, RHP p.256). Other current liabilities of ₹1,600.27 lakh included ₹620.19 lakh of customer advances and ₹677.72 lakh of statutory dues payable (RHP p.255). The net block of in-house software was ₹1,430.96 lakh (RHP p.257). There were no contingent liabilities in any of the three years (RHP p.58).

After the issue, net worth would rise by the fresh issue proceeds less expenses; neither is stated, because the price is blank (RHP p.98). The prospectus sets the planned working capital for FY27 at ₹4,842.42 lakh, of which ₹2,400.00 lakh is to come from the issue (RHP p.112).

08What the money is for

EverestIMS Technologies IPO objects: what the money is for

Object₹ lakh
IT hardware for an AI Innovation and Experience Laboratory565.56
Working capital2,400.00
General corporate purposesnot stated ([●])

Source: RHP p.98, RHP p.99.

The laboratory is to sit in 1,500 sq. ft. of the existing Bengaluru office (RHP p.100). The ₹565.56 lakh covers 95 laptops at ₹114.95 lakh and servers, storage and switches at ₹450.61 lakh; a later quotation raised the servers to ₹731.95 lakh, and the extra ₹281.34 lakh is to come from internal accruals (RHP p.100, RHP p.110). No order has been placed (RHP p.111). All of it is scheduled for FY27 (RHP p.98). General corporate purposes are capped at 15% of the amount raised or ₹1,000 lakh, whichever is lower (RHP p.99).

Into the business: up to 45,93,600 new shares, amount not stated at this stage (RHP p.1). To selling shareholders: up to 11,07,200 existing shares, amount not stated (RHP p.1).

09Who is selling

EverestIMS Technologies IPO offer for sale: who is selling

ShareholderRelationshipShares beforeShares offered% offered
Satish Kumar Vijayaragavanpromoter22,02,0001,10,4005.0%
Arun Prasath Ramadosspromoter16,42,5701,43,2008.7%
Deepak Kumar Shenbagarajanpromoter16,42,5701,31,2008.0%
Five other promoters, eachpromoter16,42,5701,10,4006.7%
Four employeesemployee13,86,0001,39,20010.0%
Samaresh Mandalpublic2,64,00031,20011.8%

Source: RHP p.97, RHP p.98; percentages are our arithmetic. The five other promoters are Srikanth Audina, Sudhakar Aruchamy, Ramesh Pratap Tiwari, Ganesh Kumar Nagaiah and Deepak Gupta; the employees are Prakash Bhat (33,600), Abhirup Sarkar (43,200), Praveen Kumar Sinha (38,400) and Ramya Sellamuthu (24,000) (RHP p.97). The promoters' average cost is ₹0.29 a share and the other sellers' ₹1.52 (RHP p.1).

10Promoters

There are eight promoters, all executive directors: Satish Kumar Vijayaragavan (managing director), Sudhakar Aruchamy (chairman), Arun Prasath Ramadoss, Ramesh Pratap Tiwari, Deepak Kumar Shenbagarajan, Srikanth Audina, Ganesh Kumar Nagaiah and Deepak Gupta (RHP p.62, RHP p.226). Satish Kumar Vijayaragavan and Srikanth Audina subscribed at incorporation; Ramesh Pratap Tiwari and Arun Prasath Ramadoss became promoters by March 31, 2023, and the other four were recognised as promoters by a board resolution of June 1, 2023 (RHP p.229). Ramesh Pratap Tiwari is a director of Vedanshi Infotech Private Limited, the group company (RHP p.183). None of the executive directors has managed a listed company before (RHP p.34).

Promoter economics: the promoters' average cost is ₹0.29 a share (RHP p.91). Their shares came from a rights issue at ₹1 in 2017, a 3:1 bonus in April 2022, a consolidation of ₹1 shares into ₹10 shares in October 2024 and an 8:1 bonus in November 2024 (RHP p.88 to RHP p.91). On September 16, 2026 the promoters transferred 7,00,010 shares, and four employees and one other shareholder 1,50,000, to Kedia Securities Private Limited at ₹68 each (our arithmetic, RHP p.125, RHP p.126).

Promoter pay: the eight drew ₹507.80 lakh in FY26, up from ₹457.17 lakh in FY25 (our arithmetic, RHP p.59, RHP p.60). In FY24 only three of them were directors and the related-party schedule shows ₹180.77 lakh for those three (our arithmetic, RHP p.59, RHP p.60). The chairman's pay was set at ₹91.52 lakh a year from April 1, 2025 (RHP p.193). No promoter shares are pledged for the minimum contribution (RHP p.93).

11Who already owns it

EverestIMS Technologies promoter holding before and after the IPO

Before the issue there are 1,70,44,578 shares held by 69 shareholders (RHP p.52, RHP p.84). The eight promoters hold 1,36,99,990 shares, 80.38% (RHP p.87). Kedia Securities Private Limited holds 8,50,010, 4.99%, all acquired at ₹68 on September 16, 2026 (RHP p.85, RHP p.125). Six other individuals, among them employees, hold between 1.16% and 2.71% each (RHP p.85). The prospectus says nothing about who Kedia Securities Private Limited is.

If the whole offer is allotted there will be 2,16,38,178 shares; the promoters would hold 1,27,63,190, or 59.0%, and Kedia Securities 3.9% (our arithmetic, RHP p.52, RHP p.87). The offer is 26.35% of the post-issue capital (RHP p.2).

12What changed just before the IPO

  • April 2022: a 3:1 bonus issue on ₹1 shares (RHP p.74).
  • June 2023: four more directors recognised as promoters (RHP p.229).
  • July to September 2024: conversion to a public company, approved on July 12, 2024 and certified on September 10, 2024 (RHP p.2).
  • September and October 2024: ESOP allotments of 6,18,420 shares at ₹17.94, of which the holder paid ₹1 (RHP p.75).
  • October 2024: ₹1 shares consolidated into ₹10 shares; S H & Co resigned as auditor and CGSS & Associates LLP was appointed (RHP p.75, RHP p.69).
  • November 2024: an 8:1 bonus issue, 1,51,50,736 shares (RHP p.75).
  • October to December 2024: five promoters became whole-time directors and pay for all eight rose (RHP p.59, RHP p.60).
  • FY26: hardware resale began, ₹525.40 lakh (RHP p.150).
  • March 18, 2026: the offer was cut from 60,06,000 shares to 57,00,800 (RHP p.53).
  • September 15, 2026: a five-year non-compete with Vedanshi Infotech Private Limited (RHP p.34).
  • September 16, 2026: 8,50,010 existing shares sold to Kedia Securities Private Limited at ₹68 (RHP p.125, RHP p.126).

13Capacity and expansion

The company does not manufacture; the prospectus says capacity and utilisation do not apply (RHP p.164). It works from leased and licensed offices in Bengaluru, Navi Mumbai and Gurgaon and owns no premises (RHP p.29, RHP p.167, RHP p.168). The order book was ₹3,912.19 lakh at August 31, 2026 (RHP p.162). The issue adds servers and GPUs for an AI laboratory (RHP p.100, RHP p.101); the prospectus does not say how much revenue the laboratory is meant to support.

14Market size and industry structure

EverestIMS Technologies industry: market size and growth

As claimed: the IT operations and service management market in India was US$ 1,011.55 million in 2023, according to an industry report by The Insight Partners dated August 20, 2025 (RHP p.144, RHP p.145, RHP p.410). The report is listed among the documents for inspection and is said to be on the company's website (RHP p.410); the prospectus does not say whether the company paid for it. The chapter states that neither the company nor anyone connected with the offer has verified the data (RHP p.132).

The part that is addressable: IT operations and service management software for Indian enterprises, government bodies and telecom operators, plus a small export business (RHP p.161, RHP p.152). The prospectus does not size that part separately.

What the company is today: ₹6,120.18 lakh of FY26 revenue from India (RHP p.152). The 2023 India figure is in US dollars for a year that does not match the company's financial year, so the share cannot be worked out without an exchange rate the prospectus does not give for this purpose.

Size over time: according to the report, the India market was US$ 809.52 million in 2021 and US$ 903.53 million in 2022, before the US$ 1,011.55 million of 2023 (RHP p.144). That is about 11.8% a year from 2021 to 2023 (our arithmetic, RHP p.144). The report projects US$ 2,665.58 million by 2031, a CAGR of 12.9% from 2023 to 2031 (RHP p.144); that is the report's projection, not newboard's. Most of the chapter is about the global market, and its text states no global total (RHP p.132 to RHP p.143).

Segments: the report divides the market by type (solution and services), application, industry, deployment (on-premises and cloud) and enterprise size (large enterprises and SMEs) (RHP p.132). The company offers both on-premises licences and cloud subscriptions (RHP p.149), so it falls in both deployment segments. In the report's India table by industry, IT and telecom was the largest line in 2023 at US$ 300.02 million and government was US$ 69.70 million; the report projects 15.5% and 9.5% a year for them from 2023 to 2031 (RHP p.145). The prospectus splits the company's revenue by product, state and country (RHP p.150 to RHP p.152), not by these industries.

What drives demand: the chapter names data-driven decision-making and the addition of AI to these tools (RHP p.132); government digitisation programmes, remote working, and cloud and AI adoption (RHP p.133); and a move to unified platforms (RHP p.134). For India it names the Bring Your Own Device culture, with 75% of Indian workers said to be highly interested in such policies, and the generative AI centres HCL Tech and IBM launched in July 2024 (RHP p.144).

Structure: the chapter lists Ardent IT Private Limited, Alnafitha IT, PROV International Inc., BMC Software, Happiest Minds, IBM, Oracle, Microsoft, Fujitsu and NTT DATA among the major global players, and says many other companies operate in the market (RHP p.132). It gives no market shares, no split between organised and unorganised players and nothing on barriers to entry. It notes that many organisations run separate tools for monitoring, incidents, service requests and asset tracking (RHP p.146). The company itself says it competes with organised and unorganised players (RHP p.164).

Inputs and trade: the chapter does not discuss raw materials, imports or exports. The one input it discusses is skilled staff: it cites a survey in which the share of US HR professionals reporting skills gaps rose from 55% in 2021 to 69% in 2023, and says competition for IT talent has raised labour costs and turnover (RHP p.146). India was 93.92% of the company's FY26 revenue (RHP p.152).

Rules: the chapter names rules that IT operations vendors must meet: GDPR, the CCPA, HIPAA, SOX and ISO 27001 (RHP p.147), and data localisation laws such as India's DPDP Act (RHP p.148). It does not list any licence or approval the company itself needs.

What the chapter says can go wrong: it lists three challenges: managing hybrid and multi-cloud systems, skill gaps and talent shortage, and the lack of a unified framework across tools (RHP p.145 to RHP p.147). It lists three threats: cyber attacks, citing a survey in which 72% of respondents saw cyber threats rise in 2024; tighter regulation, where failure to comply can bring financial penalties (RHP p.147); and data sovereignty rules that can restrict moving monitoring data across borders (RHP p.148).

15Competitive position

EverestIMS Technologies competitors

The company says it competes with organised and unorganised players, and that reliability and price decide most sales (RHP p.164). Its risk factors name global system integrators and mid-sized and local firms (RHP p.39). It holds two Indian trademarks and a software copyright registration still in the old private company name (RHP p.166, RHP p.167). It says it uses one integrated platform where customers would otherwise need several tools, and sells mainly through channel partners, some without formal agreements (RHP p.161, RHP p.27). The prospectus does not give market shares, win rates or customer retention.

16Peers the company named

EverestIMS Technologies listed peers

Peers named in the offer document: Newgen Software Technologies Limited (RHP p.120).

CompanyRevenue FY26, ₹ lakhPAT marginRoEP/E
EverestIMS Technologies6,512.3919.93%24.33%not stated
Newgen Software Technologies1,57,439.5619.09%18.25%23.45

Source: RHP p.123, RHP p.120; the peer P/E is at the BSE closing price of September 11, 2026 (RHP p.119). Newgen's revenue is about 24 times EverestIMS's (our arithmetic, RHP p.123). The prospectus itself says the peer is not strictly comparable given the company's business and size (RHP p.120).

17Valuation at the issue price

EverestIMS Technologies IPO valuation and P/E

The prospectus does not state the price band. The price band and the minimum bid lot are to be advertised in newspapers at least two working days before the issue opens (RHP p.2), and the P/E rows of the prospectus's own table are blank (RHP p.118, RHP p.119). Without a price there is no market capitalisation, P/E, price to book or enterprise value to calculate.

What the arithmetic can say now: after the issue there would be 2,16,38,178 shares (our arithmetic, RHP p.52, RHP p.73). FY26 profit of ₹1,313.93 lakh is ₹6.07 a share on that count, against the prospectus's FY26 EPS of ₹7.71 on the pre-issue count (our arithmetic, RHP p.56, RHP p.118). Net asset value was ₹35.55 a share at March 2026 (RHP p.119). The one peer the prospectus names traded at 23.45 times FY26 earnings on September 11, 2026 (RHP p.119). The last transfer of shares before the offer was at ₹68 on September 16, 2026 (RHP p.125).

18Risks, in plain words

EverestIMS Technologies IPO risks

Customers: one customer was 29.55% of FY26 revenue and ten were 88.77% (RHP p.163) → losing one large account moves the whole year → none of them is named.

Collections: receivable days were 249 in FY26 (RHP p.112) → cash arrives long after profit is booked → operating cash flow was 0.45 times profit over three years (our arithmetic, RHP p.56, RHP p.57).

Timing: 56.48% of FY26 revenue came in the last quarter and 0.57% in the first (RHP p.35) → one delayed contract shifts a year's result → the company says revenue follows project milestones and customer acceptance (RHP p.35).

Capitalised development: ₹903.13 lakh of development cost was capitalised in FY26 (RHP p.257) → profit depends on how much is capitalised and how fast it is amortised → amortisation was ₹507.63 lakh (RHP p.257).

Suppliers: the largest supplier was 60.92% of FY26 purchases (RHP p.163) → hardware and third-party supply sit with one vendor → purchases were ₹862.44 lakh (RHP p.56).

Compliance: statutory forms were filed 1 to 69 days late, four allotment forms were defective, and TDS of ₹17.02 lakh was paid 22 days late in FY24 (RHP p.32, RHP p.33) → the Registrar may impose penalties → the prospectus does not quantify them.

Promoters and group: Vedanshi Infotech Private Limited may do similar business (RHP p.33) → conflicts of interest → a non-compete was signed only on September 15, 2026 (RHP p.34). The Infraon logo is owned by the US subsidiary (RHP p.37).

Issue-specific: no monitoring agency, the objects are not appraised, and general corporate purposes and issue expenses are blank (RHP p.44, RHP p.116, RHP p.114).

19Litigation and regulatory matters

Cases against EverestIMS Technologies and its promoters

MatterPartyAmountStatus
Direct tax, two casesPromoters₹0.43 lakhoutstanding (RHP p.294)
Direct tax, one caseDirector other than a promoter₹0.07 lakhoutstanding (RHP p.293)
Criminal, regulatory, material civilCompany, promoters, subsidiary, group companynilnone outstanding (RHP p.290 to RHP p.293)

There are no tax proceedings against the company (RHP p.293). One creditor, an MSME, was owed ₹619.47 lakh at March 2026 and is the only material creditor (RHP p.294). The late filings and defective forms under section 22 may still attract penalties (RHP p.32).

21What the offer document does not say

The price band, the bid lot, the issue expenses and the amount for general corporate purposes are left blank. The names of the customers, which are 88.77% of revenue, and of the supplier that is 60.92% of purchases are not given. The number of customers, users and licences, renewal rates and revenue per customer are not disclosed. How much of the ₹903.13 lakh capitalised in FY26 was employee cost is not split out. Who Kedia Securities Private Limited is, and why it bought at ₹68, is not stated. The other income note adds to ₹79.08 lakh but prints a total of ₹73.75 lakh (RHP p.263).

22Five questions for management

  1. How many paying customers and licensed users did the company have at the end of FY24, FY25 and FY26?
  2. How much of the ₹5,196.20 lakh of receivables at March 2026 had been collected by August 31, 2026, and from how many customers?
  3. How much of FY26 employee cost was capitalised into in-house software, and over how many years is it amortised?
  4. What did the company earn on the ₹525.40 lakh of hardware sold in FY26, and will hardware continue?
  5. What share of the ₹3,912.19 lakh order book is from the ten largest customers?

1Sources and cited facts

This study was read from 1 document the company filed. The 144 figures it cites are listed under the document each came from, with the page and the sentence as printed.

Show all 144 cited facts, with the page and the sentence as printed
EVERESTIMS TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED RHPrhp · filed 2025-09-16144 facts
  1. 1
    At a glanceWho pays it: mostly large Indian customers reached through channel partners and distributors; the ten largest customers were 88.77% of FY26 revenue, and the prospectus does not name them (RHP p.163).p.163

    “Who pays it: mostly large Indian customers reached through channel partners and distributors; the ten largest customers were 88.77% of FY26 revenue, and the prospectus does not name them (RHP p.163).”

  2. 2
    At a glanceIndia was 93.92% of FY26 revenue (RHP p.152).p.152

    “India was 93.92% of FY26 revenue (RHP p.152).”

  3. 3
    At a glanceWhy it is raising money: ₹2,400.00 lakh for working capital and ₹565.56 lakh for servers, storage and laptops for an AI laboratory, with the rest for general corporate purposes (RHP p.98).p.98

    “Why it is raising money: ₹2,400.00 lakh for working capital and ₹565.56 lakh for servers, storage and laptops for an AI laboratory, with the rest for general corporate purposes (RHP p.98).”

  4. 4
    At a glanceThe offer for sale of 11,07,200 shares goes to eight promoters, four employees and one other shareholder (RHP p.1).p.1

    “The offer for sale of 11,07,200 shares goes to eight promoters, four employees and one other shareholder (RHP p.1).”

  5. 5
    At a glanceTrade receivables were 249 days of revenue in FY26 against 205 in FY24 (RHP p.112), and over FY24 to FY26 operating cash flow was ₹1,715.71 lakh against ₹3,804.71 lakh of profit (our arithmetic, RHP p.56, RHP p.57).p.112

    “Trade receivables were 249 days of revenue in FY26 against 205 in FY24 (RHP p.112), and over FY24 to FY26 operating cash flow was ₹1,715.71 lakh against ₹3,804.71 lakh of profit (our arithmetic, RHP p.56, RHP p.57).”

  6. 6
    The business, in plain wordsThe business began as a slump-sale purchase: on August 1, 2017 the company took over the software, networking and professional services business of DMX Technologies (India) Private Limited, with its employees and contracts, for ₹6,46,666 (RHP p.179).p.179

    “The business began as a slump-sale purchase: on August 1, 2017 the company took over the software, networking and professional services business of DMX Technologies (India) Private Limited, with its employees and contracts, for ₹6,46,666 (RHP p.179).”

  7. 7
    The business, in plain wordsMost licences are sold through channel partners and distributors; the company does not sign licence agreements with its direct customers (RHP p.160).p.160

    “Most licences are sold through channel partners and distributors; the company does not sign licence agreements with its direct customers (RHP p.160).”

  8. 8
    The business, in plain wordsThe company had 230 employees at March 2026, 107 of them in engineering (RHP p.164).p.164

    “The company had 230 employees at March 2026, 107 of them in engineering (RHP p.164).”

  9. 9
    Where the money comes fromBy state, Karnataka was 33.31% of FY26 revenue, Maharashtra 27.33% and Haryana 18.97%; Maharashtra rose from ₹334.98 lakh in FY25 to ₹1,779.84 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.151).p.151

    “By state, Karnataka was 33.31% of FY26 revenue, Maharashtra 27.33% and Haryana 18.97%; Maharashtra rose from ₹334.98 lakh in FY25 to ₹1,779.84 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.151).”

  10. 10
    Where the money comes fromOutside India, the UAE gave ₹304.68 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.152).p.152

    “Outside India, the UAE gave ₹304.68 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.152).”

  11. 11
    Where the money comes fromRevenue is lumpy within the year: the April to June quarter of FY26 brought 0.57% of the year's revenue and January to March 56.48% (RHP p.35).p.35

    “Revenue is lumpy within the year: the April to June quarter of FY26 brought 0.57% of the year's revenue and January to March 56.48% (RHP p.35).”

  12. 12
    Where the money comes fromThe largest supplier was 60.92% of FY26 purchases and the top five 94.74% (RHP p.163).p.163

    “The largest supplier was 60.92% of FY26 purchases and the top five 94.74% (RHP p.163).”

  13. 13
    The growth recordThere were no borrowings in any year (RHP p.121).p.121

    “There were no borrowings in any year (RHP p.121).”

  14. 14
    The growth recordReturn on equity was 40.41%, 35.35% and 24.33%, and return on capital employed 56.56%, 48.63% and 36.15% (RHP p.121).p.121

    “Return on equity was 40.41%, 35.35% and 24.33%, and return on capital employed 56.56%, 48.63% and 36.15% (RHP p.121).”

  15. 15
    The growth recordExcluding other income, adjusted EBITDA was ₹2,254.82 lakh in FY26, a 34.62% margin on revenue (RHP p.121).p.121

    “Excluding other income, adjusted EBITDA was ₹2,254.82 lakh in FY26, a 34.62% margin on revenue (RHP p.121).”

  16. 16
    What the growth is made ofHardware sold with software was ₹525.40 lakh of FY26 revenue and did not exist before (RHP p.150); direct costs rose from ₹283.72 lakh to ₹862.44 lakh, which the company links to that bundling (RHP p.286).p.150

    “Hardware sold with software was ₹525.40 lakh of FY26 revenue and did not exist before (RHP p.150); direct costs rose from ₹283.72 lakh to ₹862.44 lakh, which the company links to that bundling (RHP p.286).”

  17. 17
    What the growth is made ofDomestic licence revenue was flat in FY26, at ₹4,675.78 lakh against ₹4,688.97 lakh (RHP p.150).p.150

    “Domestic licence revenue was flat in FY26, at ₹4,675.78 lakh against ₹4,688.97 lakh (RHP p.150).”

  18. 18
    Earnings qualityReceivable days | 205, 220 and 249 (RHP p.112)p.112

    “Receivable days | 205, 220 and 249 (RHP p.112)”

  19. 19
    Earnings qualityReceivables older than six months | ₹439.15 lakh, ₹1,329.87 lakh and ₹449.93 lakh (RHP p.262)p.262

    “Receivables older than six months | ₹439.15 lakh, ₹1,329.87 lakh and ₹449.93 lakh (RHP p.262)”

  20. 20
    Earnings qualityPayable days | 53, 16 and 68 (RHP p.112)p.112

    “Payable days | 53, 16 and 68 (RHP p.112)”

  21. 21
    Earnings qualityWorking capital | ₹2,343.23 lakh, ₹2,364.04 lakh and ₹3,522.28 lakh, standalone (RHP p.111)p.111

    “Working capital | ₹2,343.23 lakh, ₹2,364.04 lakh and ₹3,522.28 lakh, standalone (RHP p.111)”

  22. 22
    Earnings qualityAuditor qualifications | none in the underlying audit reports (RHP p.238)p.238

    “Auditor qualifications | none in the underlying audit reports (RHP p.238)”

  23. 23
    Earnings qualityThe company says contracts with large customers run on 200 to 250 day terms (RHP p.113).p.113

    “The company says contracts with large customers run on 200 to 250 day terms (RHP p.113).”

  24. 24
    Earnings qualityThe company treats part of its engineers' pay as an asset once a product is judged marketable (RHP p.246).p.246

    “The company treats part of its engineers' pay as an asset once a product is judged marketable (RHP p.246).”

  25. 25
    Earnings qualityThe company says employee cost fell 5.72% in FY26 mainly because more development cost was capitalised, and that amortisation rose for the same reason (RHP p.286).p.286

    “The company says employee cost fell 5.72% in FY26 mainly because more development cost was capitalised, and that amortisation rose for the same reason (RHP p.286).”

  26. 26
    Earnings qualityAmortisation of in-house software was ₹507.63 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.257).p.257

    “Amortisation of in-house software was ₹507.63 lakh in FY26 (RHP p.257).”

  27. 27
    The balance sheetAt March 2026 the company had no fund-based borrowings and no unsecured loans; it holds a ₹2,200.00 lakh non-fund facility from HDFC Bank, unused at that date (RHP p.278).p.278

    “At March 2026 the company had no fund-based borrowings and no unsecured loans; it holds a ₹2,200.00 lakh non-fund facility from HDFC Bank, unused at that date (RHP p.278).”

  28. 28
    The balance sheetOther current liabilities of ₹1,600.27 lakh included ₹620.19 lakh of customer advances and ₹677.72 lakh of statutory dues payable (RHP p.255).p.255

    “Other current liabilities of ₹1,600.27 lakh included ₹620.19 lakh of customer advances and ₹677.72 lakh of statutory dues payable (RHP p.255).”

  29. 29
    The balance sheetThe net block of in-house software was ₹1,430.96 lakh (RHP p.257).p.257

    “The net block of in-house software was ₹1,430.96 lakh (RHP p.257).”

  30. 30
    The balance sheetThere were no contingent liabilities in any of the three years (RHP p.58).p.58

    “There were no contingent liabilities in any of the three years (RHP p.58).”

  31. 31
    The balance sheetAfter the issue, net worth would rise by the fresh issue proceeds less expenses; neither is stated, because the price is blank (RHP p.98).p.98

    “After the issue, net worth would rise by the fresh issue proceeds less expenses; neither is stated, because the price is blank (RHP p.98).”

  32. 32
    The balance sheetThe prospectus sets the planned working capital for FY27 at ₹4,842.42 lakh, of which ₹2,400.00 lakh is to come from the issue (RHP p.112).p.112

    “The prospectus sets the planned working capital for FY27 at ₹4,842.42 lakh, of which ₹2,400.00 lakh is to come from the issue (RHP p.112).”

  33. 33
    What the money is forof the existing Bengaluru office (RHP p.100).p.100

    “of the existing Bengaluru office (RHP p.100).”

  34. 34
    What the money is forNo order has been placed (RHP p.111).p.111

    “No order has been placed (RHP p.111).”

  35. 35
    What the money is forAll of it is scheduled for FY27 (RHP p.98).p.98

    “All of it is scheduled for FY27 (RHP p.98).”

  36. 36
    What the money is forGeneral corporate purposes are capped at 15% of the amount raised or ₹1,000 lakh, whichever is lower (RHP p.99).p.99

    “General corporate purposes are capped at 15% of the amount raised or ₹1,000 lakh, whichever is lower (RHP p.99).”

  37. 37
    What the money is for> Into the business: up to 45,93,600 new shares, amount not stated at this stage (RHP p.1).p.1

    “> Into the business: up to 45,93,600 new shares, amount not stated at this stage (RHP p.1).”

  38. 38
    What the money is for> To selling shareholders: up to 11,07,200 existing shares, amount not stated (RHP p.1).p.1

    “> To selling shareholders: up to 11,07,200 existing shares, amount not stated (RHP p.1).”

  39. 39
    Who is sellingThe five other promoters are Srikanth Audina, Sudhakar Aruchamy, Ramesh Pratap Tiwari, Ganesh Kumar Nagaiah and Deepak Gupta; the employees are Prakash Bhat (33,600), Abhirup Sarkar (43,200), Praveen Kumar Sinha (38,400) and Ramya Sellamuthu (24,000) (RHP p.97).p.97

    “The five other promoters are Srikanth Audina, Sudhakar Aruchamy, Ramesh Pratap Tiwari, Ganesh Kumar Nagaiah and Deepak Gupta; the employees are Prakash Bhat (33,600), Abhirup Sarkar (43,200), Praveen Kumar Sinha (38,400) and Ramya Sellamuthu (24,000) (RHP p.97).”

  40. 40
    Who is sellingThe promoters' average cost is ₹0.29 a share and the other sellers' ₹1.52 (RHP p.1).p.1

    “The promoters' average cost is ₹0.29 a share and the other sellers' ₹1.52 (RHP p.1).”

  41. 41
    PromotersSatish Kumar Vijayaragavan and Srikanth Audina subscribed at incorporation; Ramesh Pratap Tiwari and Arun Prasath Ramadoss became promoters by March 31, 2023, and the other four were recognised as promoters by a board resolution of June 1, 2023 (RHP p.229).p.229

    “Satish Kumar Vijayaragavan and Srikanth Audina subscribed at incorporation; Ramesh Pratap Tiwari and Arun Prasath Ramadoss became promoters by March 31, 2023, and the other four were recognised as promoters by a board resolution of June 1, 2023 (RHP p.229).”

  42. 42
    PromotersRamesh Pratap Tiwari is a director of Vedanshi Infotech Private Limited, the group company (RHP p.183).p.183

    “Ramesh Pratap Tiwari is a director of Vedanshi Infotech Private Limited, the group company (RHP p.183).”

  43. 43
    PromotersNone of the executive directors has managed a listed company before (RHP p.34).p.34

    “None of the executive directors has managed a listed company before (RHP p.34).”

  44. 44
    PromotersPromoter economics: the promoters' average cost is ₹0.29 a share (RHP p.91).p.91

    “Promoter economics: the promoters' average cost is ₹0.29 a share (RHP p.91).”

  45. 45
    PromotersThe chairman's pay was set at ₹91.52 lakh a year from April 1, 2025 (RHP p.193).p.193

    “The chairman's pay was set at ₹91.52 lakh a year from April 1, 2025 (RHP p.193).”

  46. 46
    PromotersNo promoter shares are pledged for the minimum contribution (RHP p.93).p.93

    “No promoter shares are pledged for the minimum contribution (RHP p.93).”

  47. 47
    Who already owns itThe eight promoters hold 1,36,99,990 shares, 80.38% (RHP p.87).p.87

    “The eight promoters hold 1,36,99,990 shares, 80.38% (RHP p.87).”

  48. 48
    Who already owns itSix other individuals, among them employees, hold between 1.16% and 2.71% each (RHP p.85).p.85

    “Six other individuals, among them employees, hold between 1.16% and 2.71% each (RHP p.85).”

  49. 49
    Who already owns itThe offer is 26.35% of the post-issue capital (RHP p.2).p.2

    “The offer is 26.35% of the post-issue capital (RHP p.2).”

  50. 50
    What changed just before the IPOApril 2022: a 3:1 bonus issue on ₹1 shares (RHP p.74).p.74

    “April 2022: a 3:1 bonus issue on ₹1 shares (RHP p.74).”

  51. 51
    What changed just before the IPOJune 2023: four more directors recognised as promoters (RHP p.229).p.229

    “June 2023: four more directors recognised as promoters (RHP p.229).”

  52. 52
    What changed just before the IPOJuly to September 2024: conversion to a public company, approved on July 12, 2024 and certified on September 10, 2024 (RHP p.2).p.2

    “July to September 2024: conversion to a public company, approved on July 12, 2024 and certified on September 10, 2024 (RHP p.2).”

  53. 53
    What changed just before the IPOSeptember and October 2024: ESOP allotments of 6,18,420 shares at ₹17.94, of which the holder paid ₹1 (RHP p.75).p.75

    “September and October 2024: ESOP allotments of 6,18,420 shares at ₹17.94, of which the holder paid ₹1 (RHP p.75).”

  54. 54
    What changed just before the IPONovember 2024: an 8:1 bonus issue, 1,51,50,736 shares (RHP p.75).p.75

    “November 2024: an 8:1 bonus issue, 1,51,50,736 shares (RHP p.75).”

  55. 55
    What changed just before the IPOFY26: hardware resale began, ₹525.40 lakh (RHP p.150).p.150

    “FY26: hardware resale began, ₹525.40 lakh (RHP p.150).”

  56. 56
    What changed just before the IPOMarch 18, 2026: the offer was cut from 60,06,000 shares to 57,00,800 (RHP p.53).p.53

    “March 18, 2026: the offer was cut from 60,06,000 shares to 57,00,800 (RHP p.53).”

  57. 57
    What changed just before the IPOSeptember 15, 2026: a five-year non-compete with Vedanshi Infotech Private Limited (RHP p.34).p.34

    “September 15, 2026: a five-year non-compete with Vedanshi Infotech Private Limited (RHP p.34).”

  58. 58
    Capacity and expansionThe company does not manufacture; the prospectus says capacity and utilisation do not apply (RHP p.164).p.164

    “The company does not manufacture; the prospectus says capacity and utilisation do not apply (RHP p.164).”

  59. 59
    Capacity and expansionThe order book was ₹3,912.19 lakh at August 31, 2026 (RHP p.162).p.162

    “The order book was ₹3,912.19 lakh at August 31, 2026 (RHP p.162).”

  60. 60
    Market size and industry structureThe report is listed among the documents for inspection and is said to be on the company's website (RHP p.410); the prospectus does not say whether the company paid for it.p.410

    “The report is listed among the documents for inspection and is said to be on the company's website (RHP p.410); the prospectus does not say whether the company paid for it.”

  61. 61
    Market size and industry structureThe chapter states that neither the company nor anyone connected with the offer has verified the data (RHP p.132).p.132

    “The chapter states that neither the company nor anyone connected with the offer has verified the data (RHP p.132).”

  62. 62
    Market size and industry structureWhat the company is today: ₹6,120.18 lakh of FY26 revenue from India (RHP p.152).p.152

    “What the company is today: ₹6,120.18 lakh of FY26 revenue from India (RHP p.152).”

  63. 63
    Market size and industry structureSize over time: according to the report, the India market was US$ 809.52 million in 2021 and US$ 903.53 million in 2022, before the US$ 1,011.55 million of 2023 (RHP p.144).p.144

    “Size over time: according to the report, the India market was US$ 809.52 million in 2021 and US$ 903.53 million in 2022, before the US$ 1,011.55 million of 2023 (RHP p.144).”

  64. 64
    Market size and industry structureThe report projects US$ 2,665.58 million by 2031, a CAGR of 12.9% from 2023 to 2031 (RHP p.144); that is the report's projection, not newboard's.p.144

    “The report projects US$ 2,665.58 million by 2031, a CAGR of 12.9% from 2023 to 2031 (RHP p.144); that is the report's projection, not newboard's.”

  65. 65
    Market size and industry structureSegments: the report divides the market by type (solution and services), application, industry, deployment (on-premises and cloud) and enterprise size (large enterprises and SMEs) (RHP p.132).p.132

    “Segments: the report divides the market by type (solution and services), application, industry, deployment (on-premises and cloud) and enterprise size (large enterprises and SMEs) (RHP p.132).”

  66. 66
    Market size and industry structureThe company offers both on-premises licences and cloud subscriptions (RHP p.149), so it falls in both deployment segments.p.149

    “The company offers both on-premises licences and cloud subscriptions (RHP p.149), so it falls in both deployment segments.”

  67. 67
    Market size and industry structureIn the report's India table by industry, IT and telecom was the largest line in 2023 at US$ 300.02 million and government was US$ 69.70 million; the report projects 15.5% and 9.5% a year for them from 2023 to 2031 (RHP p.145).p.145

    “In the report's India table by industry, IT and telecom was the largest line in 2023 at US$ 300.02 million and government was US$ 69.70 million; the report projects 15.5% and 9.5% a year for them from 2023 to 2031 (RHP p.145).”

  68. 68
    Market size and industry structureWhat drives demand: the chapter names data-driven decision-making and the addition of AI to these tools (RHP p.132); government digitisation programmes, remote working, and cloud and AI adoption (RHP p.133); and a move to unified platforms (RHP p.134).p.132

    “What drives demand: the chapter names data-driven decision-making and the addition of AI to these tools (RHP p.132); government digitisation programmes, remote working, and cloud and AI adoption (RHP p.133); and a move to unified platforms (RHP p.134).”

  69. 69
    Market size and industry structureFor India it names the Bring Your Own Device culture, with 75% of Indian workers said to be highly interested in such policies, and the generative AI centres HCL Tech and IBM launched in July 2024 (RHP p.144).p.144

    “For India it names the Bring Your Own Device culture, with 75% of Indian workers said to be highly interested in such policies, and the generative AI centres HCL Tech and IBM launched in July 2024 (RHP p.144).”

  70. 70
    Market size and industry structureStructure: the chapter lists Ardent IT Private Limited, Alnafitha IT, PROV International Inc., BMC Software, Happiest Minds, IBM, Oracle, Microsoft, Fujitsu and NTT DATA among the major global players, and says many other companies operate in the market (RHP p.132).p.132

    “Structure: the chapter lists Ardent IT Private Limited, Alnafitha IT, PROV International Inc., BMC Software, Happiest Minds, IBM, Oracle, Microsoft, Fujitsu and NTT DATA among the major global players, and says many other companies operate in the market (RHP p.132).”

  71. 71
    Market size and industry structureIt notes that many organisations run separate tools for monitoring, incidents, service requests and asset tracking (RHP p.146).p.146

    “It notes that many organisations run separate tools for monitoring, incidents, service requests and asset tracking (RHP p.146).”

  72. 72
    Market size and industry structureThe company itself says it competes with organised and unorganised players (RHP p.164).p.164

    “The company itself says it competes with organised and unorganised players (RHP p.164).”

  73. 73
    Market size and industry structureThe one input it discusses is skilled staff: it cites a survey in which the share of US HR professionals reporting skills gaps rose from 55% in 2021 to 69% in 2023, and says competition for IT talent has raised labour costs and turnover (RHP p.146).p.146

    “The one input it discusses is skilled staff: it cites a survey in which the share of US HR professionals reporting skills gaps rose from 55% in 2021 to 69% in 2023, and says competition for IT talent has raised labour costs and turnover (RHP p.146).”

  74. 74
    Market size and industry structureIndia was 93.92% of the company's FY26 revenue (RHP p.152).p.152

    “India was 93.92% of the company's FY26 revenue (RHP p.152).”

  75. 75
    Market size and industry structureRules: the chapter names rules that IT operations vendors must meet: GDPR, the CCPA, HIPAA, SOX and ISO 27001 (RHP p.147), and data localisation laws such as India's DPDP Act (RHP p.148).p.147

    “Rules: the chapter names rules that IT operations vendors must meet: GDPR, the CCPA, HIPAA, SOX and ISO 27001 (RHP p.147), and data localisation laws such as India's DPDP Act (RHP p.148).”

  76. 76
    Market size and industry structureIt lists three threats: cyber attacks, citing a survey in which 72% of respondents saw cyber threats rise in 2024; tighter regulation, where failure to comply can bring financial penalties (RHP p.147); and data sovereignty rules that can restrict moving monitoring data across borders (RHP p.148).p.147

    “It lists three threats: cyber attacks, citing a survey in which 72% of respondents saw cyber threats rise in 2024; tighter regulation, where failure to comply can bring financial penalties (RHP p.147); and data sovereignty rules that can restrict moving monitoring data across borders (RHP p.148).”

  77. 77
    Competitive positionThe company says it competes with organised and unorganised players, and that reliability and price decide most sales (RHP p.164).p.164

    “The company says it competes with organised and unorganised players, and that reliability and price decide most sales (RHP p.164).”

  78. 78
    Competitive positionIts risk factors name global system integrators and mid-sized and local firms (RHP p.39).p.39

    “Its risk factors name global system integrators and mid-sized and local firms (RHP p.39).”

  79. 79
    Peers the company named> Peers named in the offer document: Newgen Software Technologies Limited (RHP p.120).p.120

    “> Peers named in the offer document: Newgen Software Technologies Limited (RHP p.120).”

  80. 80
    Peers the company namedSource: RHP p.123, RHP p.120; the peer P/E is at the BSE closing price of September 11, 2026 (RHP p.119).p.119

    “Source: RHP p.123, RHP p.120; the peer P/E is at the BSE closing price of September 11, 2026 (RHP p.119).”

  81. 81
    Peers the company namedThe prospectus itself says the peer is not strictly comparable given the company's business and size (RHP p.120).p.120

    “The prospectus itself says the peer is not strictly comparable given the company's business and size (RHP p.120).”

  82. 82
    Valuation at the issue priceThe price band and the minimum bid lot are to be advertised in newspapers at least two working days before the issue opens (RHP p.2), and the P/E rows of the prospectus's own table are blank (RHP p.118, RHP p.119).p.2

    “The price band and the minimum bid lot are to be advertised in newspapers at least two working days before the issue opens (RHP p.2), and the P/E rows of the prospectus's own table are blank (RHP p.118, RHP p.119).”

  83. 83
    Valuation at the issue priceNet asset value was ₹35.55 a share at March 2026 (RHP p.119).p.119

    “Net asset value was ₹35.55 a share at March 2026 (RHP p.119).”

  84. 84
    Valuation at the issue priceThe one peer the prospectus names traded at 23.45 times FY26 earnings on September 11, 2026 (RHP p.119).p.119

    “The one peer the prospectus names traded at 23.45 times FY26 earnings on September 11, 2026 (RHP p.119).”

  85. 85
    Valuation at the issue priceThe last transfer of shares before the offer was at ₹68 on September 16, 2026 (RHP p.125).p.125

    “The last transfer of shares before the offer was at ₹68 on September 16, 2026 (RHP p.125).”

  86. 86
    Risks, in plain wordsCustomers: one customer was 29.55% of FY26 revenue and ten were 88.77% (RHP p.163) → losing one large account moves the whole year → none of them is named.p.163

    “Customers: one customer was 29.55% of FY26 revenue and ten were 88.77% (RHP p.163) → losing one large account moves the whole year → none of them is named.”

  87. 87
    Risks, in plain wordsCollections: receivable days were 249 in FY26 (RHP p.112) → cash arrives long after profit is booked → operating cash flow was 0.45 times profit over three years (our arithmetic, RHP p.56, RHP p.57).p.112

    “Collections: receivable days were 249 in FY26 (RHP p.112) → cash arrives long after profit is booked → operating cash flow was 0.45 times profit over three years (our arithmetic, RHP p.56, RHP p.57).”

  88. 88
    Risks, in plain wordsTiming: 56.48% of FY26 revenue came in the last quarter and 0.57% in the first (RHP p.35) → one delayed contract shifts a year's result → the company says revenue follows project milestones and customer acceptance (RHP p.35).p.35

    “Timing: 56.48% of FY26 revenue came in the last quarter and 0.57% in the first (RHP p.35) → one delayed contract shifts a year's result → the company says revenue follows project milestones and customer acceptance (RHP p.35).”

  89. 89
    Risks, in plain wordsCapitalised development: ₹903.13 lakh of development cost was capitalised in FY26 (RHP p.257) → profit depends on how much is capitalised and how fast it is amortised → amortisation was ₹507.63 lakh (RHP p.257).p.257

    “Capitalised development: ₹903.13 lakh of development cost was capitalised in FY26 (RHP p.257) → profit depends on how much is capitalised and how fast it is amortised → amortisation was ₹507.63 lakh (RHP p.257).”

  90. 90
    Risks, in plain wordsSuppliers: the largest supplier was 60.92% of FY26 purchases (RHP p.163) → hardware and third-party supply sit with one vendor → purchases were ₹862.44 lakh (RHP p.56).p.163

    “Suppliers: the largest supplier was 60.92% of FY26 purchases (RHP p.163) → hardware and third-party supply sit with one vendor → purchases were ₹862.44 lakh (RHP p.56).”

  91. 91
    Risks, in plain wordsPromoters and group: Vedanshi Infotech Private Limited may do similar business (RHP p.33) → conflicts of interest → a non-compete was signed only on September 15, 2026 (RHP p.34).p.33

    “Promoters and group: Vedanshi Infotech Private Limited may do similar business (RHP p.33) → conflicts of interest → a non-compete was signed only on September 15, 2026 (RHP p.34).”

  92. 92
    Risks, in plain wordsThe Infraon logo is owned by the US subsidiary (RHP p.37).p.37

    “The Infraon logo is owned by the US subsidiary (RHP p.37).”

  93. 93
    Litigation and regulatory mattersDirect tax, two cases | Promoters | ₹0.43 lakh | outstanding (RHP p.294)p.294

    “Direct tax, two cases | Promoters | ₹0.43 lakh | outstanding (RHP p.294)”

  94. 94
    Litigation and regulatory mattersDirect tax, one case | Director other than a promoter | ₹0.07 lakh | outstanding (RHP p.293)p.293

    “Direct tax, one case | Director other than a promoter | ₹0.07 lakh | outstanding (RHP p.293)”

  95. 95
    Litigation and regulatory mattersThere are no tax proceedings against the company (RHP p.293).p.293

    “There are no tax proceedings against the company (RHP p.293).”

  96. 96
    Litigation and regulatory mattersOne creditor, an MSME, was owed ₹619.47 lakh at March 2026 and is the only material creditor (RHP p.294).p.294

    “One creditor, an MSME, was owed ₹619.47 lakh at March 2026 and is the only material creditor (RHP p.294).”

  97. 97
    Litigation and regulatory mattersThe late filings and defective forms under section 22 may still attract penalties (RHP p.32).p.32

    “The late filings and defective forms under section 22 may still attract penalties (RHP p.32).”

  98. 98
    What the offer document does not sayThe other income note adds to ₹79.08 lakh but prints a total of ₹73.75 lakh (RHP p.263).p.263

    “The other income note adds to ₹79.08 lakh but prints a total of ₹73.75 lakh (RHP p.263).”

  99. 99
    Key figuresGrowth | EBITDA margin FY24 → FY26 | 38.2% → 35.4% | (RHP p.121)p.121

    “Growth | EBITDA margin FY24 → FY26 | 38.2% → 35.4% | (RHP p.121)”

  100. 100
    Key figuresIssue | Fresh issue | 45,93,600 shares, price not stated | (RHP p.1)p.1

    “Issue | Fresh issue | 45,93,600 shares, price not stated | (RHP p.1)”

  101. 101
    Key figuresIssue | Offer for sale | 11,07,200 shares by 13 sellers | (RHP p.1)p.1

    “Issue | Offer for sale | 11,07,200 shares by 13 sellers | (RHP p.1)”

  102. 102
    Key figuresConcentration | Largest customer | 29.6% of FY26 revenue | (RHP p.163)p.163

    “Concentration | Largest customer | 29.6% of FY26 revenue | (RHP p.163)”

  103. 103
    Key figuresConcentration | Top five customers | 76.1% of FY26 revenue | (RHP p.163)p.163

    “Concentration | Top five customers | 76.1% of FY26 revenue | (RHP p.163)”

  104. 104
    Key figuresConcentration | Top ten customers | 88.8% of FY26 revenue | (RHP p.163)p.163

    “Concentration | Top ten customers | 88.8% of FY26 revenue | (RHP p.163)”

  105. 105
    Key figuresConcentration | Largest supplier | 60.9% of FY26 purchases | (RHP p.163)p.163

    “Concentration | Largest supplier | 60.9% of FY26 purchases | (RHP p.163)”

  106. 106
    Key figuresBalance sheet | Borrowings March 2026 | none | (RHP p.278)p.278

    “Balance sheet | Borrowings March 2026 | none | (RHP p.278)”

  107. 107
    Key figuresBalance sheet | ROCE FY26 | 36.2% | (RHP p.121)p.121

    “Balance sheet | ROCE FY26 | 36.2% | (RHP p.121)”

  108. 108
    Key figuresWorth reading | Operating cash flow FY26 | ₹9.2 cr | (RHP p.57)p.57

    “Worth reading | Operating cash flow FY26 | ₹9.2 cr | (RHP p.57)”

  109. 109
    Key figuresWorth reading | Contingent liabilities | none | (RHP p.58)p.58

    “Worth reading | Contingent liabilities | none | (RHP p.58)”

  110. 110
    Key figuresWorth reading | Cases against promoters | two direct-tax matters, ₹0.43 lakh | (RHP p.294)p.294

    “Worth reading | Cases against promoters | two direct-tax matters, ₹0.43 lakh | (RHP p.294)”

  111. 111
    Key figuresWorth reading | Development cost capitalised FY26 | ₹9.0 cr | (RHP p.257)p.257

    “Worth reading | Development cost capitalised FY26 | ₹9.0 cr | (RHP p.257)”

  112. 112
    Key figuresWorth reading | Order book August 2026 | ₹39.1 cr | (RHP p.162)p.162

    “Worth reading | Order book August 2026 | ₹39.1 cr | (RHP p.162)”

  113. 113
    Key figuresBefore the IPO | Revenue FY24 → FY26 | ₹45.2 cr → ₹65.1 cr | (RHP p.56)p.56

    “Before the IPO | Revenue FY24 → FY26 | ₹45.2 cr → ₹65.1 cr | (RHP p.56)”

  114. 114
    Key figuresBefore the IPO | PAT FY24 → FY26 | ₹10.8 cr → ₹13.1 cr | (RHP p.56)p.56

    “Before the IPO | PAT FY24 → FY26 | ₹10.8 cr → ₹13.1 cr | (RHP p.56)”

  115. 115
    Key figuresBefore the IPO | Receivable days FY24 → FY26 | 205 → 249 | (RHP p.112)p.112

    “Before the IPO | Receivable days FY24 → FY26 | 205 → 249 | (RHP p.112)”

  116. 116
    Key figuresBefore the IPO | Bonus issue | 3:1, April 2022 | (RHP p.74)p.74

    “Before the IPO | Bonus issue | 3:1, April 2022 | (RHP p.74)”

  117. 117
    Key figuresBefore the IPO | Bonus issue | 8:1, November 2024 | (RHP p.75)p.75

    “Before the IPO | Bonus issue | 8:1, November 2024 | (RHP p.75)”

  118. 118
    Key figuresBefore the IPO | Share split | consolidation of ₹1 shares into ₹10 shares, October 2024 | (RHP p.75)p.75

    “Before the IPO | Share split | consolidation of ₹1 shares into ₹10 shares, October 2024 | (RHP p.75)”

  119. 119
    Key figuresBefore the IPO | Last allotment before the IPO | 8:1 bonus, November 2024, no cash | (RHP p.75)p.75

    “Before the IPO | Last allotment before the IPO | 8:1 bonus, November 2024, no cash | (RHP p.75)”

  120. 120
    Key figuresBefore the IPO | Auditor change | S H & Co to CGSS & Associates LLP, October 2024 | (RHP p.69)p.69

    “Before the IPO | Auditor change | S H & Co to CGSS & Associates LLP, October 2024 | (RHP p.69)”

  121. 121
    Key figuresBefore the IPO | Converted to a public company | September 2024 | (RHP p.2)p.2

    “Before the IPO | Converted to a public company | September 2024 | (RHP p.2)”

  122. 122
    Key figuresWho is involved | Industry | IT services and software | (RHP p.149)p.149

    “Who is involved | Industry | IT services and software | (RHP p.149)”

  123. 123
    Key figuresWho is involved | Promoter | Satish Kumar Vijayaragavan | (RHP p.226)p.226

    “Who is involved | Promoter | Satish Kumar Vijayaragavan | (RHP p.226)”

  124. 124
    Key figuresWho is involved | Promoter | Sudhakar Aruchamy | (RHP p.226)p.226

    “Who is involved | Promoter | Sudhakar Aruchamy | (RHP p.226)”

  125. 125
    Key figuresWho is involved | Promoter | Arun Prasath Ramadoss | (RHP p.226)p.226

    “Who is involved | Promoter | Arun Prasath Ramadoss | (RHP p.226)”

  126. 126
    Key figuresWho is involved | Promoter | Ramesh Pratap Tiwari | (RHP p.226)p.226

    “Who is involved | Promoter | Ramesh Pratap Tiwari | (RHP p.226)”

  127. 127
    Key figuresWho is involved | Promoter | Deepak Kumar Shenbagarajan | (RHP p.226)p.226

    “Who is involved | Promoter | Deepak Kumar Shenbagarajan | (RHP p.226)”

  128. 128
    Key figuresWho is involved | Promoter | Srikanth Audina | (RHP p.226)p.226

    “Who is involved | Promoter | Srikanth Audina | (RHP p.226)”

  129. 129
    Key figuresWho is involved | Promoter | Ganesh Kumar Nagaiah | (RHP p.226)p.226

    “Who is involved | Promoter | Ganesh Kumar Nagaiah | (RHP p.226)”

  130. 130
    Key figuresWho is involved | Promoter | Deepak Gupta | (RHP p.226)p.226

    “Who is involved | Promoter | Deepak Gupta | (RHP p.226)”

  131. 131
    Key figuresWho is involved | Selling shareholder | Satish Kumar Vijayaragavan (promoter), 1,10,400 shares | (RHP p.1)p.1

    “Who is involved | Selling shareholder | Satish Kumar Vijayaragavan (promoter), 1,10,400 shares | (RHP p.1)”

  132. 132
    Key figuresWho is involved | Selling shareholder | Srikanth Audina (promoter), 1,10,400 shares | (RHP p.1)p.1

    “Who is involved | Selling shareholder | Srikanth Audina (promoter), 1,10,400 shares | (RHP p.1)”

  133. 133
    Key figuresWho is involved | Selling shareholder | Sudhakar Aruchamy (promoter), 1,10,400 shares | (RHP p.1)p.1

    “Who is involved | Selling shareholder | Sudhakar Aruchamy (promoter), 1,10,400 shares | (RHP p.1)”

  134. 134
    Key figuresWho is involved | Selling shareholder | Ramesh Pratap Tiwari (promoter), 1,10,400 shares | (RHP p.1)p.1

    “Who is involved | Selling shareholder | Ramesh Pratap Tiwari (promoter), 1,10,400 shares | (RHP p.1)”

  135. 135
    Key figuresWho is involved | Selling shareholder | Ganesh Kumar Nagaiah (promoter), 1,10,400 shares | (RHP p.1)p.1

    “Who is involved | Selling shareholder | Ganesh Kumar Nagaiah (promoter), 1,10,400 shares | (RHP p.1)”

  136. 136
    Key figuresWho is involved | Selling shareholder | Deepak Kumar Shenbagarajan (promoter), 1,31,200 shares | (RHP p.1)p.1

    “Who is involved | Selling shareholder | Deepak Kumar Shenbagarajan (promoter), 1,31,200 shares | (RHP p.1)”

  137. 137
    Key figuresWho is involved | Selling shareholder | Deepak Gupta (promoter), 1,10,400 shares | (RHP p.1)p.1

    “Who is involved | Selling shareholder | Deepak Gupta (promoter), 1,10,400 shares | (RHP p.1)”

  138. 138
    Key figuresWho is involved | Selling shareholder | Arun Prasath Ramadoss (promoter), 1,43,200 shares | (RHP p.1)p.1

    “Who is involved | Selling shareholder | Arun Prasath Ramadoss (promoter), 1,43,200 shares | (RHP p.1)”

  139. 139
    Key figuresWho is involved | Selling shareholder | Abhirup Sarkar (individual), 43,200 shares | (RHP p.1)p.1

    “Who is involved | Selling shareholder | Abhirup Sarkar (individual), 43,200 shares | (RHP p.1)”

  140. 140
    Key figuresWho is involved | Selling shareholder | Prakash Bhat (individual), 33,600 shares | (RHP p.1)p.1

    “Who is involved | Selling shareholder | Prakash Bhat (individual), 33,600 shares | (RHP p.1)”

  141. 141
    Key figuresWho is involved | Selling shareholder | Praveen Kumar Sinha (individual), 38,400 shares | (RHP p.1)p.1

    “Who is involved | Selling shareholder | Praveen Kumar Sinha (individual), 38,400 shares | (RHP p.1)”

  142. 142
    Key figuresWho is involved | Selling shareholder | Ramya Sellamuthu (individual), 24,000 shares | (RHP p.1)p.1

    “Who is involved | Selling shareholder | Ramya Sellamuthu (individual), 24,000 shares | (RHP p.1)”

  143. 143
    Key figuresWho is involved | Selling shareholder | Samaresh Mandal (individual), 31,200 shares | (RHP p.1)p.1

    “Who is involved | Selling shareholder | Samaresh Mandal (individual), 31,200 shares | (RHP p.1)”

  144. 144
    Key figuresWho is involved | Pre-IPO investor | Kedia Securities Private Limited, 5.0% before the issue | (RHP p.85)p.85

    “Who is involved | Pre-IPO investor | Kedia Securities Private Limited, 5.0% before the issue | (RHP p.85)”

Everestims Technologies SME IPO: before the IPO

The record up to the issue and what changed in the company's capital and auditors, from the offer document.

Revenue FY24 → FY26
₹45.2 cr → ₹65.1 cr
PAT FY24 → FY26
₹10.8 cr → ₹13.1 cr
Receivable days FY24 → FY26
205 → 249
Promoter remuneration FY24 → FY26
₹1.8 cr → ₹5.1 cr, FY24 for the three promoters then directors
Bonus issue
3:1, April 2022
Bonus issue
8:1, November 2024
Share split
consolidation of ₹1 shares into ₹10 shares, October 2024
Pre-IPO placement
no new shares; 8,50,010 existing shares sold to Kedia Securities Private Limited at ₹68, September 2026
Last allotment before the IPO
8:1 bonus, November 2024, no cash
Auditor change
S H & Co to CGSS & Associates LLP, October 2024
Converted to a public company
September 2024

What changed just before the IPO, in the study

Everestims Technologies SME IPO: checks

Factual conditions, each with a fixed threshold, read from the key figures. A condition met is a fact to read up on in the study, not a verdict on the issue; meeting none is not a verdict either.

The 13 checks and their thresholds

Everestims Technologies SME IPO: questions answered

When does the Everestims Technologies SME IPO open, and what are the price band and lot size?

Bidding runs Tue 29 Sept to Mon 5 Oct. The price band is not announced yet.

When will the Everestims Technologies SME IPO list?

Under SEBI's T+3 timeline, shares list on the third working day after the issue closes; this issue closes on 5 Oct 2026. The exchange confirms the listing date in a notice once allotment is final.

How do I check the Everestims Technologies SME IPO allotment status?

Allotment is finalised by the registrar usually the working day after the issue closes. Check it on the registrar's website with a PAN, application number or DP ID. Shares not allotted have their blocked amount released by the refund date.

The Everestims Technologies SME IPO allotment status page, with the direct links

What are Everestims Technologies SME's financials?

Revenue went ₹45.2 cr to ₹65.1 cr (FY24 to FY26), 20.0% a year. Profit after tax went ₹10.8 cr to ₹13.1 cr (FY24 to FY26), 10.1% a year. All figures are from the offer document's restated statements.

The growth record, in the study

How much of Everestims Technologies SME's revenue comes from its largest customer?

The largest customer brought 29.6% of FY26 revenue, and the top ten customers 88.8%, as the offer document gives it. The study shows the years before and whether the customers are named.

Where the money comes from, in the study

What is the Everestims Technologies SME IPO GMP?

newboard does not publish a grey-market premium. Grey-market deals happen outside the stock exchanges, are not regulated, and leave no public record of who traded at what price. What is on record is the offer document, read on this page, and the exchanges' bid book.

Everestims Technologies SME IPO: the next step, on Telegram

A message when there is news on its price band, bidding, allotment status, listing day and use-of-proceeds reports. Free, no account, leave in one tap. Send /stop to end it.

Not on this page yet: the peer table the issuer printed. Each is added when the pipeline extracts it from the offer document.